Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The coded curves are genuine C1 stable and unstable curves of F, with transverse intersection at every finite-word homoclinic point

Statement

Fix a≥100 and let R=a+3, L=a−2R, F(x,y)=(y,y2−a−x), x(s), h and the sets Ws,Wu be as in The two-sign bilateral shift space, its coding map, and the ball of bounded bilateral real sequences, The square-root recurrence Ts(x)n=sna+xn−1+xn+1 is a contraction of BR with a unique coded solution, Finite symbol windows determine the code: locality of the iterates, coding continuity and injectivity of h(σ)=(x−1(σ),x0(σ)) and Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family. For u∈{−1,+1} put ru:=1+ua+1 and let

Mu (v,w):=ua+v+w

be the square-root update of the coded recurrence. Then:

  1. (hyperbolicity) the fixed points (ru,ru) of F are hyperbolic: DF(ru,ru) has two real eigenvalues, one of modulus >1 and one of modulus <1;
  2. (stable curve at a finite-word point) let s∈X± be nonconstant with sn=u for ∣n∣≥N, and put z∗:=h(s). Then there are δs>0 and a C1 curve γs:(−δs,δs)→R2 with γs(0)=z∗, γs((−δs,δs))⊆Ws(ru,ru) and tangent γs′(0)∈C1/2s;
  3. (unstable curve at a finite-word point) likewise there are δu>0 and a C1 curve γu:(−δu,δu)→R2 with γu(0)=z∗, γu((−δu,δu))⊆Wu(ru,ru) and γu′(0)∈C1/2u; consequently z∗ is a transverse homoclinic point of (ru,ru) (Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family);
  4. (local stable and unstable sets at the fixed point) put ρ:=1/8 and define ∥(x,y)∥max⁡:=max⁡(∣x∣,∣y∣). Then the set of points y=(y−1,y0)∈R2 whose forward orbit stays within max-norm distance ρ of (ru,ru),

Γρs:={ y: ∥Fn(y)−(ru,ru)∥max⁡≤ρ for every n≥0 },

is exactly the graph {(b, ru+u0(b)):∣b−ru∣≤ρ} of the half-tail solution map b↦u0(b) obtained from [F2] with the constant reference yn:=ru and b∗:=ru; in particular it is a C1 embedded curve through (ru,ru) whose tangent at the fixed point lies in C1/2s. With Σ(x,y):=(y,x) the same statement holds in the unstable direction: a point has all its backward iterates F−n(y) within max-norm distance ρ of (ru,ru) if and only if it lies in Σ(Γρs), and Σ(Γρs) is a C1 embedded curve through (ru,ru) whose tangent lies in C1/2u.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameter a≥100, the constants R,L, the coded sequences x(s), the coding map h, the fixed points ru, the square-root updates Mu , and a nonconstant code s with sn=u for ∣n∣≥N.

[F1]

Coding data (The square-root recurrence Ts(x)n=sna+xn−1+xn+1 is a contraction of BR with a unique coded solution, Finite symbol windows determine the code: locality of the iterates, coding continuity and injectivity of h(σ)=(x−1(σ),x0(σ)), The quadratic map F(x,y)=(y,y2−a−x) has a compact coded invariant set conjugate to the two-sign shift, with chaos under ACω): xn(s)=Msn (xn−1(s),xn+1(s)), ∣xn(s)∣∈[L,R], and F(h(s))=h(S±s); moreover ∣xn(s)∣≤a+2R<R and R−a+2R=(4a+3)/(R+a+2R)>(4a+3)/(2R)>1/2, since R2−(a+2R)=4a+3.

[F2]

Weighted half-tail lemma (Weighted half-tail contractions for qn=Msn(qn−1,qn+1) give a unique C1 curve with tangent slope bounded by c/(1−q)): for θ=1/2, q=c(θ+θ⁻¹)<1, a compact interval J, a reference half-orbit, and a local parameter interval I satisfying the lemma's radius and margin hypotheses, T_b is a contraction of the closed weighted ball of radius ρ̄ into itself for b∈I. Its unique fixed points u(b) are C¹ in b, satisfy ‖u(b)‖θ≤c|b−b*|/(1−q), and the phase curve b↦(b,y₀+u₀(b)) has tangent (1,d₀) with |d₀|≤c/(1−q); its forward orbit tracks the reference with deviations bounded by ‖u(b)‖_θ.

[F3]

Homoclinic and constant-code data (Constant codes give the fixed points, and finite nonconstant word codes give homoclinic orbits converging to a fixed point at both ends): the constant code uˉ has xn(uˉ)=ru with ru2=a+2ru and sign⁡(ru)=u; for a finite-word code s, Fn(h(s))→(ru,ru) as n→±∞, and h(s)≠(ru,ru) when s≠uˉ.

[F4]

The reflection symmetry (Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family, The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder): with Σ(x,y):=(y,x) one has Σ2=id, Σ∘F∘Σ=F−1 (because ΣFΣ(x,y)=ΣF(y,x)=Σ(x,x2−a−y)=(x2−a−y,x)=F−1(x,y)), and Σ maps C1/2s onto C1/2u.

[F5]

Hyperbolic fixed points (Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value, Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}): DF(x,y)=(01−12y); the characteristic polynomial at (ru,ru) is λ2−2ruλ+1, with roots ru±ru2−1. Here r+=1+a+1>1 and r−=1−a+1<−1, so the supplier's definition tests whether each eigenvalue has modulus different from 1.

[F7]

One-sided bounded sequences and the deviation operator (The bounded functions on a set form a complete metric space in the supremum metric, and the coding map of the two-sign shift space is an isometry, clause 4, Constant codes give the fixed points, and finite nonconstant word codes give homoclinic orbits converging to a fixed point at both ends, Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value, Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}): let ρ=1/8. For either sign, ∣ru∣=a+1−1 or 1+a+1, so ∣ru∣>9 for a≥100. If ∣b−ru∣≤ρ and v,w:N→R have ∥v∥∞,∥w∥∞≤ρ, then in the update (Tbv)n:=Mu (ru+vn−1,ru+vn+1)−ru,v−1:=b−ru, every radicand lies in [ru2−1/4,ru2+1/4]⊂(64,∞), so Tb is defined. For each n≥1 the difference of two outputs is at most (∣vn−1−wn−1∣+∣vn+1−wn+1∣)/16; at n=0 it is at most ∣v1−w1∣/16. Thus ∥Tbv−Tbw∥∞≤(1/8)∥v−w∥∞.

Proof

technique · direct; solve the two slope-free half-tail problems for the square-root update, use the reflection symmetry for the unstable direction, and read off hyperbolicity and transversality
1.1givenF5algebra

Hyperbolicity: the characteristic polynomial in [F5] has the two real roots ru±ru2−1, whose product is 1. If u=+1, then ru>1, so ru+ru2−1>1 and ru−ru2−1=1/(ru+ru2−1)∈(0,1). If u=−1, write ru=−m with m>1; then ru−ru2−1<−1 and ru+ru2−1=−1/(m+m2−1)∈(−1,0). Thus each fixed point has one eigenvalue of modulus greater than 1 and one of modulus less than 1, proving clause 1 by the hyperbolicity definition of Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family.

2.1givenstep 1.1F1F2F3algebra

Stable curve: apply [F2] with θ:=1/2, J:=[−R,R], c:=1/16, q:=5/32, the update Msn , reference yn:=xn(s) (n≥0), b∗:=x−1(s), ρˉ:=1/2, and δ∗:=1/4. By [F1], ∣yn∣≥L>1/2 and ∣yn∣≤a+2R<R−1/2, so the margin condition holds; also ∣b∗∣<R−1/2, so [b∗−δ∗,b∗+δ∗]⊆J, and δ∗<(1−q)ρˉ/c. The updates are C2 on the open set a+v+w>0, containing J×J, with first partials u/(2a+v+w) and second partials −u/(4(a+v+w)3/2). On J×J their first partials have absolute value at most 1/(2L)<1/16, since L≥74>8, and ∣Mu ∣≤a+2R<R. Thus their extensions, image and derivative bounds match every premise of [F2]. The recurrence holds by [F1]. Hence there is a C1 curve b↦Z(b):=(b,x0(b)) through Z(b∗)=(x−1(s),x0(s))=z∗ with tangent (1,d0) and ∣d0∣≤c/(1−q)=2/27<1/2. Every point Z(b) has forward orbit tracking the reference orbit Fn(z∗), which converges to (ru,ru) by [F3]; hence Z(b) lies in Ws(ru,ru) and its tangent lies in C1/2s. This proves clause 2.

3.1givenstep 2.1F1F2F3F4algebra

Unstable curve: put w:=Σ(z∗)=(x0(s),x−1(s)) and let yn:=x−n−1(s) for n≥0, with boundary value b∗:=x0(s). By the recurrence of [F1], this is a reference half-orbit for the square-root update, and ∣yn∣≥L>1/2, ∣yn∣≤a+2R<R−1/2. Apply [F2] with θ=1/2, J=[−R,R], c=1/16, q=5/32, ρˉ=1/2, and δ∗=1/4; the margin and parameter-interval conditions hold by [F1]. The resulting C1 curve through w has tangent (1,d0) with ∣d0∣≤2/27, and its forward orbits track that of w: by [F4], Fn(w)=Σ(F−n(z∗)), which converges to (ru,ru) by [F3]. Reflecting the curve by Σ gives a C1 curve γu through z∗, tangent (d0,1)∈C1/2u, whose points lie in Wu(ru,ru). This proves clause 3.

3.2givenstep 1.1step 2.1F1F2F4

Local stable set: apply [F2] with θ=1/2, J=[−R,R], c=1/16, q=5/32, ρˉ=1/8, δ∗=1/4, the constant symbols sn:=u, constant reference yn:=ru, and b∗:=ru. The reference satisfies the recurrence because ru2=a+2ru and sign⁡(ru)=u, so ru=Mu (ru,ru) by [F3]. By [F7], ∣ru∣>9, and ∣ru∣≤a+2R<R−1/2, so the reference-margin condition and [ru−δ∗,ru+δ∗]⊆J hold; also δ∗<(1−q)ρˉ/c=27/16. Hence there is a C1 map b↦u(b) with ∥u(b)∥θ≤(c/(1−q))∣b−ru∣=(2/27)∣b−ru∣. Define Γ:={(b,ru+u0(b)):∣b−ru∣≤ρ} with ρ:=1/8; this closed parameter interval lies inside I because δ∗=1/4.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F4

Transversality: by steps 2.1 and 3.1 the tangent of γs at z∗ lies in C1/2s and that of γu in C1/2u; since C1/2s∩C1/2u={0} ([F4], Stable and unstable cones, invariant line slopes, stable and unstable sets, and transverse homoclinic points of the quadratic family) the two tangent lines are distinct, so the two curves cross transversely at z∗. This is the transversality assertion of clause 3.

4.2step 3.2F1F2F4algebra

The graph lies in the trapping set: let ∣b−ru∣≤ρ and put x−1:=b, xn:=ru+un(b) for n≥0. By the fixed-point equation of [F2], the sequence satisfies xn=Mu (xn−1,xn+1) for every n≥0, so F(xn−1,xn)=(xn,xn+1) by [F1] and Fn(b,x0)=(xn−1,xn) for all n≥0. Also ∣x−1−ru∣=∣b−ru∣≤ρ and ∣xn−ru∣≤∥u(b)∥θ≤(2/27)∣b−ru∣≤ρ for n≥0. Thus every point of Γ has all forward iterates within max-norm distance ρ of (ru,ru).

4.3givenstep 3.2F1F2F6F7algebra

The trapping set lies in the graph: let y=(y−1,y0) satisfy ∥Fn(y)−(ru,ru)∥max⁡≤ρ for every n≥0, and write Fn(y)=(ξn−1,ξn). Then ∣ξn−ru∣≤ρ for every n≥−1. Since ∣ru∣>9 by [F7], each ξn has sign u and ∣ξn∣>8. The orbit identity ξn+1=ξn2−a−ξn−1 gives a+ξn−1+ξn+1=ξn2>64, so for n≥0 one has ξn=ua+ξn−1+ξn+1=Mu (ξn−1,ξn+1). Put vn:=ξn−ru for n≥0 and b:=y−1. Then ∥v∥∞≤ρ, ∣b−ru∣≤ρ, and the displayed identity says exactly (Tbv)n=vn for all n≥0. The weighted solution u(b) from step 3.2 also satisfies Tbu(b)=u(b) and ∥u(b)∥∞≤∥u(b)∥θ≤(2/27)∣b−ru∣<ρ. By [F7], ∥v−u(b)∥∞=∥Tbv−Tbu(b)∥∞≤(1/8)∥v−u(b)∥∞, so v=u(b) and y=(y−1,ru+u0(y−1))∈Γ.

5.1step 4.1step 4.2step 4.3F2F4

Local stable set identified: steps 4.2 and 4.3 show that the set Γρs of clause 4 equals Γ; by [F2] and step 4.1 the curve Γ is C1 with tangent (1,d0) at the fixed point and ∣d0∣≤c/(1−q)≤2/27<12, so the tangent lies in C1/2s. This is the stable half of clause 4.

6.1step 4.3step 5.1F4F6∎

Local unstable set: by [F4], F−1=ΣFΣ with Σ2=id, and Σ preserves the max norm because it permutes coordinates. Hence for every y and n≥0, ∥F−n(y)−(ru,ru)∥max⁡=∥Fn(Σy)−(ru,ru)∥max⁡. Therefore the set of points whose backward orbit stays within max-norm distance ρ of (ru,ru) is exactly Σ(Γρs)=Σ(Γ). Its tangent at (ru,ru) is Σ(1,d0)=(d0,1)∈C1/2u because Σ maps C1/2s onto C1/2u by [F4], and it is a C1 embedded curve as the image under a linear homeomorphism. This completes the proof of clause 4.

Remarks

  • Clause 4 identifies the local stable and unstable sets of the fixed points with the constructed graphs, which is the piece of the stable-manifold picture used by the transversality argument; no global stable-manifold theorem and no structural-stability theorem is invoked.

  • The unstable curve is obtained from the stable construction by the exact reflection symmetry ΣFΣ=F−1 of the quadratic family; this avoids a separate backward half-tail contraction.

  • The aperture 1/2 is the one used throughout; the derivative bound ∣d0∣≤1/2 is verified with the explicit bound L≥74 and is not claimed to be optimal.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources