Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equal-dimensional canonical transformations of a potential presentation conjugate Hamiltonian fields and transport systems and brackets

Physical scope

Transformation theory for equal-dimensional local canonical transformations of the declared potential presentation: a C2 local diffeomorphism preserving the two-form conjugates the Hamiltonian field of a phase function to the field of the composed function, preserves the model's Poisson bracket under composition, and carries solutions of one Hamiltonian system to solutions of the other, also for time-dependent Hamiltonians. No such ambient field-transport result is asserted for a lower-dimensional symplectic immersion. The statement is a conditional deduction from the adopted force branch, the declared presentation and the cited mathematics; it asserts no empirical content or global existence.

Statement

Adopt the force model with potential presentation (U,d) and mechanical Lagrangian L=K−U of The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions, with the momentum charts and two-form datum of The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, the canonical coordinates of Canonical coordinates and the canonical form of the two-form for a potential presentation: the coordinate expression ω=∑a=1mdθa∧dθm+a with m the chart's half-dimension, and the model's own momentum charts, the Hamiltonian fields of The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian, the bracket of The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: {f,g}=ω(Xf,Xg) and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart and the canonical maps of Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests (Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance, Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework). Let W1,W2 be nonempty open subsets of phase domains of the same dimension 2n, and let C:W1→W2 be a C2 local diffeomorphism with C∗ω2=ω1, hence an equal-dimensional local canonical transformation in the sense of Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests. Let H:I0×W2→R be of class C2; write H∘C for the function (t,z)↦H(t,C(z)) on I0×W1. Then:

  1. (field transport) For every C2 function f on W2 and every z∈W1,

DC(z) Xf∘C(z)=Xf(C(z)),

i.e. C conjugates the Hamiltonian field of f∘C on W1 to the field of f on W2. 2. (bracket invariance) For all C2 functions f,g on W2,

{f∘C, g∘C}={f,g}∘Con W1,

so the bracket of the presentation is invariant under canonical maps. 3. (transport of solutions) Let J⊆I0 be a nonempty open interval and let z:J→W1 be a C1 curve. Then z solves z˙(t)=X(H∘C)t(z(t)) if and only if t↦C(z(t)) solves w˙(t)=XHt(w(t)) on J: the canonical map carries the Hamiltonian system of H∘C to that of H, with time dependence allowed. 4. (instances) Genuine transitions between full-dimensional (r=3N) charts of the presentation and the maps generated by first- and second-kind generating functions satisfy these transport conclusions. A fixed time-slice map Φt∗ of The Hamiltonian evolution of a potential presentation preserves the two-form, the bracket and the determinant on its actual time-slice domains, also when the Hamiltonian depends on time is an additional instance for clauses 1-2 when it has C2 regularity, with Φt∗ held fixed as the coordinate map. The flow-preservation theorem under its stated C2 Hamiltonian hypothesis guarantees only C1 regularity; this item makes no field-transport claim for a slice known only to be C1, and does not treat the moving family t↦Φt as a single time-dependent coordinate transformation.

The statement is conditional on the adopted force branch, the declared presentation and the cited mathematics; it asserts no empirical content and no global existence of canonical maps.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The presentation with its two-form, canonical charts, fields and bracket, a C2 canonical map C:W1→W2, a C2 function H on I0×W2, and a C1 curve z in W1.

[F1]

Canonical maps, fields and brackets (Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian, The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, Canonical coordinates and the canonical form of the two-form for a potential presentation: the coordinate expression ω=∑a=1mdθa∧dθm+a with m the chart's half-dimension, and the model's own momentum charts, The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: {f,g}=ω(Xf,Xg) and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart, A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH, The Hamiltonian field of a C2 function on a phase domain is J∇H, and the Poisson bracket is ∑i(∂qif ∂pig−∂pif ∂qig), A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form, The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field): C is C2 between phase domains of the same dimension, is a local diffeomorphism and satisfies C∗ω2=ω1, equivalently DC(z)TJn DC(z)=Jn for every z, so DC(z) is invertible and DC(z)JnDC(z)T=Jn; the field of a C2 function f is Xf=Jn∇f in a canonical chart and satisfies DC Xf∘C=Xf∘C; the bracket is {f,g}=∇fTJn∇g.

[F3]

Curves and equations (First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals, Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential): a C1 curve solves the Hamiltonian system of the given C2 function H exactly when its velocity equals XHt at its points. Identification with Cartesian model motions on d≡0 requires the mechanical branch Hamiltonian H(t,x,p)=12p⋅M−1p+U(t,x); its first equation gives p=Mx′ and hence x∈C2. For the generalized-coordinate mechanical Hamiltonian, clause 2 of the cited theorem retains the residual generalized force Qres in the momentum equation. Thus its integral curves coincide with the declared Lagrange equations only when Qres vanishes along the curve, in particular on d≡0; otherwise those equations are the forced Hamilton system. No identification with model motions is asserted for an arbitrary H.

[F4]

Generated and chart maps (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical C2 local diffeomorphism, The Euclidean inverse function theorem, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: ΦX∗λ=∑Pa dqa and ΦX∗ω=∑dqa∧dPa): first- and second-kind data are C3 functions S on nonempty open product domains with invertible mixed Hessian SqQ or SqP. They define p=Sq, P=−SQ or p=Sq, Q=SP by local inversion of the relation map Ψ=(q,Sq). The mathematical proposition proves their standard-form pullback identity. Its C2 inverse regularity follows directly: the C1 local inverse g satisfies Dg=(DΨ∘g)−1, which is C1 by the cofactor-over-determinant formula, since DΨ and g are C1. Hence the generated map is C2. These maps are instances here on branches with source and target in the declared presentation domains, as required by the given C:W1→W2; the mathematical proposition does not assert physical-domain containment. Genuine full-dimensional momentum-chart transitions are C2 and preserve the source and target forms by clauses 2-3 of the two-form theorem.

Proof

technique · direct. Transport the matrix identity to $DC\,J\,DC^{\mathsf T}=J$, compute the bracket of composed functions, and carry the field equation along the map by the chain rule
1.1F1F2algebra

By [F1] the map C satisfies DCTJn DC=Jn everywhere and DC is invertible; taking inverses of the identity gives DC−1Jn−1DC−T=Jn−1, that is DC−1Jn DC−T=Jn because Jn−1=−Jn, and multiplying on the left by DC and on the right by DCT gives DC Jn DCT=Jn.

1.2F1

By [F1] the fields satisfy DC Xf∘C=Xf∘C for every C2 function f on W2; this is clause 1.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

Bracket invariance: for C2 functions f,g on W2, the chain rule of [F2] gives ∇(f∘C)(z)=DC(z)T∇f(C(z)) and ∇(g∘C)(z)=DC(z)T∇g(C(z)), so {f∘C,g∘C}(z)=∇f(C(z))TDC(z)J DC(z)T∇g(C(z))=∇f(C(z))TJ∇g(C(z))={f,g}(C(z)) by step 1.1 and the bracket formula of [F1]; this is clause 2.

2.2step 1.2F2F3algebra

Transport of solutions, forward direction: if z solves z˙=XHt∘C(z), then w:=C∘z has w˙=DC(z) z˙=DC(z) XHt∘C(z)=XHt(C(z)) by the chain rule of [F2] and the field transport of step 1.2, so w solves the H-system.

3.1step 1.2step 2.2F1F2F4

Transport of solutions, converse: if w=C∘z solves the H-system, then w˙=XHt(w) and, DC(z) being invertible by [F1], z˙=DC(z)−1w˙=DC(z)−1XHt(C(z))=XHt∘C(z) by step 1.2 applied to DC XHt∘C=XHt∘C; hence z solves the system of H∘C, proving clause 3 in both directions. For clause 4, [F4] supplies the C2 regularity and canonicity of genuine full-dimensional chart transitions and first- and second-kind generated maps on their admissible presentation domains. Applying clauses 1-3 to each such fixed map gives the stated instances. A flow slice is included only as a fixed map when it has that same C2 regularity; the moving time-dependent family is not covered by this fixed-map theorem.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

Collection: clause 1 is steps 1.1-1.2, clause 2 is step 2.1, clause 3 is steps 2.2 and 3.1, and clause 4 applies to the stated full-dimensional transitions and generating-function maps, plus any flow slice that independently has the required C2 regularity; this proves the theorem.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources