How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scope of the symplectic and canonical methods for a potential presentation: locality of generating functions, projections and determinant tests, absent global claims, and empirical status
Scope of the symplectic and canonical machinery for the declared potential presentation, with Cartesian phase domains open in and generalized-coordinate phase domains open in : the local character of generating functions and their projection hypotheses, the determinant tests and the failure of canonicity for volume-preserving maps in dimension at least four, the absence of global generating functions in general, the local-in-time character of flow preservation, the choice assumptions in the measure-theoretic volume statement and the cited cylinder construction, and the purely conditional empirical status of the whole page. The split numerical maps are local canonical transformations on nonempty admissible domains; surjectivity onto an entire declared target phase domain is not asserted. The remark asserts no mathematical claim beyond the items it cites.
Scope of the page
-
Locality in time. Flow preservation, bracket preservation and volume preservation are asserted on the actual time-slice domains supplied by the dependence theorem, not on the whole phase domain (The Hamiltonian evolution of a potential presentation preserves the two-form, the bracket and the determinant on its actual time-slice domains, also when the Hamiltonian depends on time, Liouville's theorem for a potential presentation: the phase-volume form and the Lebesgue measure in each canonical chart are preserved by the Hamiltonian evolution on its actual domains). No completeness of the model's Hamiltonian flow is claimed, and the maximal existence of the model's motions remains the business of the model's own initial-value theory (Hamilton's equations of the mechanical presentation are equivalent to the model's equation of motion, with residual forces as momentum sources and the coordinate form on every chart).
-
Determinant tests. For a map between equal-dimensional phase domains, canonicity is equivalent to the square matrix identity in canonical coordinates, and then (Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ). In dimension with the chart half-dimension, that determinant condition is necessary but not sufficient: the companion page records a volume-preserving shear of a four-dimensional phase domain that fails the fundamental bracket ; for a single degree of freedom the symplectic test is exactly ; absolute determinant also permits orientation-reversing, antisymplectic maps. Between different dimensions the determinant is not defined; use the rectangular condition of Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests.
-
Projections and caustics. A first-kind generating function exists locally only when the -projection of the canonical map is invertible, and the second kind requires the corresponding projection (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, A canonical map with invertible -projection is locally generated by a first-kind generating function). At points where the required projection degenerates, the whole representation of Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian breaks down even though the map remains canonical; the companion page carries a point transformation whose -projection is degenerate identically.
-
Symplectic map versus globally exact generating function. Canonicity is a local condition on ; it does not imply the existence of a globally defined real generating function. Under the Axiom of Countable Choice () retained by the cited torus construction, the model-free witness is the cylinder and its shift for a fixed real . With the descended forms and defined in lift charts, it preserves and changes by the closed, non-exact form , so its local generating functions do not glue to a global one (The symplectic shift of the cylinder changes by the closed, non-exact form and has no global generating function, Scope of the canonical-methods items: locality and topology of generating functions, caustics, and the E7 claims delivered by published root items). The presentation's Cartesian phase domains are open subsets of ; a generalized-coordinate phase domain is open in , including . These domains need not be simply connected, so no global generating-function existence is claimed here; conversely a momentum shift in Euclidean coordinates has a global second-kind generating function and a degenerate first-kind projection.
-
Choice assumptions. The explicit phase-chart form calculations, canonical matrix tests and local generating-function calculations use no choice principle. The cylinder obstruction above retains from The symplectic shift of the cylinder changes by the closed, non-exact form and has no global generating function's torus supplier; no choice-free version of that supplier is asserted here. The measure-theoretic volume statement also assumes Countable Choice where the change-of-variables theorem requires it (Liouville's theorem for a potential presentation: the phase-volume form and the Lebesgue measure in each canonical chart are preserved by the Hamiltonian evolution on its actual domains, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). A separate direct integration argument for an explicit bounded region can avoid that change-of-variables use only when its own mathematical suppliers require no choice assumption.
-
Numerics. The drift, kick and velocity-Verlet maps of the mechanical splitting are local canonical transformations in exact arithmetic on nonempty admissible domains (The drift, kick and velocity-Verlet maps are canonical: and ). Restricting the target to each map's open image gives a canonical transformation onto that image; no surjectivity onto the entire declared target phase domain is asserted. The scope of the certified numerical estimates, including roundoff and the absence of all-time energy claims, is recorded in Scope of the certified velocity-Verlet estimates: exact arithmetic, compact tubes, roundoff, and absent all-time claims and is not extended by this page.
-
Empirical status. Every item of this page is a conditional consequence of the adopted force branch, the declared potential presentation, the declared chart and the cited mathematics. No experimental result, measured constant or statistical claim is used, and none is implied; in particular no statement here identifies the model's phase volume with an observable quantity. Units are those of Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework throughout, and the generalized-coordinate charts remain those of Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces.
Depends on
The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart
The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: and
Canonical coordinates and the canonical form of the two-form for a potential presentation: the coordinate expression with the chart's half-dimension, and the model's own momentum charts
The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field with , and for the branch Hamiltonian
The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart
The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field
Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: , the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals
Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests
The Hamiltonian evolution of a potential presentation preserves the two-form, the bracket and the determinant on its actual time-slice domains, also when the Hamiltonian depends on time
Equal-dimensional canonical transformations of a potential presentation conjugate Hamiltonian fields and transport systems and brackets
Liouville's theorem for a potential presentation: the phase-volume form and the Lebesgue measure in each canonical chart are preserved by the Hamiltonian evolution on its actual domains
Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian
A curve solves Hamilton's equations if and only if its velocity annihilates , with the three coordinate components computed
A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to
The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical local diffeomorphism
A canonical map with invertible -projection is locally generated by a first-kind generating function
A time-dependent generating function produces canonical time slices and shifts the Hamiltonian by
The symplectic shift of the cylinder changes by the closed, non-exact form and has no global generating function
Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map
Scope of the canonical-methods items: locality and topology of generating functions, caustics, and the E7 claims delivered by published root items
The drift, kick and velocity-Verlet maps are canonical: and
Scope of the certified velocity-Verlet estimates: exact arithmetic, compact tubes, roundoff, and absent all-time claims
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions
Hamilton's equations of the mechanical presentation are equivalent to the model's equation of motion, with residual forces as momentum sources and the coordinate form on every chart
Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework
Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 printing), Sections 4.2, 4.4.1 and 4.4.3, printed pages 88-92 and 102-105 (PDF pages 94-98 and 108-111): the local character of canonical transformations and generating functions, and the absence of any completeness claim for the Hamiltonian flow
- G. J. Sussman and J. Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, second edition (MIT Press, 2014/2015), Sections 5.3-5.4: canonical transformations preserve phase volume and the bracket, while generating functions describe the transformation only on regions where the required coordinate projection is nondegenerate