Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Free Gaussian dispersive kernel

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let H0=−Δ on L2(R3;C) with D(H0)=W2,2(R3;C) (Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms), let F2 be the Plancherel transform with f^(ξ)=∫f(x)e−2πix⋅ξdx on L1 (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem), so that H0=F2∗M4π2∣ξ∣2F2, and let t∈R∖{0}. Define, for ψ∈L1∩L2(R3) and a.e. x, (Ktψ)(x):=(4πit)−3/2∫R3ei∣x−y∣2/(4t)ψ(y) dy, where (4πit)−3/2:=exp⁡(−32Log⁡(4πit)) is the principal branch (Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers). Then:

(a) Ktψ∈L2 and ∥Ktψ∥2=∥ψ∥2; consequently Kt extends uniquely to a unitary operator U^t on L2, and U^t=e−itH0 in the sense of the functional calculus of the free operator.

(b) For every ψ∈L1∩L2 the representative Ktψ is everywhere defined and bounded with ∥Ktψ∥∞≤(4π∣t∣)−3/2∥ψ∥1.

(c) For every ψ∈D(H0) one has e−itH0ψ∈D(H0) and ∥H0e−itH0ψ∥2=∥H0ψ∥2.

No physical interpretation and no point-particle trajectory is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the free operator H0=−Δ, the time t∈R∖{0}, ψ∈L1∩L2, and the branch normalization of the display.

[F1]

For u∈W2,2(R3;C), the weak second derivative ∂j2u∈L2 satisfies F2(∂j2u)=(2πiξj)2F2u=−4π2ξj2F2u almost everywhere, by Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers with the multi-index having 2 in coordinate j and 0 elsewhere. Since −Δu=−∑j=13∂j2u, linearity gives F2(H0u)=qF2u, q(ξ)=4π2∣ξ∣2. The Sobolev identification in Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms (including the weighted-domain converse proved in its steps 1.3 and 4.1) gives u∈W2,2 if and only if (1+∣ξ∣2)F2u∈L2. Because F2u∈L2, this is equivalent to qF2u∈L2. Thus, with Mqh:=qh on D(Mq):={h∈L2:qh∈L2}, Plancherel unitarity yields H0=F2∗MqF2 with equality of domains (Plancherel theorem). The real multiplier is self-adjoint directly: bounded-support truncations give density, and testing an adjoint identity against all functions supported in {q≤n} identifies the adjoint vector with q times the input; exhaustion gives exactly the same domain. Its free PVM is indicator multiplication E(B)=F2∗M1q∈BF2, with countable additivity by dominated convergence. Thus bounded Borel g gives the scalar multiplier g(q) with norm at most sup⁡E≥0∣g(E)∣, and e−itH0=F2∗Me−itqF2. The Statement's operator-domain citation only identifies this independently established Fourier domain; no generic AC-bearing composite calculus is used.

[F2]

Complex Gaussian integral: for Re⁡z>0 and d≥1, ∫Rde−z∣x∣2dx=(π/z)d/2 with the principal branch, and z↦(π/z)d/2 is holomorphic on the right half-plane (Complex Gaussian continuation).

[F3]

Euclidean Gaussian Fourier transform: ∫Rde−a∣ξ∣2e2πix⋅ξdξ=(a/π)−d/2e−π2∣x∣2/a for a>0, by Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization. For fixed x, both sides are holomorphic in a on Re⁡a>0: on a compact subset with Re⁡a≥δ>0, differentiating the integral is dominated by ∣ξ∣2e−δ∣ξ∣2/2, integrable by the same Gaussian supplier, and the principal-power expression is holomorphic by the branch convention in Complex Gaussian continuation. Agreement for positive a therefore extends throughout the right half-plane by Identity theorem for holomorphic functions. This continuation is a local deduction, not an extra assertion of the real Gaussian interface. Absolutely integrable Fourier exchanges use Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, and integration of nonnegative squared-error sums uses Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product.

[F4]

Dominated convergence and the fact that Schwartz functions are dense in L2, with F2 unitary (Dominated convergence, Schwartz space is dense in L2, Plancherel theorem, Schwartz space and its seminorms).

Proof

1.1F2F3F4algebra

[Damped kernel] Fix ε>0, put zε=ε+it, and consider the multiplier gε(ξ):=e−4π2zε∣ξ∣2, i.e. the operator Tε:=F2∗MgεF2. By [F3] with a=4π2zε, applied fiberwise in the three coordinates through the product structure and [F2], its integral kernel is (4πzε)−3/2e−∣x−y∣2/(4zε), where the power is the principal branch of [F2]; hence for Schwartz ψ one has (Tεψ)(x)=(4πzε)−3/2∫e−∣x−y∣2/(4zε)ψ(y)dy.

2.1step 1.1F2F4algebra

[Removing the damping] Let ψ be Schwartz and x∈R3. As ε↓0 one has zε→it, (4πzε)−3/2→(4πit)−3/2 by continuity of the principal branch on the closed right half-plane away from 0, and e−∣x−y∣2/(4zε)→e−∣x−y∣2/(4it) pointwise in y; the uniform domination ∣(4πzε)−3/2e−∣x−y∣2/(4zε)∣≤(4π∣zε∣)−3/2≤(4π∣t∣)−3/2 holds for all y and 0<ε<1 because ∣zε∣≥∣t∣ and the exponential factor has modulus at most 1. Since ψ∈L1, dominated convergence [F4] gives (Tεψ)(x)→(Ktψ)(x) for every x, and ∣(Tεψ)(x)∣≤(4π∣t∣)−3/2∥ψ∥1 for all x,ε.

3.1step 2.1F1F4algebra

[Identification with free evolution] For Schwartz ψ, Plancherel gives ∥Tεψ∥2≤∥ψ∥2, because ∣gε∣≤1; the damped operator is a contraction, not an isometry. Moreover gεF2ψ→e−itqF2ψ in L2 by dominated convergence with squared majorant 4∣F2ψ∣2. Hence Tεψ→e−itH0ψ in L2. For integers n≥1, define recursively m0=1 and let mn be the least integer m>mn−1 with m≥n and ∥T1/mψ−e−itH0ψ∥22<2−n. The L2 convergence just proved makes the eligible integer set nonempty. Thus εn:=1/mn↓0 and the squared errors are summable; this prescribed integer selection needs no choice principle. Integrating the sum of these squared errors makes that sum finite almost everywhere, so the selected sequence converges almost everywhere to e−itH0ψ. Its pointwise limit from step 2.1 is Ktψ everywhere; therefore Ktψ=e−itH0ψ almost everywhere and ∥Ktψ∥2=∥ψ∥2. The scalar unit-modulus free multiplier is unitary and preserves the dense Schwartz class, so this kernel operator on that class has the unique unitary extension e−itH0.

4.1step 3.1F1F4algebra∎

[The full intersection class and domain preservation] For ψ∈L1∩L2, choose Schwartz ψn→ψ jointly in L1 and L2: first truncate the input in support and value, then convolve each bounded compactly supported truncation with a smooth compact approximate identity and choose a small enough radius for both norm errors. Translation continuity in each Lp, p=1,2, follows first for finite box-step functions by the volume of symmetric differences and then by their elementary density; thus the convolution errors tend to zero in both norms. Each approximant is compactly supported smooth and hence Schwartz; at most countable choices are used. The uniform kernel bound gives ∥Ktψn−Ktψ∥∞≤(4π∣t∣)−3/2∥ψn−ψ∥1→0, while the unitary extension of step 3.1 converges in L2 to e−itH0ψ. The squared-error subsequence argument of step 3.1 identifies these two limits almost everywhere, proving (a) on the full L1∩L2 class. The absolutely convergent integral is everywhere defined and directly bounded by (4π∣t∣)−3/2∥ψ∥1, proving (b). Finally multiplication by e−itq preserves exactly the domain qF2ψ∈L2 and its weighted norm, so H0e−itH0ψ=e−itH0H0ψ and ∥H0e−itH0ψ∥2=∥H0ψ∥2. This proves (c) and all assertions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources