Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kelvin circulation: the circulation around a C1 material loop is constant in the barotropic inviscid model

Statement

Let O⊆R3 be open, let I⊆R be a nonempty open interval, let u:I×O→R3 and ρ:I×O→(0,∞) be C1, let p:(0,∞)→R be C1 on the positive density interval (0,∞), with enthalpy h(r):=∫1rp′(s)/s ds for r>0 as in Incompressible Newtonian and barotropic inviscid fluid constitutive models, and let V:I×O→R be C1, with the barotropic inviscid stress σ=−p(ρ)I3; assume the local equations (M) of Barotropic inviscid momentum in gradient form, Bernoulli along streamlines and the irrotational constant on I×O:

∂tρ+div⁡(ρu)=0,ρ Dtu=ρ(−∇V)+g,gi=∑j∂jσij,

so that, by part (i) of that theorem, Dtu=−∇(h(ρ)+V) on I×O.

Let t0<t1 with [t0,t1]⊆I and let γ:[t0,t1]×[0,1]→O be C1 with

γ(t,0)=γ(t,1)and∂tγ(t,s)=u(t,γ(t,s))((t,s)∈[t0,t1]×[0,1]).

Here C1 on the closed parameter rectangle means that γ is continuous and its first partial derivatives exist and are continuous there, with one-sided derivatives on the edges.

Then the circulation

Γ(t):=∫01∑i=13ui(t,γ(t,s)) ∂sγi(t,s) ds

is constant on [t0,t1]. The integral is an ordinary Riemann integral of a continuous real function; a singleton time interval has a trivially constant circulation and requires no time differentiation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The fields u,ρ,p,V and the local equation; the material loop γ.

[F1]

By Barotropic inviscid momentum in gradient form, Bernoulli along streamlines and the irrotational constant(i), Dtu=−∇(h(ρ)+V) on I×O; the enthalpy satisfies h∈C1.

[F4]

If g and ∂tg are continuous on a compact rectangle, FTC gives h−1(g(t+h,s)−g(t,s))=h−1∫tt+h∂tg(τ,s)dτ. Uniform continuity makes these quotients converge uniformly in s to ∂tg(t,s); the uniform integral-error bound therefore gives ddt∫g(t,s)ds=∫∂tg(t,s)ds. The same argument with the coordinate roles exchanged permits differentiation in s of ∫t0tU(τ,s)dτ when U and ∂sU are continuous; endpoints use one-sided derivatives (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous, Uniformly close integrable functions have integrals differing by at most the interval length times their uniform error).

Proof

technique · direct; differentiate the parameterized circulation and recognize the integrand as a total $s$-derivative
1.1givenF2F4algebra

Put U(t,s):=u(t,γ(t,s)). The chain rule makes U a C1 map, with ∂tU=∂tu+(Du)∂tγ and ∂sU=(Du)∂sγ. Although γ is only assumed C1, its material equation supplies the needed mixed derivative: from γ(t,s)=γ(t0,s)+∫t0tU(τ,s) dτ, differentiating in s gives ∂sγ(t,s)=∂sγ(t0,s)+∫t0t∂sU(τ,s) dτ by [F4]. Therefore ∂t∂sγ=∂sU=(Du)∂sγ, continuously. Thus the circulation integrand U⋅∂sγ has a continuous time derivative, and [F4] gives Γ′(t)=∫01[(∂tu+(Du)∂tγ)⋅∂sγ+u⋅(Du)∂sγ]ds for t in the time interior.

2.1step 1.1F2F3algebra

Since ∂tγ=u(t,γ), the first term in step 1.1 is (∂tu+(Du)u)⋅∂sγ=(Dtu)⋅∂sγ. The second term is exactly u⋅(Du)∂sγ=∂s(12∣u(t,γ)∣22) by the chain rule and [F3]. Hence Γ′(t)=∫01[(Dtu)⋅∂sγ+∂s(12∣u∣22)]ds. No equality between (Du)u and (Du)Tu, and no symmetry of Du, is used.

3.1step 2.1F1F2F5algebra∎

Substituting [F1], Γ′(t)=∫01[−∇(h(ρ)+V)⋅∂sγ+∂s12∣u∣22]ds=−∫01∂s[(h(ρ)+V)(t,γ(t,s))]ds+[12∣u∣22]s=0s=1 by the chain rule [F2] and the fundamental theorem [F5]. Since γ(t,1)=γ(t,0), both boundary terms vanish, so Γ′(t)=0 for every t∈(t0,t1); [F4] also gives continuous one-sided endpoint derivatives, so The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a) yields Γ(t)−Γ(t0)=∫t0tΓ′(τ) dτ=0 on [t0,t1].

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources