Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polar decomposition of a closed densely defined operator

Statement

Here a partial isometry, including when either Hilbert space is zero, is a bounded linear map U that is isometric on (ker⁡U)⊥ and vanishes on ker⁡U. The initial space is (ker⁡U)⊥ and the final space is ran⁡U. On nonzero Hilbert spaces this is the earlier definition.

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let H1,H2 be complex Hilbert spaces and let A:D(A)⊆H1→H2 be a linear operator with dense domain and closed graph. Let A∗ be the unbounded adjoint defined earlier. For a densely defined linear operator R:D(R)⊆K→K on a complex Hilbert space K, self-adjoint means D(R)=D(R∗) and Rx=R∗x on this domain; positive means self-adjoint and ⟨Rx,x⟩∈[0,+∞) for every x∈D(R). A unitary is a surjective linear isometry. Then T:=A∗A, on D(T)={x∈D(A):Ax∈D(A∗)}, is positive and self-adjoint. Its positive square root P:=T1/2 has domain D(P)=D(A) and satisfies ∥Px∥=∥Ax∥ for every x∈D(A). There is a unique partial isometry U:H1→H2 such that A=UP,ker⁡U=ker⁡A. Its initial space is ran⁡P‾=(ker⁡A)⊥ and its final space is ran⁡A‾. If A is injective and has dense range, then U is unitary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Choice, complex Hilbert spaces H1,H2, and a densely defined linear A:D(A)⊆H1→H2 whose graph is closed.

[F1]

The graph is a closed linear subspace of the Hilbert direct sum H1⊕H2. Every closed subspace has an orthogonal projection under Countable Choice (Conjugate Hilbert space and adjoint of an antilinear operator, Orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace, The Hilbert orthogonal projection onto a closed subspace).

[F2]

For densely defined A, y∈D(A∗) exactly when x↦⟨Ax,y⟩ is bounded in the H1 norm; then ⟨Ax,y⟩=⟨x,A∗y⟩ (Conjugate Hilbert space and adjoint of an antilinear operator).

[F3]

The unbounded spectral theorem for a positive self-adjoint T supplies its spectral measure, the domain calculus for T1/2, and bounded spectral cutoffs (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)).

[F4]

For a positive spectral measure μ, nonnegative measurable functions gn↑g satisfy ∫gn dμ↑∫g dμ (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F5]

For a bounded linear operator R between Hilbert spaces, ran⁡R‾=(ker⁡R∗)⊥ (Kernel–range orthogonality for Hilbert adjoints). This is used for the bounded resolvent in step 2.1. The corresponding range-kernel identity for the unbounded self-adjoint operator P is proved directly in step 5.1.

[F6]

A partial isometry is an isometry on its initial space and zero on its orthogonal complement; its final space is the closure of its range (Isometry coisometry and partial isometry).

[A1]

Choice implies Countable Choice, the hypothesis for the graph projection and Hilbert orthogonal decompositions (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: [A1], H1,H2, and A as in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2construct

If H1={0}, density forces D(A)={0} and A=0. Put T=P=U=0 with their zero-space domains. Then T is positive and self-adjoint, P=T1/2, ker⁡U=ker⁡A={0}, both asserted range closures are {0}, and U is a partial isometry by the zero-space convention in the Statement. If A also has dense range, then H2={0} and U is unitary. Thus the conclusion holds; assume henceforth H1≠{0}. Project (y,0) orthogonally onto the closed graph Γ(A) to obtain (x,Ax). Orthogonality against every (z,Az) with z∈D(A) gives ⟨Az,Ax⟩=⟨z,y−x⟩. By [F2], Ax∈D(A∗) and A∗Ax=y−x, so (I+T)x=y. Thus I+T is onto; it is injective because ⟨(I+T)x,x⟩=∥x∥2+∥Ax∥2, which vanishes only for x=0.

2.1A1F2F5step 1.1algebra

Let R=(I+T)−1. If x=Ry, the preceding identity and Cauchy–Schwarz give ∥Ry∥≤∥y∥, so R is bounded. For x=Ry and w=Rz, the graph-projection identity applied with test vectors w and x gives ⟨y−x,w⟩=⟨Ax,Aw⟩ and ⟨z−w,x⟩=⟨Aw,Ax⟩. Conjugating the second equality and comparing shows ⟨Ry,z⟩=⟨y,Rz⟩; hence R is self-adjoint. It is injective and its range is exactly D(T), so [F5] gives D(T)‾=ran⁡R‾=H1. The operator T is symmetric, because for x,y∈D(T), ⟨Tx,y⟩=⟨Ax,Ay⟩=⟨x,Ty⟩, and positive, because ⟨Tx,x⟩=∥Ax∥2. Finally let y∈D(T∗) and choose x∈D(T) with (I+T)x=(I+T∗)y, possible by step 1.1. Then (I+T∗)(y−x)=0. If v lies in this kernel, then ⟨(I+T)z,v⟩=0 for every z∈D(T); surjectivity of I+T forces v=0. Thus y=x∈D(T) and T∗y=Ty. Therefore T is self-adjoint.

3.1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra

Let E be the spectral measure of the positive self-adjoint T. It is supported on [0,+∞): if E([−N,−1/N])≠0 for some positive integer N, a nonzero vector in its range lies in D(T) and has ⟨Tz,z⟩≤−N−1∥z∥2<0, contradicting positivity; these intervals cover (−∞,0). Set P=T1/2. For x∈D(T), the spectral calculus and the adjoint identity give ∥Px∥2=⟨Tx,x⟩=∥Ax∥2. Now take any x∈D(A) and, for each integer n≥1, define fn(λ)=n/(n+λ) on [0,+∞) and xn=fn(T)x=n(n+T)−1x. Since fn and λfn are bounded, xn∈D(T) and Txn=n(x−xn). For z∈D(A), write d=z−xn. The adjoint identity gives ⟨Ad,Axn⟩=⟨d,Txn⟩=−n⟨d,xn−x⟩. Expanding squared norms therefore yields ∥Az∥2+n∥z−x∥2=∥Axn∥2+n∥xn−x∥2+∥Ad∥2+n∥d∥2. Taking z=x shows ∥Axn∥2≤∥Ax∥2. If μx(B)=⟨E(B)x,x⟩, then ∥Pxn∥2=∥Axn∥2=∫[0,∞)λfn(λ)2 dμx(λ). The integrands increase pointwise to λ, so [F4] gives ∫λ dμx≤∥Ax∥2. By the domain formula for P=T1/2, x∈D(P) and ∥Px∥≤∥Ax∥.

4.1F1F3step 3.1

Conversely, if x∈D(P), let xn=E([0,n])x. The spectral theorem gives xn∈D(T) and xn→x; also Pxn→Px, since the tails of the finite measure μx and of the integrable function λ with respect to μx tend to zero. Step 3.1 applied to xn−xm∈D(T) shows that Axn is Cauchy and ∥Axn−Axm∥=∥P(xn−xm)∥. Closedness of A then gives x∈D(A) and Ax=lim⁡nAxn; taking norms yields ∥Ax∥=∥Px∥. Together with step 3.1 this proves D(P)=D(A) and the asserted norm identity.

5.1F1F2F5F6step 4.1algebra

First, ker⁡P is closed because P is closed. For y∈H1, y⊥ran⁡P exactly when ⟨Px,y⟩=0 for every x∈D(P). The adjoint definition then gives y∈D(P∗) and P∗y=0; since P=P∗, this is equivalent to y∈ker⁡P. Conversely, if y∈ker⁡P, self-adjointness gives ⟨Px,y⟩=⟨x,Py⟩=0 for all x∈D(P). Hence (ran⁡P)⊥=ker⁡P. For C=ran⁡P‾, we have C⊥=ker⁡P; the orthogonal decomposition theorem applied to C and ker⁡P therefore gives C=(ker⁡P)⊥. The norm identity from step 4.1 also gives ker⁡P=ker⁡A. On ran⁡P, define V(Px)=Ax. If Px=Py, then ∥A(x−y)∥=∥P(x−y)∥=0, so V is well defined; the norm identity makes it an isometry. Extend it continuously to C and set it to zero on ker⁡P. For x=c+k with c∈C and k∈ker⁡P, ∥Ux∥=∥c∥≤∥x∥; thus the resulting linear map U is bounded. It has kernel ker⁡P, is isometric on C=(ker⁡A)⊥, and A=UP. Its range is ran⁡A‾ because the extension of V has range the closure of V(ran⁡P)=ran⁡A. If A is injective with dense range, its initial and final spaces are all of H1 and H2, respectively, so U is unitary. Any partial isometry with the stated factorization and kernel agrees with U on ran⁡P and vanishes on ker⁡P; continuity gives uniqueness.

6.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Steps 1.1–5.1 prove positivity and self-adjointness of A∗A, the domain and norm identity for its positive square root, the polar factorization, and the asserted initial/final spaces and uniqueness.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources