How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive-einbein variation and massive/null sector equations
Statement
Let , let be a curve with parameter and , fix , let be smooth, and let be constant. Take independent fixed-endpoint variations of and smooth interior variations of . For the action
independent fixed-endpoint variations in and interior variations in give
On the future timelike massive branch , this constraint uniquely gives , , and the action reduces to ; in proper-time gauge , . On the nonzero future null branch , is nonzero future null and ; if , then and . There is no null proper-time gauge, and the scale of remains initial data. For finite intervals and , an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism with gives and ; the einbein action is invariant, and this transformation preserves the stated curve and smooth-einbein configuration class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth metric-compatible torsion-free connection, , , and the fixed-endpoint variation class in the Statement.
The connection is metric-compatible and torsion-free (Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields).
For a future timelike tangent, and (Proper-time parameter and normalized tangent).
Smooth parameter derivatives may pass through the compact integral (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral).
Integration by parts gives under its stated differentiability and integrability hypotheses (If are differentiable on with integrable, then ).
A smooth bump can be chosen nonnegative, equal to near an interior point and supported in a prescribed interval (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).
A continuous function bounded below by on a subinterval with has integral at least (If on and both are integrable then ; and ).
For the reduced massive action , stationarity is equivalent to (Timelike length action: arbitrary-parameter first variation).
Under a monotone bijective reparametrization, a Riemann integral transforms by its derivative (Monotone change of variable for Riemann-integrable functions).
For a two-parameter map, mixed partial derivatives commute (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).
In a chart, torsion-freeness is equivalent to (Torsion freedom and metric compatibility in chart components).
Along a smooth curve the covariant derivative is the pullback connection (Covariant derivative along a curve). For a field along a curve , use , with one-sided endpoint derivatives. Its coordinate independence and metric-pairing rule at this regularity are proved in Timelike length action: arbitrary-parameter first variation, Proof 1.1, by matching values and first derivatives with smooth data and applying the component compatibility identity.
Proof
Differentiating the integrand with respect to gives . If were nonzero at an interior point, continuity would keep its sign and magnitude at least on a smaller interval. A nonnegative bump from [F5], supported there and equal to on a subinterval, then gives by [F6]. The variation remains positive for small , contradicting stationarity. Thus throughout the interior and by continuity at the endpoints; multiplying by yields the constraint.
Since the variation has tangent fields, the finite-regularity derivative of [F11] applies. For a fixed-endpoint variation field , in a chart [F11] gives the difference components as by [F10] and [F9], so metric compatibility gives . Apply [F4] to ; its boundary term vanishes because , yielding . If were nonzero at an interior point, nondegeneracy supplies a coordinate direction with nonzero pairing there; choose its sign and multiply by the nonnegative bump [F5], then realize it by on that support in a chart , and keep off the support. On a subinterval where the bump is , [F6] makes the pairing integral strictly positive, so the first variation is nonzero and stationarity forces ; conversely this equation makes the variation vanish.
If and is future timelike, the constraint gives because are positive. By [F2], . Substitution in the action gives , and when , so . The Euler equation becomes , so [F7] identifies it exactly with the reduced action equation.
If , the constraint is ; on the stipulated nonzero future branch is nonzero future null. The equation in step 1.2 is . Define increasing by ; then and . Since , the positive timelike density required by the proper-time construction is absent; the null scale is therefore not fixed by a massive normalization.
Under with , and . Substitution gives . By [F8] its integral in equals the original integral in , proving the stated invariance for every .
Depends on
Particle spacetime, observers and worldlines
Proper-time parameter and normalized tangent
Timelike length action: arbitrary-parameter first variation
Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields
Torsion freedom and metric compatibility in chart components
Covariant derivative along a curve
Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral
If are differentiable on with integrable, then
A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
If on and both are integrable then ; and
Monotone change of variable for Riemann-integrable functions
Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives