Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Oblique-incidence TE and TM Fresnel amplitudes, the flux budget, Brewster's angle and total internal reflection

Physical scope

Conditional oblique-incidence Fresnel theorem for two homogeneous isotropic lossless scalar media at rest at a plane interface, under the stated interface identities: the TE and TM admittance systems, amplitude formulas, the flux budget R_chi+T_chi=1 in the propagating branch, the Brewster condition and the total-internal-reflection identities |r_chi|=1 with decaying transmitted field. Excluded: absorbing, dispersive, anisotropic, moving or nonlinear media, the ideal conductor, existence or uniqueness of interface-consistent data, signal- and group-velocity claims, and all empirical claims.

Statement

Assume the following plane-interface setting with the same stationary interface identities as Phase matching at a plane interface: common tangential wavevector and frequency, the reflection law and Snell's law: two homogeneous isotropic lossless scalar media at rest (medium 1 in {x3<0}, constants ε1,μ1>0; medium 2 in {x3>0}, constants ε2,μ2>0; both σ=0), the plane interface S={x3=0} with normal n=e3, and the plane-wave structure of Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch. Let ω>0, let κ∈R2 (identified with the tangential plane {x3=0}) satisfy 0<∣κ∣<K1:=ω(ε1μ1)1/2, put k13:=K12−∣κ∣2>0 and define wavevectors ki:=κ+k13 n,kr:=κ−k13 n,kt:=κ+kt3 n, where kt3∈C satisfies kt32=K22−∣κ∣2 with K2:=ω(ε2μ2)1/2 and is selected by non-growth in the x3>0 half-space: kt3=K22−∣κ∣2>0  (∣κ∣<K2),kt3=0  (∣κ∣=K2),kt3=iβ, β:=∣κ∣2−K22>0  (∣κ∣>K2). [This transmitted phase data is the interface-consistent, bounded choice: the propagating and evanescent branches of Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch(d),(e); the common (κ,ω) is declared here for each actual wave, also when a reflected amplitude is zero or the critical transmitted root is zero; the nonzero phase-matching theorem explains this matching where its hypotheses apply, and an absent reflected field has no determined phase labels.] Fix the orthonormal tangential frame κ^:=κ/∣κ∣ and y^:=n×κ^, and consider the two polarisations: (s) [transverse electric] ei=Eiy^, er=Ery^, et=Ety^ with Ei,Er,Et∈C, Ei≠0, and hj:=kj×ej/(μjω); (p) [transverse magnetic] hi=Hiy^, hr=Hry^, ht=Hty^ with Hi,Hr,Ht∈C, Hi≠0, and electric amplitudes ej:=−(kj×y^)Hj/(ωεj) (the same computation shows that in both cases the pairs satisfy the amplitude conditions of Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch(b) in their media). For each polarisation define the amplitudes along the fixed tangential directions Ej(s):=ej⋅y^ and, in the case (p), Ej(p):=ej⋅x^ with x^:=κ^; assume the four stationary interface identities of Phase matching at a plane interface: common tangential wavevector and frequency, the reflection law and Snell's law hold on R2×I for a nonempty open interval I. Then:

(a) [Amplitude system] for χ=s in every branch, and for χ=p when kt3≠0, the tangential interface identities reduce to Eiχ+Erχ=Etχ,Y1χ(Eiχ−Erχ)=Y2χEtχ, with the admittances Y1s=k13μ1ω,Y1p=ε1ωk13,Y2s=kt3μ2ω,Y2p=ε2ωkt3(kt3≠0). Write kj3:=kj⋅n for the signed components, so ki3=k13 and kr3=−k13. Here Y1χ>0 uses the positive incident normal magnitude k13, whereas the signed reflected component is kr⋅n=−k13; Y1χ is not defined from that negative component. No Y2p is defined at kt3=0. Hence, whenever Y1χ+Y2χ≠0, rχ:=ErχEiχ=Y1χ−Y2χY1χ+Y2χ,tχ:=EtχEiχ=2Y1χY1χ+Y2χ (The two-equation interface admittance system: solution formulas and the normal-flux identity(a)); the reflected and transmitted amplitude symbols are defined by these fixed-direction conventions, and sign conventions for full vector amplitudes may reverse a reflected amplitude relative to this convention.

(b) [Propagating branch and Snell's law] if ∣κ∣<K2 then all three wavevectors are real, Y1s,Y1p,Y2s,Y2p>0 are real, and with θj∈(0,π/2) defined by sin⁡θj=∣κ∣/∣kj∣ one has θr=θi and n1sin⁡θi=n2sin⁡θt, nj=c(εjμj)1/2 (Phase matching at a plane interface: common tangential wavevector and frequency, the reflection law and Snell's law(c), Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth); the period-averaged normal fluxes are Y1χ∣Eiχ∣2/2, −Y1χ∣Erχ∣2/2 and Y2χ∣Etχ∣2/2, so Rχ:=∣rχ∣2,Tχ:=Y2χY1χ∣tχ∣2,Rχ+Tχ=1.

(c) [Brewster condition] In the finite-admittance branches, rχ=0 if and only if Y1χ=Y2χ; in particular, if μ1=μ2 and ∣κ∣<K2, for unequal indices n1≠n2, rp=0 holds at exactly one admissible incidence angle θB∈(0,π/2), characterised by tan⁡θB=n2/n1, and rs≠0 at that angle. For equal indices n1=n2 (and equal permeabilities), the media are identical, Y1χ=Y2χ and rs=rp=0, ts=tp=1 for every allowed incidence angle; there is no unique distinguished Brewster angle.

(d) [Total internal reflection] if ∣κ∣>K2 (which requires n1>n2, θi:=arcsin⁡(∣κ∣/K1)∈(0,π/2), ∣κ∣=K1sin⁡θi and θi>θc:=arcsin⁡(n2/n1)), then Y2s=iβ/(μ2ω) and Y2p=−iε2ω/β are purely imaginary, ∣rs∣=∣rp∣=1,ts,tp≠0,∣tχ∣2=4(Y1χ)2(Y1χ)2+∣Y2χ∣2>0, the transmitted field decays as e−βx3 and its period-averaged normal flux vanishes identically while its tangential averaged flux does not vanish (Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch(e)); the reflected wave carries the whole incident normal averaged flux.

(e) [Critical angle] if ∣κ∣=K2 then kt3=0: the transmitted wave travels along the interface, its tangential electric amplitude vanishes in the (p) case and Y2s=0 in the (s) case, and rs=1, ts=2, rp=−1, tp=0 with vanishing transmitted normal averaged flux. The critical TM branch is solved from the nonsingular equations Eip+Erp=kt3Ht/(ωε2)=0 and Hi+Hr=Ht, not by dividing by kt3; they give Hr=Hi and Ht=2Hi. The transmitted TM electric vector can have a nonzero normal component even though its tangential amplitude is zero.

(f) [Scope] the statements are conditional on the interface identities and on the given wave data; no existence or uniqueness of interface-consistent data is claimed. Excluded: anisotropic media, complex ε or μ and absorption in either medium (only the lossless dielectric case with the evanescent transmitted branch is covered), dispersive media, moving media, the ideal conductor, nonlinear response, and all claims about signal speeds, group velocities, information transfer or empirical data. The statements for Y1χ+Y2χ=0 (which cannot occur in the stated branches, where Re⁡Y1χ>0 and Re⁡Y2χ≥0) are excluded; the notation 'angle of refraction' is used only where kt is real.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two-media lossless setting of the Statement, its common (κ,ω) and wavevectors ki,kr,kt, the two polarisation data families, and the four stationary interface identities [A1] on R2×I.

[A1]

The four stationary interface identities of Phase matching at a plane interface: common tangential wavevector and frequency, the reflection law and Snell's law hold for all (y,t)∈R2×I.

[F1]

Plane-wave structure (Plane-wave fields in a homogeneous Ohmic medium: amplitude conditions, dispersion, averaged flux and the evanescent branch): the amplitude conditions kj⋅ej=0, kj×ej=ωμjhj, kj⋅hj=0, kj⋅kj=εjμjω2 and the solution form hj=kj×ej/(μjω); the lossless pointwise identities B=k^×E/v and period-averaged flux ⟨S⟩=∣e∣2k/(2μω) for real k; and, in the evanescent branch, the factorization with decay e−βn′⋅x, the vanishing normal averaged flux and the positive tangential averaged fluxes for the two transverse polarisations.

[F2]

The angle laws (Phase matching at a plane interface: common tangential wavevector and frequency, the reflection law and Snell's law(c)): for real wavevectors at a lossless interface, θr=θi and n1sin⁡θi=n2sin⁡θt with the same angle conventions, together with the parameters vj and nj=c/vj of Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth.

[F3]

Admittance algebra (The two-equation interface admittance system: solution formulas and the normal-flux identity): (a) the solution formulas for the two-equation system; (b) for real Y1>0 the identity ∣r∣2+(Re⁡Y2/Y1)∣t∣2=1 with ∣t∣2=4Y12/∣Y1+Y2∣2>0; (c) for real Y1>0 and purely imaginary Y2 the identities ∣r∣=1 and ∣t∣2=4Y12/(Y12+∣Y2∣2)>0; (d) the real-positive specialisation agreeing with The two-equation interface system at normal incidence.

[F4]

Period averages (Period averages of products of real parts of complex exponentials) and the stored-energy/flux definitions u=12(E⋅D+B⋅H), S=E×H of Energy balance and Ohmic dissipation for the constant nondispersive linear model.

[F5]

Geometry of the fixed frame: x^=κ^=κ/∣κ∣, y^=n×κ^, with the right-handed orthonormal triad relations x^×y^=n, y^×n=x^, n×x^=y^ and the reversed signs; the cross product is bilinear with ⟨u×v,w⟩=det⁡[u v w], and u×v is orthogonal to u and v (The cross product in R3, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors).

[F6]

Medium parameters (Homogeneous isotropic medium parameters: phase speed, impedance, refractive index, complex propagation constant and skin depth): Kj=ω(εjμj)1/2, vj=(εjμj)−1/2, nj=c(εjμj)1/2. The wavevector definitions and selected roots in this item's Statement give k132=K12−∣κ∣2 and kt32=K22−∣κ∣2 with its declared branch selection.

[F8]

Trigonometry: sin⁡(arcsin⁡y)=y with sine strictly increasing on [−π/2,π/2] (Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine); tan⁡ restricts to a strictly increasing bijection (−π/2,π/2)→R with the principal inverse (The principal inverse tangent arctan⁡:R→(−π/2,π/2)); tan⁡x=sin⁡x/cos⁡x (Tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant on their exact natural domains); sin⁡2x+cos⁡2x=1 with 1+tan⁡2x=sec⁡2x (Pythagorean and parity identities for all six trigonometric functions on their natural domains); sine is strictly increasing on [0,π/2] and cosine strictly decreasing on [0,π] with sin⁡0=0, cos⁡0=1 and cos⁡(π/2)=0 (Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi).

Proof

technique · direct; verify the amplitude conditions for the two polarisation families, reduce the tangential interface identities to scalar admittance systems in the fixed frame, and read off the propagating, Brewster, evanescent and critical cases from the admittance algebra and the medium plane-wave structure
1.1givenF1F5F7algebra

[Both polarisation families satisfy the amplitude conditions] For (s), kj⋅ej=Ej kj⋅y^=0 because kj=κ+kj3n and y^⊥κ,n; and kj×ej=Ejkj×y^=Ej(κ×y^+kj3n×y^)=Ej(∣κ∣n−kj3x^) by [F5], which equals ωμjhj with hj=kj×ej/(μjω) by definition. For (p), ej=−(kj×y^)Hj/(ωεj) and kj⋅ej=0 because kj⋅(kj×y^)=0 by the orthogonality in [F5]; further kj×ej=−(kj×(kj×y^))Hj/(ωεj)=[(kj⋅kj)y^−kj(kj⋅y^)]Hj/(ωεj)=(εjμjω2)y^Hj/(ωεj)=ωμjHjy^=ωμjhj, using kj⋅y^=0 and kj⋅kj=εjμjω2 of [F1]. In (s), kj⋅hj=0 by cross-product orthogonality, and kj×hj=−ωεjej follows by expanding kj×(kj×ej)=kj(kj⋅ej)−(kj⋅kj)ej and using dispersion. In (p), kj⋅hj=0 because y^ is perpendicular to kj, and kj×hj=−ωεjej is the definition of ej. Thus all four amplitude conditions hold in both families, including zero reflected or transmitted amplitudes.

2.1givenA1step 1.1F5F7algebra

[The tangential interface identities in the fixed frame] By the orthogonal decomposition of [F5], the tangential parts of the electric amplitudes are: for (s), ejτ=ej=Ejy^; for (p), ejτ=(kj3Hj/(ωεj))x^ because ej=(kj3x^−∣κ∣n)Hj/(ωεj) from kj×y^=∣κ∣n−kj3x^ by [F5]. The magnetic tangential traces are obtained as follows: hj=Hjy^ in (p), and in (s) hj=Ej(κ×y^+kj3n×y^)/(μjω)=Ej(∣κ∣n−kj3x^)/(μjω) with tangential part −kj3Ejx^/(μjω) and, for the reflected wave with kr3=−k13, tangential part +k13Erx^/(μ1ω). Since the interface identities hold for all (y,t) with the common (κ,ω), each has the form Re⁡(Wei(κ⋅y−ωt))=0 for a constant tangential vector W. Since n=e3, n×(w1,w2,0)=(−w2,w1,0), so the cross-product trace identities are equivalent to these real-part identities. Fixing any y and allowing t to vary in I, the time-line proof of the amplitude-vanishing clause (a) of [F1] gives W=0. Concretely: the tangential electric identity gives Ei+Er=Et in (s) and Ei(p)+Er(p)=Et(p) in (p); the tangential magnetic identity gives kt3Et/(μ2ω)=k13(Ei−Er)/(μ1ω) in (s) and Hi+Hr=Ht in (p), where Ej(p)=kj3Hj/(ωεj) by definition, and when kt3≠0, converting Hj=YjpEj(p) for j=i,t and Hr=−Y1pEr(p) (the reflected sign entering through kr3=−k13) turns the last identity into Y1p(Ei(p)−Er(p))=Y2pEt(p). Writing Y1s=k13/(μ1ω), Y2s=kt3/(μ2ω), Y1p=ε1ω/k13 and Y2p=ε2ω/kt3 when kt3≠0 gives the two systems of (a).

3.1step 2.1F3F7algebra

[Solution of the systems, part (a)] In the (s) branch, Y1s>0 is real and positive, and Y2s is real positive for ∣κ∣<K2, zero at the critical point, and iβ/(μ2ω) for ∣κ∣>K2; in every case Re⁡(Y1s+Y2s)=Y1s+Re⁡Y2s≥Y1s>0, so Y1s+Y2s≠0. In the (p) branch with kt3≠0, Re⁡Y1p=Y1p>0 and Re⁡Y2p=0 or >0, so again Y1p+Y2p≠0. The admittance lemma F3 therefore applies to each scalar system of step 2.1 and gives rχ=(Y1χ−Y2χ)/(Y1χ+Y2χ) and tχ=2Y1χ/(Y1χ+Y2χ); in particular tχ≠0 because its numerator 2Y1χ≠0.

3.2step 2.1F4F5F6F7algebra

[Critical angle, part (e)] Let ∣κ∣=K2; then kt3=0 by [F6], so Y2s=0 and no Y2p is defined (a division by kt3 is not performed). For (s), the system of step 2.1 reads Ei+Er=Et and Y1s(Ei−Er)=0 with Y1s>0, so Er=Ei and Et=2Ei, i.e. rs=1 and ts=2. For (p), Et(p)=kt3Ht/(ωε2)=0 and Ei(p)=k13Hi/(ωε1), Er(p)=−k13Hr/(ωε1) by the fixed-direction definitions of step 2.1; the tangential electric identity Ei(p)+Er(p)=0 gives Hr=Hi, and the tangential magnetic identity Hi+Hr=Ht gives Ht=2Hi; hence rp=Er(p)/Ei(p)=−Hr/Hi=−1 and tp=Et(p)/Ei(p)=0. The transmitted normal averaged flux vanishes: ⟨St⋅n⟩=12Re⁡((et×h‾t)⋅n) by [F4], and with ht=Hty^ and et=−(kt×y^)Ht/(ωε2)=−∣κ∣Htn/(ωε2) (because kt=κ and κ×y^=∣κ∣n by [F5]), the vector et×h‾t is a multiple of n×y^, which is orthogonal to n: (et×h‾t)⋅n=0. In the TE case et=Ety^ and ht=∣κ∣Etn/(μ2ω), so et×h‾t is tangential and its normal component is also zero. The transmitted TM electric vector −∣κ∣Htn/(ωε2) has a nontrivial normal component whenever Ht≠0.

4.1step 3.1F1F2F3F6F8algebra

[Propagating branch: angles and fluxes, part (b)] Let ∣κ∣<K2. Then kt3=K22−∣κ∣2>0 and all three wavevectors are real by [F6]; the four admittances of step 2.1 are real and positive. With ∣ki∣=∣kr∣=K1 and ∣kt∣=K2 from ∣kj∣2=∣κ∣2+kj32, the angles θj:=arcsin⁡(∣κ∣/∣kj∣)∈(0,π/2) are well defined by [F8] since 0<∣κ∣<min⁡{K1,K2}; then sin⁡θr=∣κ∣/K1=sin⁡θi, so θr=θi by the strict increase of sine and of arcsin⁡ in [F8], and K1sin⁡θi=∣κ∣=K2sin⁡θt, which is n1sin⁡θi=n2sin⁡θt after multiplying by c/ω and using nj=cKj/ω=c(εjμj)1/2 by [F6]; this is the same angle law as [F2]. The period-averaged normal fluxes: for (s), the flux of [F1] is ⟨Sj⟩=∣ej∣2kj/(2μjω) with ∣ej∣2=∣Ej(s)∣2 and kj⋅n=kj3, so the normal fluxes are kj3∣Ej(s)∣2/(2μjω), i.e. Y1s∣Ei(s)∣2/2, −Y1s∣Er(s)∣2/2, Y2s∣Et(s)∣2/2; for (p) the same ⟨Sj⋅n⟩=∣ej∣2kj3/(2μjω) equals Yjp ∣Ej(p)∣2/2 up to the reflected sign, because ∣ej∣2=μj∣Hj∣2/εj and ∣Ej(p)∣=∣kj3∣∣Hj∣/(εjω) give ∣ej∣2kj3/(2μjω)=kj3∣Hj∣2/(2εjω) for the incident and transmitted signs, while the reflected signed component kr3=−k13 produces the minus sign, as in the Statement. With Rχ=∣rχ∣2=∣Erχ∣2/∣Eiχ∣2 and Tχ=(Y2χ/Y1χ)∣tχ∣2=Y2χ∣Etχ∣2/(Y1χ∣Eiχ∣2), the budget Rχ+Tχ=1 is F3 applied with the real positive Y1χ,Y2χ.

4.2step 3.1F1F3F6F7algebra

[Total internal reflection, part (d)] Let ∣κ∣>K2; then K2<K1, so n2<n1, and kt3=iβ with β=∣κ∣2−K22>0 by [F6]. Hence Y2s=kt3/(μ2ω)=iβ/(μ2ω) and Y2p=ε2ω/(iβ)=−iε2ω/β are purely imaginary by [F7], while Y1χ>0 is real; the admittance lemma F3 gives ∣rs∣=∣rp∣=1 and ∣tχ∣2=4(Y1χ)2/((Y1χ)2+∣Y2χ∣2)>0, so tχ≠0. The transmitted wave is the evanescent branch of [F1] with n′=n, κ0=κ and kt⋅kt=K22=ε2μ2ω2: the field factorizes with the decay factor e−βx3, its period-averaged normal flux vanishes identically, and its tangential averaged flux is strictly positive; since ∣rχ∣=1, the reflected normal averaged flux equals minus the incident normal averaged flux, i.e. the reflected wave carries the whole incident normal averaged flux.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1F3F6F8algebra

[Brewster condition, part (c)] In each finite-admittance branch the formula of step 3.1 gives rχ=0 exactly when the numerator Y1χ−Y2χ vanishes, i.e. Y1χ=Y2χ. Assume now μ1=μ2=:μ and ∣κ∣<K2, so that the (p) admittances are real positive. The condition Y1p=Y2p reads ε1/k13=ε2/kt3; substituting εj=nj2/(c2μ) and kj3=(ωnj/c)cos⁡θj (from k13=K1cos⁡θi=(ωn1/c)cos⁡θi and kt3=K2cos⁡θt=(ωn2/c)cos⁡θt) gives n1cos⁡θt=n2cos⁡θi. Together with Snell's law n1sin⁡θi=n2sin⁡θt of step 4.1, squaring both and eliminating sin⁡2θt gives (n12−n22)[n22−(n12+n22)sin⁡2θi]=0: indeed n12(1−sin⁡2θt)=n22cos⁡2θi and sin⁡θt=(n1/n2)sin⁡θi yield n12n22−n14sin⁡2θi=n24−n24sin⁡2θi, i.e. n22(n12−n22)=(n12−n22)(n12+n22)sin⁡2θi. If n1≠n2, division by the nonzero first factor gives sin⁡2θi=n22/(n12+n22); since 0<θi<π/2 and sine is strictly increasing on [0,π/2] with sin⁡0=0 by [F8], this determines the unique admissible angle θB:=arcsin⁡(n2/n12+n22)∈(0,π/2), This angle is admissible: with D:=n12+n22, its tangential wavenumber is K1n2/D<K2 because n1/D<1. Snell's law therefore gives sin⁡θt=n1/D and, by positivity of both cosines and the Pythagorean identity, cos⁡θi=n1/D, cos⁡θt=n2/D. Thus n1cos⁡θt=n2cos⁡θi, establishing Y1p=Y2p and rp=0; this proves sufficiency as well as uniqueness. At this angle cos⁡θB>0: cosine is strictly decreasing on [0,π] with cos⁡(π/2)=0 by [F8], so 0<θB<π/2 gives cos⁡θB>cos⁡(π/2)=0. The Pythagorean identity of [F8] then gives cos⁡θB=1−sin⁡2θB=n1/n12+n22, so tan⁡θB=sin⁡θB/cos⁡θB=n2/n1 by the definition of tangent in [F8]; no other admissible angle has this tangent, because tangent is strictly increasing on (0,π/2) by [F8]. Also rs≠0 at θB, because Y1s=Y2s would give k13=kt3 (the μ factors being equal), hence K12=∣κ∣2+k132=∣κ∣2+kt32=K22 and n1=n2, contrary to hypothesis. If instead n1=n2 and μ1=μ2 then ε1=ε2 and the two media are identical: k13=kt3 and ε1=ε2 give Y1χ=Y2χ, so rs=rp=0 and ts=tp=1 at every admissible angle (where the (p) formula applies), with no distinguished Brewster angle.

6.1givenstep 3.2F1F3F9∎

[Scope, part (f)] All clauses are conditional on the given wave data and the interface identities [A1]; the argument used the amplitude conditions and solution structure of [F1], the admittance algebra [F3], the angle conventions of [F2] and [F8], the period averages and stored-energy flux of [F4], and the complex arithmetic of [F7]; the ideal-conductor limit, absorption, dispersion, anisotropy, moving and nonlinear media, signal-speed and group-velocity statements and all empirical claims are excluded. The denominator Y1χ+Y2χ is nonzero in every considered branch because Re⁡Y1χ>0 and Re⁡Y2χ≥0; the interface identities are stated hypotheses on the noncompact plane (for compact interfaces, Stationary macroscopic interface jump conditions for D, B, E and H), and no choice principle is used, all constructions being finite-dimensional algebra in the given data.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources