Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Timelike length action: arbitrary-parameter first variation

Statement

Let (M,g,N) be a prescribed smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold, a<b, and x:[a,b]→M a C2 future timelike curve. Put T=dx/ds, ℓ=−g(T,T)>0, and for a constant m>0 and c>0 define the length action S[x]=−mc∫abℓ(s) ds. Let H(ϵ,s) be a C2 fixed-endpoint variation through future timelike curves for ϵ near 0, with H(0,s)=x(s), H(ϵ,a)=x(a), H(ϵ,b)=x(b), and variation field J=∂ϵH∣0. Then

δS=ddϵS[H(ϵ,⋅)]∣0=−mc∫abg ⁣(J,Ds ⁣(Tℓ))ds.

Consequently x is stationary under all such variations exactly when Ds(T/ℓ)=0, equivalently DτU=0 for the proper-time parameter of Proper-time parameter and normalized tangent. The length integral has the same value under every orientation-preserving C1 change of variable s=ϕ(r) with ϕ:[a′,b′]→[a,b] a diffeomorphism and ϕ′>0, namely ∫a′b′ℓr(r) dr=∫abℓ(s) ds for Tr(r)=ϕ′(r)T(ϕ(r)) and ℓr(r)=−g(Tr(r),Tr(r)). As a transformation of the stated C2 curve and variation class, require instead that ϕ be an orientation-preserving C2 diffeomorphism; then the stationarity equation is covariant, since Dr(Tr/ℓr)(r)=ϕ′(r)(Ds(T/ℓ))(ϕ(r)). This is a local variational statement; it makes no claim about global proper-time maximality, and the square-root action is not defined for a nonzero null tangent.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The curve, metric, fixed-endpoint variation, and m,c>0 in the Statement.

[F2]

Differentiation under a compact integral is valid when the integrand and its parameter derivative are continuous (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral).

[F3]

Integration by parts has the endpoint formula ∫abuv′=[uv]ab−∫abu′v when the functions are differentiable and their derivatives integrable (If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v).

[F4]

A smooth bump can be chosen equal to 1 near an interior point and supported in a prescribed larger interval (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).

[F5]

Nondegeneracy of gp means v↦gp(v,⋅) is an isomorphism, so a nonzero vector pairs nontrivially with some coordinate vector (The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising).

[F6]

For a C2 two-parameter map, mixed partial derivatives commute (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).

[F7]

A monotone C1 change of parameter transforms the Riemann integral by its derivative (Monotone change of variable for Riemann-integrable functions).

[F8]

If a continuous integrable function is at least δ>0 on an interval [u,v] with u<v, then its integral there is at least δ(v−u)>0 (If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)).

[F9]

In a chart, metric compatibility gives ∂bgac=Γdbagdc+Γdbcgad, and torsion-freeness is equivalent to Γabc=Γacb (Torsion freedom and metric compatibility in chart components).

[F10]

Along a smooth curve the covariant derivative is the pullback connection DsV=(x∗∇)∂sV (Covariant derivative along a curve).

Proof

1.1givenF9F10constructalgebra

For a C1 field V along a C1 curve y, define DsV in coordinates by (DsV)a=(Va)′+Γabc(y)(yb)′Vc. At any parameter value replace the coordinate functions of y and V locally by affine functions with the same values and first derivatives. This gives a smooth curve and smooth field with the same values and first derivatives; the displayed formula agrees there with [F10]. In another chart the component formula and its transformation depend only on those values and first derivatives and the smooth chart transition, so the intrinsic smooth derivative in [F10] proves coordinate independence also for the C1 data. The ordinary product rule and the compatibility identity [F9] give (g(V,W))′=g(DsV,W)+g(V,DsW) for C1 fields, since differentiating gab(y)VaWb produces exactly the two connection terms. Derivatives at included endpoints are one-sided. Apply this definition also along each parameter curve of H; H∈C2 makes its tangent fields C1, so all derivatives below exist and are continuous.

2.1givenF1F2F6F9step 1.1algebra

Write Tϵ=∂sH and J=∂ϵH∣0. Differentiating ℓϵ=−g(Tϵ,Tϵ) and using metric compatibility gives ∂ϵℓ∣0=−g(DϵT,T)/ℓ. In a chart, the difference of the two covariant derivatives is Γabc(JbTc−TbJc); it vanishes because [F9] gives Γabc=Γacb and coordinate mixed partials commute by [F6]. Thus DϵT=DsJ. By [F6], mixed derivatives commute; [F2] permits differentiation through the compact integral, so δS=mc∫abg(DsJ,T/ℓ) ds.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F3algebra

Metric compatibility gives ddsg(J,T/ℓ)=g(DsJ,T/ℓ)+g(J,Ds(T/ℓ)). Integrating and applying [F3], the boundary term vanishes because J(a)=J(b)=0, yielding the displayed first-variation formula.

4.1step 3.1F4F5F8construct

If Ds(T/ℓ)=0, step 3.1 makes every fixed-endpoint first variation vanish. Conversely, if this continuous vector field is nonzero at an interior point, [F5] gives a local chart component field Z with g(Z,Ds(T/ℓ)) strictly positive on a smaller interval. Multiply Z by the nonnegative bump [F4], equal to 1 near that point. Choose the support inside one chart interval and define H(ϵ,s)=χ−1(χ(x(s))+ϵJcoord(s)) there for a chart χ, with H=x off the support. The compact support makes this a C2 fixed-endpoint variation; timelikeness persists for small ∣ϵ∣ by openness and compactness. The pairing is bounded below by some δ>0 on an interval where the bump equals 1, so [F8] makes the integral in step 3.1 strictly positive and its prefactor −mc<0 makes the variation nonzero, a contradiction. Thus stationarity forces Ds(T/ℓ)=0 everywhere; a nonzero endpoint value would by continuity give a nonzero interior value.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1givenF7algebra∎

Since U=cT/ℓ and dτ/ds=ℓ/c, the chain rule gives Ds(T/ℓ)=(ℓ/c2)DτU, so the two equations are equivalent. For an orientation-preserving C1 diffeomorphism s=ϕ(r), Tr(r)=ϕ′(r)T(ϕ(r)) and ℓr(r)=ϕ′(r)ℓ(ϕ(r)); [F7] therefore gives ∫a′b′ℓr(r) dr=∫abℓ(s) ds. If ϕ is C2, composition preserves the stated C2 curve and variation classes, and Tr/ℓr=(T/ℓ)∘ϕ gives Dr(Tr/ℓr)(r)=ϕ′(r) Ds(T/ℓ)(ϕ(r)). Thus the stationarity equation, and hence stationarity under the mapped fixed-endpoint variations, is covariant for class-preserving reparametrizations.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources