How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Free Gaussian dispersive kernel
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let on with (Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms), let be the Plancherel transform with on (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem), so that , and let . Define, for and a.e. , where is the principal branch (Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers). Then:
(a) and ; consequently extends uniquely to a unitary operator on , and in the sense of the functional calculus of the free operator.
(b) For every the representative is everywhere defined and bounded with
(c) For every one has and .
No physical interpretation and no point-particle trajectory is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the free operator , the time , , and the branch normalization of the display.
For , the weak second derivative satisfies almost everywhere, by Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers with the multi-index having in coordinate and elsewhere. Since , linearity gives , . The Sobolev identification in Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms (including the weighted-domain converse proved in its steps 1.3 and 4.1) gives if and only if . Because , this is equivalent to . Thus, with on , Plancherel unitarity yields with equality of domains (Plancherel theorem). The real multiplier is self-adjoint directly: bounded-support truncations give density, and testing an adjoint identity against all functions supported in identifies the adjoint vector with times the input; exhaustion gives exactly the same domain. Its free PVM is indicator multiplication , with countable additivity by dominated convergence. Thus bounded Borel gives the scalar multiplier with norm at most , and . The Statement's operator-domain citation only identifies this independently established Fourier domain; no generic AC-bearing composite calculus is used.
Complex Gaussian integral: for and , with the principal branch, and is holomorphic on the right half-plane (Complex Gaussian continuation).
Euclidean Gaussian Fourier transform: for , by Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization. For fixed , both sides are holomorphic in on : on a compact subset with , differentiating the integral is dominated by , integrable by the same Gaussian supplier, and the principal-power expression is holomorphic by the branch convention in Complex Gaussian continuation. Agreement for positive therefore extends throughout the right half-plane by Identity theorem for holomorphic functions. This continuation is a local deduction, not an extra assertion of the real Gaussian interface. Absolutely integrable Fourier exchanges use Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, and integration of nonnegative squared-error sums uses Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product.
Dominated convergence and the fact that Schwartz functions are dense in , with unitary (Dominated convergence, Schwartz space is dense in L2, Plancherel theorem, Schwartz space and its seminorms).
Proof
[Damped kernel] Fix , put , and consider the multiplier , i.e. the operator . By [F3] with , applied fiberwise in the three coordinates through the product structure and [F2], its integral kernel is , where the power is the principal branch of [F2]; hence for Schwartz one has .
[Removing the damping] Let be Schwartz and . As one has , by continuity of the principal branch on the closed right half-plane away from , and pointwise in ; the uniform domination holds for all and because and the exponential factor has modulus at most . Since , dominated convergence [F4] gives for every , and for all .
[Identification with free evolution] For Schwartz , Plancherel gives , because ; the damped operator is a contraction, not an isometry. Moreover in by dominated convergence with squared majorant . Hence in . For integers , define recursively and let be the least integer with and . The convergence just proved makes the eligible integer set nonempty. Thus and the squared errors are summable; this prescribed integer selection needs no choice principle. Integrating the sum of these squared errors makes that sum finite almost everywhere, so the selected sequence converges almost everywhere to . Its pointwise limit from step 2.1 is everywhere; therefore almost everywhere and . The scalar unit-modulus free multiplier is unitary and preserves the dense Schwartz class, so this kernel operator on that class has the unique unitary extension .
[The full intersection class and domain preservation] For , choose Schwartz jointly in and : first truncate the input in support and value, then convolve each bounded compactly supported truncation with a smooth compact approximate identity and choose a small enough radius for both norm errors. Translation continuity in each , , follows first for finite box-step functions by the volume of symmetric differences and then by their elementary density; thus the convolution errors tend to zero in both norms. Each approximant is compactly supported smooth and hence Schwartz; at most countable choices are used. The uniform kernel bound gives , while the unitary extension of step 3.1 converges in to . The squared-error subsequence argument of step 3.1 identifies these two limits almost everywhere, proving (a) on the full class. The absolutely convergent integral is everywhere defined and directly bounded by , proving (b). Finally multiplication by preserves exactly the domain and its weighted norm, so and . This proves (c) and all assertions.
Depends on
Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers
Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms
Complex Gaussian continuation
Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization
Plancherel theorem
Fourier transform on complex L1 classes
Dominated convergence
Schwartz space is dense in L2
Schwartz space and its seminorms
Hilbert space
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers
Identity theorem for holomorphic functions
Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- G. Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 1st edition 2009, Section 7.2 pp. 167-171 (the free Schrodinger operator, its propagator kernel and the resolvent)
- R. Fitzpatrick, Quantum Mechanics (University of Texas at Austin, author-hosted course text), Evolution of Wave Packets pp. 29-32 (the spreading Gaussian free packet)