Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded perturbations of the interval Dirichlet Laplacian

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let 0<L<∞, let AD be the Dirichlet Laplacian of Identification of the Dirichlet Laplacian with the sine diagonal operator with D(AD)={u∈H2(0,L):u∗(0)=u∗(L)=0} and ADu=−D2u, and let V∈C([0,L];R) with ∥V∥∞=max⁡[0,L]∣V∣. Let A:=AD+MV with domain D(A):=D(AD), where (MVu)=Vu is multiplication by V. Then:

(a) MV is bounded self-adjoint with ∥MV∥=∥V∥∞, A is self-adjoint on D(AD), and Au=−D2u+Vu for u∈D(AD);

(b) A has compact resolvent: (A−z)−1 is compact for every z∈ρ(A); consequently A has a complete orthonormal family of eigenvectors, all eigenspaces are finite dimensional, the eigenvalues E1≤E2≤⋯ (listed with multiplicity) satisfy En→∞ and σess(A)=∅;

(c) with λn=(nπ/L)2 and En(AD)=λn, the min-max eigenvalues satisfy ∣En−λn∣≤∥V∥∞(n≥1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: L>0; real continuous V; the Dirichlet Laplacian AD of Identification of the Dirichlet Laplacian with the sine diagonal operator with spectrum {λn:n≥1}, λn=(nπ/L)2, eigenbasis (en), and the form identity ⟨ADu,u⟩=∥Du∥L22 for u∈D(AD).

[F1]

Multiplication by the bounded measurable function V is a bounded self-adjoint operator on L2(0,L) with norm ∥V∥∞, and V is AD-bounded with relative bound 0: ∥MVu∥=∥Vu∥≤∥V∥∞∥u∥, so D(AD)⊆D(MV)=L2 (Relative boundedness with respect to an operator).

[F2]

Kato-Rellich (Kato-Rellich theorem): if AD is self-adjoint and B is symmetric with D(AD)⊆D(B) and AD-bound less than one, then AD+B with domain D(AD) is self-adjoint.

[F3]

Finite-rank operators are compact, and a norm limit of compact operators is compact (Bounded finite rank operators are compact, Norm limit of compact operators is compact, Compact linear operator).

[F4]

Compact-resolvent structure (Self-adjoint operators with compact resolvent: eigenbasis and discrete spectrum): if a self-adjoint A on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space has c∈ρ(A) with (A−c)−1 compact, then A has a complete orthonormal family (ψn)n≥1 of eigenvectors with eigenvalues En satisfying ∣En∣→∞, all eigenspaces are finite dimensional, σ(A) is exactly the eigenvalue set, σess(A)=∅, and every resolvent is compact.

[F5]

Min-max principle below the essential spectrum (Min-max principle below the essential spectrum, Spectral form domain and core of a semibounded operator): for a self-adjoint operator bounded below with Λ=inf⁡σess=+∞, the eigenvalues E1≤E2≤⋯, listed with multiplicity, satisfy En=inf⁡L′⊆Q(A),dim⁡L′=nsup⁡x∈L′,∥x∥=1qA[x]=inf⁡L′⊆D(A),dim⁡L′=nsup⁡x∈L′,∥x∥=1⟨Ax,x⟩, and qA[x]=⟨Ax,x⟩ for x∈D(A).

Proof

1.1F1F2given

[Self-adjointness] By [F1], MV is bounded self-adjoint with norm ∥V∥∞ and is AD-bounded with relative bound 0 (take a=0, b=∥V∥∞ in Relative boundedness with respect to an operator). Since AD is self-adjoint on D(AD), [F2] makes A=AD+MV self-adjoint on D(AD); and Au=ADu+Vu=−D2u+Vu by Identification of the Dirichlet Laplacian with the sine diagonal operator.

1.2givenF3algebra

[The free resolvent is a norm limit of finite-rank operators] Let c<λ1 be real and let RD:=(AD−c)−1, the diagonal operator with respect to the orthonormal basis (en) of Identification of the Dirichlet Laplacian with the sine diagonal operator: RDen=(λn−c)−1en, from ADen=λnen. For N≥1 let RD(N) be the diagonal operator with the same eigenvectors but coefficients (λn−c)−1 for n≤N and 0 for n>N; it is finite rank. For x=∑ncnen∈L2 one has (RD−RD(N))x=∑n>N(λn−c)−1cnen, so ∥(RD−RD(N))x∥≤(sup⁡n>N(λn−c)−1)∥x∥, and the norm identity ∥RD−RD(N)∥=sup⁡n>N(λn−c)−1 follows by testing on unit eigenvectors; this supremum tends to 0 because λn=(nπ/L)2→∞. Hence RD is a norm limit of finite-rank operators, and by [F3] it is compact.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2givenalgebra

[Compactness of the perturbed resolvent] Choose c:=λ1−∥V∥∞−1<λ1, so that d:=dist⁡(c,σ(AD))=λ1−c=∥V∥∞+1 and ∥RDMV∥≤∥RD∥ ∥V∥∞≤∥V∥∞/(∥V∥∞+1)<1. Then I+RDMV is boundedly invertible by the Neumann series, and on D(AD) (A−c)=(AD−c)(I+RDMV), because RD(AD−c)=I on D(AD). Hence (A−c)−1=(I+RDMV)−1RD, a product of a bounded operator with the compact operator RD, hence compact (Compositions with a compact operator are compact); the inverse exists because A is self-adjoint and c<λ1−∥V∥∞≤inf⁡σ(A): indeed ⟨Au,u⟩=⟨ADu,u⟩+⟨Vu,u⟩≥λ1∥u∥2−∥V∥∞∥u∥2, so A≥(λ1−∥V∥∞)I and c∈ρ(A).

3.1step 2.1F4

[Eigenbasis and discreteness] The space L2(0,L;C) is infinite dimensional: the vectors en, n≥1, of Identification of the Dirichlet Laplacian with the sine diagonal operator form an infinite orthonormal family (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases), while a space with a finite spanning set has no linearly independent subset equinumerous with N, and a finite-dimensional space has a finite basis, hence a finite spanning set (If V has a spanning set with n elements, then every linearly independent subset of V is finite with at most n elements; in particular V has no linearly independent subset equinumerous with N, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dim⁡FV; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis). Step 2.1 supplies c∈ρ(A) with compact resolvent, so [F4] gives a complete orthonormal eigenfamily (ψn)n≥1 of eigenvectors with eigenvalues En satisfying ∣En∣→∞, finite dimensional eigenspaces, σ(A) equal to the eigenvalue set and σess(A)=∅; since A≥(λ1−∥V∥∞)I the eigenvalues are bounded below, so En→+∞ along any enumeration, and the eigenvalues may be listed with multiplicity in increasing order. This is (b).

4.1step 3.1F5givenalgebra∎

[Min-max comparison] Both A and AD are bounded below and have empty essential spectrum by step 3.1 (for AD: σ(AD)={λn}, all isolated eigenvalues of finite multiplicity by Identification of the Dirichlet Laplacian with the sine diagonal operator and the definition of the discrete spectrum, so σess(AD)=∅). By [F5], for n≥1, En=inf⁡L′⊆D(A),dim⁡L′=nsup⁡x∈L′∥x∥=1⟨Ax,x⟩,λn=inf⁡L′⊆D(AD),dim⁡L′=nsup⁡x∈L′∥x∥=1⟨ADx,x⟩. Since D(A)=D(AD), and ∣⟨MVx,x⟩∣≤∥V∥∞∥x∥2, every trial space gives ⟨ADx,x⟩−∥V∥∞≤⟨Ax,x⟩≤⟨ADx,x⟩+∥V∥∞ for ∥x∥=1; taking suprema over then infima over the same family of n-dimensional trial spaces yields λn−∥V∥∞≤En≤λn+∥V∥∞, which is (c).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources