Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The driven oscillator: steady response and amplitude profile, bounded damped and off-resonant motions, and unbounded undamped resonance

Physical scope

The response of the driven oscillator model with m>0, k>0, c>=0, drive amplitude f_0 and angular frequency Omega>0: the explicit steady sinusoidal response and its amplitude |f_0|/sqrt((k-m Omega^2)^2+c^2 Omega^2) whenever the denominator does not vanish; the reduction of every motion to the steady response plus a homogeneous motion; boundedness of every motion in the strictly damped case, with exponential convergence of the transient to the steady response; boundedness for c=0 away from Omega=sqrt(k/m); unbounded motions at c=0 and Omega=sqrt(k/m) with nonzero amplitude, so boundedness fails exactly in the off-singular-case sense; and the positive-frequency amplitude peak when f_0 is nonzero and c^2<2mk. For c^2>=2mk and f_0!=0 the amplitude strictly decreases on Omega>0 and has no maximum on that domain; for f_0=0 it is constant. The result is a conditional deduction from the declared drive and damping models; it asserts no measured resonance curve, no value of any parameter and no behaviour of an apparatus.

Statement

Adopt the sinusoidally driven oscillator model of The sinusoidally driven oscillator model: a prescribed external force f0cos⁡(Ωt) added to the damped oscillator with data m>0, k>0, c≥0, f0∈R and Ω>0, force law F(t,x,v)=f0cos⁡(Ωt)−kx−cv and equation m x′′+cx′+kx=f0cos⁡(Ωt). Put ω0:=km,D:=k−mΩ2+i c Ω∈C, and define the steady response xp(t):=Re⁡(f0eiΩtD)=f0[(k−mΩ2)cos⁡(Ωt)+c Ωsin⁡(Ωt)](k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2(D≠0), with amplitude A(Ω):=∣f0∣/(k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2, and in the exceptional case c=0, Ω=ω0 define xp(t):=f0tsin⁡(ω0t)/(2mω0). All all-time boundedness, convergence and unboundedness claims below refer to maximal motions on R; local motions are their restrictions as in clause 2. Then:

  1. Steady response. If D≠0 — that is c>0, or c=0 and Ω≠ω0 — then xp is a motion of the model on R, of period 2π/Ω, with amplitude A(Ω) in the sense ∣xp(t)∣≤A(Ω) for all t and equality at suitable times.
  2. Reduction to the homogeneous model. Every datum has exactly one maximal motion, it is defined on all of R, and every motion x of the model on an interval with nonempty interior can be written x=xp+y, where xp is the particular motion of clause 1, or the resonant motion in the exceptional case, and y is a motion of the damped homogeneous model with the same m, c, k (and is a harmonic motion of The harmonic (linear restoring) model: a declared linear force law with parameter k>0 when c=0).
  3. Strictly damped case c>0. For every Ω>0 the following hold: every motion is bounded on [0,∞); and x(t)−xp(t)→0 and x′(t)−xp′(t)→0 as t→+∞. Moreover xp is the unique motion with datum (t0,xp(t0),xp′(t0)) for any t0∈R. The amplitude function Ω↦A(Ω) has the following shape when f0≠0: if c2<2mk it is strictly increasing on (0,Ω∗) and strictly decreasing on (Ω∗,∞), so has its unique maximum there, with Ω∗=km−c22m2,A(Ω∗)=2m∣f0∣c4mk−c2; if c2≥2mk it is strictly decreasing on (0,∞) and does not attain a maximum on the declared positive-frequency domain. Its continuous extension to Ω=0 has its maximum there. For f0=0 the amplitude is identically zero on the domain, so every frequency has the same value.
  4. Undamped case away from resonance. For c=0 and Ω≠ω0 every motion is bounded on R.
  5. Undamped resonance. For c=0, Ω=ω0 and f0≠0 the motion xp(t)=f0tsin⁡(ω0t)/(2mω0) is unbounded on [0,∞), and every motion of the model is unbounded on [0,∞), although the drive t↦f0cos⁡(ω0t) is bounded.
  6. Off the singular cases. For c>0 the denominator never vanishes and every Ω>0 is admissible; for c=0 the exceptional frequency is exactly Ω=ω0. Consequently the boundedness assertions of clauses 3 and 4 hold for c>0, and for c=0 away from Ω=ω0, and also at undamped resonance when f0=0; for a nonzero drive clause 5 gives unboundedness at undamped resonance.

The statement is read for the declared model data; no value of any parameter and no measured response is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The driven model with data (m,c,k,f0,Ω), its motions on intervals with nonempty interior, the constants ω0,D, the functions xp of clause 1, and the homogeneous damped model with the same m,c,k.

[L1]

Model vocabulary (The sinusoidally driven oscillator model: a prescribed external force f0cos⁡(Ωt) added to the damped oscillator, The one-dimensional force models: data, motions, phase system, potential presentation, energy and equilibria clauses (b), (f), The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data): motions of the driven model are the solutions of m x′′+cx′+kx=f0cos⁡(Ωt), which is the forced oscillator model of The damped driven oscillator model: second-order equation, phase-plane system and characteristic data with the continuous function f(t)=f0cos⁡(Ωt) and k>0; motions of the homogeneous damped model are the solutions with f≡0, and for c=0 these are the motions of the harmonic model by clause 1 of Classification of the motions of the damped oscillator by the discriminant, and nonincreasing energy E′=−c x′2.

[L2]

Sinusoidal forcing: the steady response, its amplitude and phase, and resonance at Ω=k/m: if D≠0 then xp=Re⁡(f0eiΩt/D) is a solution of the forced equation on R, with the displayed real form and amplitude ∣f0∣/(k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2; if c=0 and Ω=ω0 then xp(t)=f0tsin⁡(ω0t)/(2mω0) is a solution on R and is unbounded on [0,∞) when f0≠0; if c>0 then every solution x:[0,∞)→R equals xp+xh with xh homogeneous, and x(t)−xp(t)→0, with x bounded.

[L3]

The forced oscillator with k≥0: unique global solution and the convolution (Green's function) formula: for m>0, c≥0, k>0 and continuous f on an interval I, the forced model has exactly one solution on I for every datum; and The homogeneous damped oscillator: solution classification by the discriminant and uniqueness for initial data classifies the homogeneous solutions.

[L4]

Strictly damped oscillator: explicit decay bounds, convergence to rest and asymptotic stability of the origin clauses 2 and 3: a strictly damped homogeneous motion and its derivative tend to 0 and are bounded; Classification of the motions of the damped oscillator by the discriminant, and nonincreasing energy E′=−c x′2 clause 1: the maximal motion of the homogeneous model with a given datum is unique.

[L5]

The motions of the harmonic model are the sinusoids Acos⁡(ω(t−t0))+Bsin⁡(ω(t−t0)): amplitude and phase, the least period, the conserved energy kR2/2 and the elliptical phase curves clauses 2 and 3: a harmonic motion is bounded by its amplitude R, and ∣y′(t)∣≤ω0R for the motion of amplitude R because y′=−Rω0sin⁡(θ−φ).

[L6]

The amplitude of the sinusoidally forced damped oscillator: location and value of its maximum: for c>0 and f0≠0 the function A(Ω)=∣f0∣/(k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2 is strictly increasing then strictly decreasing with the maximum Ω∗=k/m−c2/(2m2) and value 2m∣f0∣/(c4mk−c2) when c2<2mk, and strictly decreasing on (0,∞) when c2≥2mk.

[L7]

Derivatives (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c)): the real form of xp is a sum of cos⁡(Ωt) and sin⁡(Ωt) with constant coefficients, so xp′(t)=f0Ω[−(k−mΩ2)sin⁡(Ωt)+c Ωcos⁡(Ωt)](k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2, which is bounded in absolute value by Ω∣f0∣(∣k−mΩ2∣+cΩ)/((k−mΩ2)2+c2Ω2).

Proof

technique · cases; verify the explicit particular motions, reduce an arbitrary motion to the particular one plus a homogeneous motion by linearity, and use the decay, boundedness and amplitude results of the suppliers
1.1assume-case 1givenL1L2L7

Clause 1. Assume D≠0. By [L2] the function xp is a solution of the forced equation on R, hence a motion of the model by [L1], with the displayed real form and amplitude ∣xp(t)∣≤A(Ω). Its periodicity: the real form is a constant linear combination of cos⁡(Ω⋅) and sin⁡(Ω⋅), and for every real u one has cos⁡(u+2π)=cos⁡u and sin⁡(u+2π)=sin⁡u by The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi; taking u=Ωt and u=Ω(t+2π/Ω) gives xp(t+2π/Ω)=xp(t).

1.2givenL1L3algebra

Clause 2. The forced model has k>0≥0 and the continuous drive f0cos⁡(Ωt) on I=R, so [L3] gives exactly one solution on R for every datum; hence every maximal motion is defined on R. Let x be a motion on an interval J with nonempty interior and let xp be the particular motion of clause 1 or the resonant motion of [L2]. The function y:=x−xp is of class C2 on J and m y′′+c y′+k y=(m x′′+cx′+kx)−(m xp′′+cxp′+kxp)=f0cos⁡(Ωt)−f0cos⁡(Ωt)=0 by the linearity of the differential expression (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0; the two equations hold on J). Hence y is a motion of the homogeneous damped model on J, and for c=0 it is a harmonic motion by [L1]. This is clause 2.

1.3givenL6

Clause 3, amplitude shape. For f0≠0 use [L6] on the amplitude function A of clause 1; for f0=0, the strictly positive denominator for c>0 gives A(Ω)=0 for every Ω directly.

2.1givenstep 1.2L2L4L7

Clause 3, transient and boundedness. Let c>0; then D≠0 because D=0 would force cΩ=0 and hence Ω=0, contrary to Ω>0. Let x be a motion; by clause 2, y=x−xp is a strictly damped homogeneous motion, so by [L4] y(t)→0 and y′(t)→0, and xp, xp′ are bounded by clause 1 and [L7]; hence x(t)→xp(t) in the sense x(t)−xp(t)→0 and x′(t)−xp′(t)→0, and x is bounded on [0,∞). If x has datum (t0,xp(t0),xp′(t0)), then y is a homogeneous motion with y(t0)=y′(t0)=0; by the uniqueness of [L4] (with the datum (t0,0,0)) y≡0, so x=xp.

2.2assume-case 2givenstep 1.1step 1.2L1L5

Clause 4. Let c=0 and Ω≠ω0. Then D=k−mΩ2=m(ω02−Ω2)≠0, so xp is a motion with ∣xp(t)∣≤A(Ω) by clause 1. Let x be a motion on an interval with nonempty interior; by clause 2, y=x−xp is a harmonic motion, so by [L5] there is Ry≥0 with ∣y(t)∣≤Ry for all t; hence ∣x(t)∣≤A(Ω)+Ry on the interval, and since clause 2 extends the motion to R, the motion is bounded on R.

2.3assume-case 3givenstep 1.2L2L5

Clause 5. Let c=0, Ω=ω0 and f0≠0. By [L2] the function xp(t)=f0tsin⁡(ω0t)/(2mω0) is a motion on R and is unbounded on [0,∞). Let x be any motion; by clause 2, y=x−xp is a harmonic motion, bounded by some Ry by [L5]. Choose tk→+∞ with ∣xp(tk)∣→+∞; then ∣x(tk)∣≥∣xp(tk)∣−∣y(tk)∣≥∣xp(tk)∣−Ry→+∞, so x is unbounded on [0,∞) as well, although ∣f0cos⁡(ω0t)∣≤∣f0∣ is bounded by Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine. This is clause 5.

3.1cases-exhaustivegivenstep 2.1step 2.2step 2.3algebra∎

Clause 6. For c>0 the computation of step 2.1 gives D≠0 for every Ω>0, and clause 3 supplies the boundedness. For c=0, D=0  ⟺  k=mΩ2  ⟺  Ω=ω0 since Ω>0 and ω0>0; clauses 4 and 5 give boundedness away from Ω=ω0 and unboundedness at it when f0≠0. If f0=0 the equation is homogeneous, so the harmonic classification [L5] gives boundedness also at that frequency.

Remarks

  • What resonance is here. The exceptional case is a property of the declared model: with zero damping and a nonzero drive at the undamped frequency, the particular solution grows linearly and every maximal motion is unbounded. Clause 5 states no physical resonance phenomenon; an apparatus comparison would be a separate, empirically qualified step.

  • The quality factor. For c>0 and f0≠0, use the continuous extension of A to 0 and define Q:=A(ω0)/A(0)=mω0/c=ω0/(2γ), where γ=c/(2m). Likharev §5.1, Eqs. (5.20)-(5.22), PDF page 91, concerns the normalized full width of the squared response, not a half width. In the source's low-damping, small-detuning approximation the squared amplitude is replaced by f02/[4m2ω02((Ω−ω0)2+γ2)]. Its half-maximum points are Ω=ω0±γ, so their separation ΔΩ=2γ satisfies ΔΩ/ω0=1/Q. This is an identity for that approximate profile; no exact width formula for the original amplitude curve or apparatus measurement is asserted.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources