Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler equations under weighted local-equilibrium convergence

Statement

Let T∗>0 seconds, let L1,L2,L3>0 be fixed spatial periods in metres, and set Ω=∏j=13(R/LjZ). Give Ω the completed unnormalised pushforward dx of Lebesgue measure on C=∏j[0,Lj) under the quotient map, as in the kinetic-density definition. Let v∗=1 m s−1. For k=2,3 put ωk(v):=∑j=0k(∣v∣/v∗)j. Let Qel={(v,w,v′,w′)∈R12:v+w=v′+w′, ∣v∣2+∣w∣2=∣v′∣2+∣w′∣2} be the elastic collision set, and use the nonnegative countably additive symmetric collision measure ν and operator Qν:Dν→Lloc1 specified in the earlier elastic-collision definition; the three particle-exchange and incoming/outgoing invariances are hypotheses on ν. Thus, for each fϵ(x,⋅,t) in its declared collision domain, the weak identity has factor 1/4 and collision bracket δψ=ψ(v)+ψ(w)−ψ(v′)−ψ(w′) whenever the test and both integrals are admissible. For each dimensionless ϵ>0, let fϵ>0 be periodic, C1 in (t,x) and C2 in v on the closed slab (with one-sided time derivatives at its endpoints), with ∫ω3fϵ dv<∞ at each (t,x), and solve on 0<t<T∗ ϵ(∂tfϵ+v⋅∇xfϵ)=Qν(fϵ). Assume the common L1(dv) derivative envelopes from the moment-balance proposition: for each multiplier ψ∈{m,mv1,mv2,mv3,m∣v∣2/2}, the time derivative and each spatially weighted derivative have one velocity majorant independent of (t,x) on compact time slabs. At every (t,x), require fϵ(x,⋅,t)∈Dν and 1,v1,v2,v3,∣v∣2∈Sfϵ(x,⋅,t) with the measurability and absolute-convergence conditions of the elastic-collision definition; assume finite velocity moments through degree three. The elastic bracket of each such invariant is zero. Let n,u,T be C1 on [0,T∗]×Ω, periodic in x, with n,T bounded above and bounded away from zero and u bounded; n is number density in m−3, u is velocity in m s−1, and T is temperature in kelvins. Use the fixed particle mass m>0 in kilograms and Boltzmann constant kB>0 in joules per kelvin from the kinetic-density definition, and define ρ=mn, p=nkBT, E=ρ∣u∣2/2+3nkBT/2, and Mn,u,T(v):=n(2πθ)−3/2e−∣v−u∣2/(2θ),θ:=kBT/m. Assume, as ϵ↓0, that ∫0T∗ ⁣∫Ω ⁣∫R3ω3(v)∣fϵ−Mn,u,T∣ dv dx dt⟶0, and ∫Ω ⁣∫R3ω2(v)∣fϵ(0,x,v)−Mn,u,T(0,x,v)∣ dv dx⟶0. Then ρ=mn, p=nkBT, and E=ρ∣u∣2/2+3nkBT/2 satisfy the compressible monatomic Euler equations in distributions on (0,T∗)×Ω; explicitly, for all scalar test functions ϕ,η∈C1([0,T∗]×Ω) and vector test function ζ∈C1([0,T∗]×Ω;R3) that are periodic in x and vanish near t=T∗ but may be nonzero at t=0, ∂tρ+∇x⋅(ρu)=0, ∂t(ρu)+∇x⋅(ρu⊗u+pI3)=0, ∂tE+∇x⋅((E+p)u)=0, and the corresponding weak identities with the initial traces are ∫0T∗ ⁣∫Ω(ρ ∂tϕ+ρu⋅∇xϕ) dx dt+∫Ωρ(0,x)ϕ(0,x) dx=0, ∫0T∗ ⁣∫Ω(ρu⋅∂tζ+(ρu⊗u+pI3):∇xζ) dx dt+∫Ωρ(0,x)u(0,x)⋅ζ(0,x) dx=0, ∫0T∗ ⁣∫Ω(E ∂tη+(E+p)u⋅∇xη) dx dt+∫ΩE(0,x)η(0,x) dx=0, where (A:∇xζ):=∑i,jAij∂xjζi. Their initial traces are the values of these fields at t=0. Since the limiting fields are C1, the equations hold pointwise for 0<t<T∗. This is a conditional passage theorem: it assumes the weighted convergence and asserts no such convergence or kinetic solution exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The regular scaled kinetic solutions, the displayed spacetime and initial weighted convergence, and the C1 positive limiting fields.

[F1]

Exact unclosed kinetic conservation laws: For a solution of the unscaled equation, the collision invariants give the exact mass, momentum, and energy balances with fluxes ρu, ρu⊗u+P, and Eu+Pu+q.

[F2]

Gaussian Maxwellian normalization, stress, and heat flux: The local Gaussian has density n, momentum nu, pressure tensor pI3 with p=nkBT, zero centered heat flux, and energy E=ρ∣u∣2/2+3nkBT/2.

[F3]

Nonnegative kinetic density and moment domain: The fixed velocity weight ωk is dimensionless; multiplication by it controls all velocity polynomials of degree at most k up to fixed dimensional constants.

[F4]

A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls: For concentric radii 0<r<R there is a nonnegative smooth function equal to one on the closed radius-r ball and supported in the open radius-R ball.

[F5]

If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v: For differentiable functions on a compact interval with integrable derivatives, integration by parts gives the boundary term and the integral of the product derivative; it applies along each integration coordinate when the corresponding moment derivative is continuous and the test is C1.

[A1]

Each fϵ satisfies the regularity, moment, derivative-envelope, and weak collision hypotheses of [F1], with the scaled equation in the Statement.

[A2]

The limiting fields and both convergence assumptions in the Statement hold.

Proof

1.1A1F1F5algebra

The uniform bounds on n,u,T and the Gaussian formula give sup⁡(t,x)∈[0,T∗]×Ω∫ω3(v)Mn,u,T(v) dv<∞, by the affine change v=u+θz and Gaussian decay. Since the first convergence limit is as ϵ↓0, its error integral is finite for every sufficiently small ϵ; then ω3fϵ≤ω3∣fϵ−Mn,u,T∣+ω3Mn,u,T gives the local weighted L1 hypothesis required by [F1]. Multiply the scaled kinetic equation in [A1] by m, mvi, and m∣v∣2/2 and integrate over velocity. Each collision bracket is zero, so division by ϵ>0 gives the same mass, momentum, and energy balances as [F1] for these ϵ. The derivative envelopes permit passing each time derivative of a moment density and each corresponding coordinate derivative of a flux component through the velocity integral. Pointwise continuity of the integrands and the common envelopes make those derivatives continuous by dominated convergence; the local weighted L1 bound makes the moment densities and fluxes locally integrable. Thus [F5] applies coordinatewise to the balances and the C1 periodic tests: opposite spatial faces cancel and the tests vanish near T∗. The initial ω2 convergence makes the initial moment terms finite, and the time-derivative envelopes give their traces at t=0 as the velocity integrals of fϵ(0). This yields the three weak identities on [0,T∗] for every sufficiently small ϵ.

2.1A1A2F1F3step 1.1algebra

Let ϕ,η, and ζ be any scalar and vector test functions allowed in the Statement. The coefficients in the weak moment identities are velocity polynomials of degree at most three; the initial terms have degree at most two. By [F3] and [A2], the absolute difference between an fϵ moment or flux and the corresponding Gaussian moment is bounded by a constant (depending on the test and fixed physical coefficients) times the displayed ω3 spacetime error. The initial-moment difference is bounded by the analogous ω2 error. Both bounds tend to zero.

3.1A2F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

By [F2], the limiting Gaussian moment fluxes are ρu, ρu⊗u+pI3, and (E+p)u. Pass to the limit in each weak identity from step 1.1 using step 2.1. This gives the three Euler equations in distributions and the stated initial traces.

4.1A2F4step 3.1algebra∎

Each residual component is continuous because n,u,T are C1. If one residual were nonzero at a point, continuity would give a coordinate ball whose closure lies in (0,T∗) times a flat torus chart and on which that component has a constant strict sign. Choose concentric coordinate balls with radii 0<r<R inside this neighborhood. By [F4] there is a smooth nonnegative bump equal to one on the inner ball and supported in the outer ball; extend it by zero from the chart to the periodic domain. Its pairing with the residual has strict sign, contradicting the distributional equation from step 3.1. Therefore every residual component vanishes pointwise.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources