Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Heterotic Calabi–Yau bundle chiral index

Physical scope

Conditional index deduction for an actual paired gauge-adjoint matter sector in a smooth projective heterotic bundle phase, at leading tree level in the two-derivative linearized massless-mode approximation as g_str=exp(Phi_0) tends to zero and alpha-prime/L^2 tends to zero for string-frame g_L=L^2 g_0 at fixed smooth shape and holomorphic bundle. No finite-parameter error bound or persistence after corrections is claimed. It predicts the signed net index, not vector-like pairs, the full spectrum, experimental data or vacuum existence.

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be a smooth, connected, irreducible projective complex threefold with specified trivialization KX≅OX and complex orientation. For a locally free holomorphic bundle E on X, write citop(E)∈H2i(X;Z) for the topological Chern class of its underlying complex bundle, and write ciCH(E)∈Ai(X) for its algebraic Chow Chern class. Let A∗(X)Q=A∗(X)⊗Q and let deg⁡X:A3(X)Q→Q be the degree of the resulting zero-cycle class, extended rationally; this algebraic degree is distinct in definition from evaluation of a topological cohomology class on [X]. Let VR be a rank-r>0 locally free holomorphic bundle in an actual paired gauge-adjoint matter sector of the adopted post-cmp-heterotic-cohomology-spectrum-dictionary: R and R‾ are distinct conjugate representations of the unbroken gauge centralizer, and VR comes from the full structure-group multiplicity representation paired with R in the adjoint branching. Use the dictionary only at leading tree level in its two-derivative, linearized massless-mode approximation. In natural units fix a smooth internal shape metric g0, complex structure and holomorphic bundle, use the string-frame metrics gL=L2g0 and constant dimensionless dilaton Φ0, and take the joint formal limit gstr=eΦ0→0, α′/L2→0, where [L]=length and [α′]=length2. No finite-parameter error bound or persistence of unprotected massless states after corrections is asserted. Assume c1top(TX)=c1top(VR)=0,c1CH(TX)=c1CH(VR)=0 in A1(X)Q, and coherent cohomology H0(X,VR)=H3(X,VR)=0, where VR is the coherent sheaf of holomorphic sections of VR. By the Dolbeault resolution comparison in the Proof, put hq(X,VR)=dim⁡CH∂ˉq(X,VR)=dim⁡CHq(X,VR), and use the adopted chirality convention NR−NR‾=h1(X,VR)−h2(X,VR). Then NR−NR‾=−χ(X,VR)=−deg⁡X ⁣([ch⁡CH(VR)td⁡CH(TX)]3)=−12deg⁡X(c3CH(VR)). Replacing VR by its dual exchanges the representation assignment and reverses this signed index, with the same endpoint vanishings transferred by Serre duality. This index does not determine vector-like pairs or the full massless spectrum.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a smooth connected irreducible projective complex threefold X with KX≅OX; the specified leading-order joint-limit matter sector; the locally free holomorphic bundle VR and its coherent sheaf VR; the topological and Chow Chern classes typed in the Statement; and the stated endpoint and Chow-class vanishing hypotheses.

[F9]

Projective threefold coherent comparison and holomorphic bundle algebraization algebraizes the given holomorphic bundle on the actual arbitrary smooth projective threefold, uniquely up to isomorphism, and canonically identifies analytic and algebraic coherent cohomology in every degree and identifies duals. In the algebraic expressions below, VR denotes this finite locally free algebraization; its analytification is the original holomorphic section sheaf. Thus the Chow Chern classes and the input to GRR have a defined algebraic carrier. No projective-space hypothesis on X is imposed.

[F1]

Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch for projective morphisms applies to X→Spec⁡C and [VR]∈K0(X); it identifies χ(X,VR) with deg⁡X([ch⁡CH(VR)td⁡CH(TX)]3) in the rational Chow ring.

[F2]

The Chern character and the Todd class defines the Chern character and Todd class in A∗(X)Q and gives ch⁡1CH=c1CH, ch⁡2CH=12((c1CH)2−2c2CH), ch⁡3CH=16((c1CH)3−3c1CHc2CH+3c3CH), and td⁡CH=1+12c1CH+112((c1CH)2+c2CH)+124c1CHc2CH+⋯.

[F3]

Euler characteristic of a coherent sheaf defines χ(X,VR)=∑q=03(−1)qdim⁡CHq(X,VR), with finite-dimensional terms on this projective variety.

[F4]

Heterotic massless matter and bundle-cohomology dictionary adopts h1(X,VR) and h2(X,VR) as multiplicities in the paired distinct conjugate unbroken-gauge representations R and R‾, where VR is the associated bundle for the corresponding full structure-group multiplicity representation in the actual gauge-adjoint branching. This applies only in the joint weak-coupling, fixed-shape large-radius limit, at leading tree-level, two-derivative, linearized massless-mode order, with no finite-parameter error estimate or persistence claim. These physical conditions are hypotheses of this theorem, including when using the dual paired sector.

[F5]

Associated holomorphic bundle in a heterotic representation defines VR as the locally free holomorphic vector bundle in the chosen representation.

[F6]

Chern classes from the projective-bundle relation defines citop in integral singular cohomology, while Chern classes of a vector bundle on a smooth scheme defines ciCH in the algebraic Chow ring of a smooth scheme; these are distinct typed classes here.

[F7]

E-valued Dolbeault operators and their L2 structure defines the global VR-valued Dolbeault complex. In a holomorphic frame the local Dolbeault lemma The local Dolbeault lemma on nested polydiscs applies componentwise, and each sheaf of smooth VR-valued forms is acyclic by Sheaves of smooth-function modules are cohomologically acyclic. Thus the Dolbeault complex is an acyclic resolution of the original holomorphic section sheaf, identified with VRan by [F9]. Applying The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors to the global-sections functor, with the injective-resolution data defining sheaf cohomology and all successive kernel sheaves in its domain, identifies its global cohomology canonically with coherent sheaf cohomology. Its DC hypothesis is covered by the assumed AC.

[F8]

Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety gives the perfect pairings Hq(X,VR)×H3−q(X,VR∨⊗KX)→C in the stated smooth projective hypotheses.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed as an ambient mathematical hypothesis and is inherited by the exact imported GRR, coherent cohomology, and Serre-duality carriers. Its use is mathematical; no physical measurement or experimental premise enters this deduction.

[A2]

The topological equalities c1top(VR)=c1top(TX)=0, the rational Chow equalities c1CH(VR)=c1CH(TX)=0, and H0(X,VR)=H3(X,VR)=0 are explicit hypotheses. The topological vanishings alone are not used as substitutes for the Chow-class vanishings; neither is inferred merely from the phrase “Calabi–Yau.”

Proof

Given: The projective threefold, bundle and hypotheses above, with [F1]–[F9] and [A1]–[A2].

1.1givenF5F7F9algebra

First use [F9] to choose the finite locally free algebraization of the given holomorphic VR; all algebraic Chow and GRR notation refers to this algebraization. On each holomorphic coordinate polydisc with a holomorphic frame of rank r, the sheaf complex 0→O(VR)→A0,0(VR)→∂ˉVR⋯→∂ˉVRA0,3(VR)→0 is the direct sum of r scalar Dolbeault resolutions in its coefficient functions: at degree zero its kernel consists of holomorphic sections, and at every positive degree local closedness is exact by [F7] and the componentwise theorem The local Dolbeault lemma on nested polydiscs. Each A0,q(VR) is a sheaf of modules over the sheaf of smooth real functions, so it is acyclic for global sections by [F7]. The acyclic resolution theorem The acyclic-resolution theorem for right derived functors in [F7] therefore identifies the cohomology of its global-section complex, which is H∂ˉq(X,VR) by the Definition, with Hq(Xan,VRan). Combining this with [F9] gives the Dolbeault-to-algebraic-coherent comparison used below; it applies here because X is a smooth projective complex threefold and VR is holomorphic.

2.1givenF3F4A2step 1.1algebra

By [F3] and [A2], χ(X,VR)=h0−h1+h2−h3=−h1(X,VR)+h2(X,VR). The adopted assignment [F4] defines NR−NR‾=h1−h2, so NR−NR‾=−χ(X,VR).

3.1givenF1F5F9A1step 2.1

The algebraic sheaf VR is finite locally free by [F9], and its cohomology is the analytic cohomology used in step 2.1. Apply [F1] to the projective structure morphism f:X→Spec⁡C; its source and target are nonsingular irreducible quasi-projective schemes, and AC is [A1]. The Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch clause gives χ(X,VR)=deg⁡X([ch⁡CH(VR)td⁡CH(TX)]3). Combining this with step 2.1 gives the first equality in the Formula.

4.1givenF2A2step 3.1algebra

In the rational Chow ring, [F2] gives ch⁡1CH(VR)=c1CH(VR)=0, ch⁡2CH(VR)=−c2CH(VR), and ch⁡3CH(VR)=12c3CH(VR) under [A2]. The same formulas and c1CH(TX)=0 give td⁡1CH(TX)=0 and td⁡3CH(TX)=0. Therefore the codimension-three part of the product in step 3.1 is exactly ch⁡3CH(VR)=12c3CH(VR): all other degree-three summands contain either ch⁡1CH(VR), td⁡1CH(TX), or td⁡3CH(TX). Taking the Chow degree yields the second Formula equality.

5.1F2F4F8F9A2step 1.1algebra∎

The dual compatibility and cohomology comparisons of [F9] transport the algebraic Serre pairing [F8] to the original analytic bundles. This pairing, the specified trivialization KX≅OX, and the definition of VR∨ give Hq(X,VR∨)≅H3−q(X,VR)∗ for every q. Thus the assumed endpoint vanishings transfer to H0(X,VR∨)=H3(X,VR∨)=0, and h1(X,VR∨)=h2(X,VR) while h2(X,VR∨)=h1(X,VR); the adopted dictionary therefore reverses the signed multiplicity. Also the algebraic Chern roots of VR∨ are −xi when those of VR are xi, so c3CH(VR∨)=(−1)3c3CH(VR)=−c3CH(VR) by the splitting definition in [F2]. Hence the GRR expression itself changes sign as well.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources