Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

H theorem and Maxwellian equality for the regular cutoff model

Statement

Assume ACω, v0>0, λ>0, u∈R3, and positive velocity-squared parameters 0<a<b. Let

f0(v)=12γaI,u(v)+12γbI,u(v),

and let ft be its global solution from Global finite-energy cutoff collision evolution. Define the dimensionless one-particle functional

H(t):=∫R3ft(v)log⁡(v03ft(v)) dv.

For every t≥0, H is finite and continuously differentiable, and with A=ft(v)ft(w) and B=ft(v′)ft(w′),

H′(t)=−λ4∫R3×R3×S2(B−A)log⁡(B/A) dμ≤0.

The integrand is nonnegative. Equality holds at a time t exactly when ft is a normalized isotropic Gaussian

ft(v)=(2πs2)−3/2exp⁡ ⁣(−∣v−uˉ∣22s2)

for some uˉ∈R3 and s>0; every such Gaussian is stationary. The specified initial mixture is not a single Gaussian, so H′(0)<0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, v0>0, λ>0, u∈R3, 0<a<b, and the initial density and collision map of the Statement.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) for the completed Lebesgue measure and change-of-variables suppliers.

[F1]

Cutoff elastic-reflection collision measure and gain: the gain uses the velocities v′,w′ and parameter measure dμ=dv dw dσ(n), with v0>0 in the weighted space.

[F2]

Well-defined elastic reflection gain and collision identities: for normalized f, the weak identity applies when each of ∫∣φ∣G(f,f) dv, ∫∣φ∣f dv, ∫∣AΔφ∣ dμ, and ∫∣BΔφ∣ dμ is finite; the reflection is an involution and the parameter measure has full support.

[F3]

Regularity and invariance of the cutoff Gaussian-mixture class: the mixture class is preserved by gain and has uniform positive lower, upper, and derivative Gaussian bounds.

[F4]

Global finite-energy cutoff collision evolution: every stated mass-one finite-energy initial density has a unique global mild solution; it conserves mass, first moment and second moment, and for data in Mu,a,b it remains in that class with pointwise C1 evolution satisfying ∂tf=λ(G(f,f)−f).

[F5]

Dominated convergence: an integrable majorant permits passage of limits through the Lebesgue integral.

[F7]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative measurable functions on sigma-finite products may be integrated iteratively.

Proof

Given: [A1], v0>0, λ>0, 0<a<b, the specified f0, and [F1]–[F7].

Proof technique: direct.

1.1F3F4algebra

The bounds in [F3] give constants c,C>0 such that ce−∣v−u∣2/(2a)≤ft(v)≤Ce−∣v−u∣2/(2b) for all t,v. The same upper Gaussian envelope holds for G(ft,ft) because [F3] preserves the mixture class; [F4] therefore bounds ∣∂tft∣ by a constant times that envelope. The lower and upper bounds imply ∣log⁡(v03ft(v))∣≤C1(1+∣v−u∣2), after changing the finite constant C1. Thus ft∣log⁡(v03ft)∣ is integrable and the entropy derivative integrand has an integrable polynomial-Gaussian majorant on every compact time interval.

2.1F4F5step 1.1algebra

For each fixed v, the ordinary chain rule gives ∂t[ftlog⁡(v03ft)]=(1+log⁡(v03ft))∂tft. The uniform majorant from step 1.1 also bounds the difference quotients by the scalar mean-value theorem. Dominated convergence [F5] therefore gives H′(t)=∫(1+log⁡(v03ft))∂tft dv. The mass of ft is constant by [F4], so ∫∂tft dv=0 and the constant term drops. The integrand in the resulting formula is pointwise continuous in time by [F4] and has the same local integrable majorant from step 1.1; a second application of [F5] shows that H′(t) is continuous.

3.1A1F1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra

Fix t and write φ(v)=log⁡(v03ft(v)). The lower Gaussian bound makes φ finite. The mean of ft is still u by the moment conservation in [F4]. Also A,B are bounded above by a constant times e−(∣v−u∣2+∣w−u∣2)/(2b), because the pair reflection fixes the common mean (u,u) and preserves the sum of the two centered squared speeds. The Gaussian lower bound gives ∣log⁡(A/B)∣≤C2(1+∣v−u∣2+∣w−u∣2). The same Gaussian upper bound holds for G(ft,ft) by [F3], so ∫∣φ∣ft dv and ∫∣φ∣G(ft,ft) dv are finite; the pair bound and polynomial bound on Δφ give ∫∣AΔφ∣ dμ and ∫∣BΔφ∣ dμ finite. Thus the four conditions in [F2] hold. By [F2] and [F4], H′(t)=λ4∫(B−A)Δφ dμ. The reference factors cancel in the logarithm: Δφ=log⁡(A/B). Hence H′(t)=−λ4∫(B−A)log⁡(B/A) dμ. Since log⁡ is strictly increasing, (B−A)log⁡(B/A)≥0, proving the inequality.

4.1A1F2step 3.1algebra

If H′(t)=0, the continuous nonnegative integrand in step 3.1 vanishes μ-almost everywhere. The product measure has full support by [F2]; a continuous function nonzero at one point is bounded away from zero on a nonempty open neighborhood of positive measure. Thus A=B for every (v,w,n). Conversely, this pointwise identity makes the production integral zero.

5.1A1F2F3step 4.1algebra

Put g(v)=log⁡(v03ft(v)), a C2 function by [F3]. By the reflection coverage in [F2], for every center c∈R3 and every pair r,r′∈R3 with ∣r∣=∣r′∣, the equality in step 4.1 gives g(c+r)+g(c−r)=g(c+r′)+g(c−r′). For unit vectors θ,η, take r=sθ and r′=sη. Taylor expansion at c yields g(c+sθ)+g(c−sθ)=2g(c)+s2θTD2g(c)θ+o(s2), with the same expression for η. Dividing by s2 and taking s→0 shows that the quadratic form of D2g(c) is constant on the unit sphere. Testing ei and (ei+ej)/2 shows D2g(c)=α(c)I.

6.1step 5.1algebra

The off-diagonal Hessian entries vanish, so for each i, ∂ig depends only on its ith coordinate: changing any other coordinate leaves it fixed by the fundamental theorem of calculus along that coordinate segment. Write ∂ig(v)=Gi(vi). The equal diagonal entries give Gi′(vi)=Gj′(vj) for independently variable coordinates vi,vj; hence every such derivative is one constant α. Integrating gives g(v)=c0+β⋅v+α2∣v∣2.

7.1A1F1F2F3F4F6F7step 6.1algebra

Integrability of ft=eg/v03 forces α<0: if α>0 the density grows in every sufficiently large direction, and if α=0 an exponential of an affine function is nonintegrable on R3. Completing the square writes ft=Ce−∣v−uˉ∣2/(2s2) with s2=−1/α>0; Tonelli [F7] and the one-dimensional Gaussian integral [F6] give ∫e−∣v−uˉ∣2/(2s2)dv=(2πs2)3/2, so unit mass fixes the prefactor in the Statement. Conversely, for that Gaussian log⁡ft is a constant plus a linear function of v and a scalar multiple of ∣v∣2; pair momentum and squared-speed conservation in [F2] give A=B at every collision. Define sgn⁡(x)=1,0,−1 according as x>0,x=0,x<0, and set φ=sgn⁡(G(ft,ft)−ft). This test is bounded and measurable; since ∫A dμ=∫B dμ=1, both sides of the weak identity are absolutely integrable. Applying [F2] gives ∥G(ft,ft)−ft∥1=0. The constant curve satisfies the mild equation because e−λt+λ∫0te−λ(t−s)ds=1, and uniqueness in [F4] makes this Gaussian stationary.

8.1F3F6F7step 4.1step 7.1algebra∎

The density formula in [F3] factors for aI and bI into products of one-dimensional Gaussians; Tonelli [F7] and normalization [F6] give the first-coordinate marginal as their equal mixture. For a centered one-dimensional Gaussian of variance s2, integration of the derivative of x2k−1e−x2/(2s2) over R gives ∫x2ke−x2/(2s2)dx=(2k−1)s2∫x2k−2e−x2/(2s2)dx for k=1,2; the boundary terms vanish by Gaussian decay. Thus the mixture's centered second moment is (a+b)/2 and its fourth moment is 3(a2+b2)/2. A single Gaussian with the same second moment has fourth moment 3((a+b)/2)2, smaller by 3(a−b)2/4>0. Thus f0 is not a single Gaussian. By the equality characterization in steps 4.1–7.1, the production at t=0 is strictly positive and H′(0)<0.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources