Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The one-dimensional delta interface operator

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Fix α∈R. Let D(Aα) be the set of classes u∈H1(R) whose restrictions to (0,∞) and (−∞,0) have representatives of class H2 on each half-line (One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals) and which satisfy the interface condition u′∗(0+)−u′∗(0−)=α u∗(0), where u∗ is the continuous representative of Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative and u′∗(0±) are the one-sided traces of the representative of the weak derivative, which exist by Endpoint trace bound and decay of H1 functions. For u∈D(Aα) define Aαu to be the class equal to −D2u on each half-line. Then:

(a) D(Aα) is a dense linear subspace of L2(R;C) and Aα:D(Aα)→L2(R) is a well-defined linear operator;

(b) Aα is symmetric;

(c) Aα is self-adjoint; explicitly, for z∈C∖R the operator Aα−z is a bijection D(Aα)→L2(R).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: α∈R; the domain D(Aα) and operator Aα of the statement.

[F1]

Traces: every H1 class on an interval has a unique continuous absolutely continuous representative, with ∣u∗(x)−u∗(y)∣≤∣x−y∣∥u′∥L2 and the endpoint bound ∣u∗(x)∣≤δ−1/2∥u∥L2(c,d)+δ1/2∥u′∥L2(c,d) on each interval (c,d)∋x of length δ (Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative, Endpoint trace bound and decay of H1 functions).

[F2]

Integration by parts on half-lines: for u,v∈H1(0,∞), ∫0∞uv′‾=−u∗(0+)v∗(0+)‾−∫0∞u′v‾; on (−∞,0) the origin contribution instead is +u∗(0−)v∗(0−)‾; the boundary products at ±∞ vanish by the decay of H1 representatives (Integration by parts and the endpoint-vanishing space on intervals clause (d), Endpoint trace bound and decay of H1 functions).

[F3]

The free line operator: for z∉[0,∞) and k with k2=−z, Re⁡k>0, the kernel Gz(t)=(2k)−1e−k∣t∣ defines a bounded operator R0(z)f=Gz∗f on L2(R) with range H2(R), R0(z)(A0−z)=IH2 and (A0−z)R0(z)=IL2, where A0u=−D2u on H2(R); also Gz′(0+)−Gz′(0−)=−1 and r(0)=∫RGz(y)f(y)dy for r=R0(z)f (The free-line resolvent kernel and its inverse operator, Real multiplication operators and free plus bounded-potential Schrödinger operators).

[F4]

Smooth compactly supported functions are dense in L2(R) (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n) with k=0, p=2); the range criterion for a densely defined symmetric operator T: T is self-adjoint iff ran⁡(T−z)=H for every z∈C∖R (Range criterion for self-adjointness, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

Proof

1.1F1F4algebra

[Density] Let φ∈Cc∞(R∖{0}). Then φ∗=φ vanishes near 0, so φ′∗(0+)−φ′∗(0−)=0=αφ∗(0) and both half-line restrictions are smooth with compact support: φ∈D(Aα). Now let f∈L2(R) and ε>0. By [F4] there is ψ∈Cc∞(R) with ∥f−ψ∥<ε. Choose a function χ∈C∞(R) with χ=0 near 0 and χ=1 outside [−1,1], and put χδ(x):=χ(x/δ). Then χδψ∈Cc∞(R∖{0}) and ∥χδψ−ψ∥L2→0 as δ→0 by dominated convergence, since ∣χδψ−ψ∣≤2∣ψ∣∈L1∩L2 and the left side tends to 0 pointwise. For small δ, ∥χδψ−ψ∥<ε, so D(Aα) contains a dense subspace.

1.2F1given

[Well-definedness] Let u∈D(Aα). By definition the restrictions u± lie in H2 on the two half-lines, so their second weak derivatives D2u± are L2 classes on those half-lines; the class Aαu obtained by gluing −D2u+ and −D2u− is in L2(R) and depends only on the class u. The assignment is linear because weak differentiation and restriction are linear.

1.3F1F2givenalgebra

[Symmetry] Let u,v∈D(Aα). Splitting the integrals and integrating by parts twice on each half-line, using [F2] and the vanishing of the boundary products at ±∞, ⟨Aαu,v⟩=(u′∗(0+)−u′∗(0−))v∗(0)‾+∫R(Du)Dv‾=αu∗(0)v∗(0)‾+∫R(Du)Dv‾. (On each half-line the two integrations by parts produce the boundary contribution of the derivative jump, and the intermediate terms ∫DuDv‾ combine.) Hence ⟨Aαu,v⟩−⟨u,Aαv⟩=αu∗(0)v∗(0)‾−αv∗(0)u∗(0)‾‾=0, so Aα is symmetric.

2.1step 1.2F1F3givenalgebra

[Range at nonreal z] Fix z∈C∖R, f∈L2(R), and put r:=R0(z)f∈H2(R), so that (A0−z)r=f by [F3]. Let k with k2=−z, Re⁡k>0, and put u:=r+c Gz,c:=−α r(0)1+αGz(0)=−α r(0)1+α/(2k). The denominator does not vanish: if 1+α/(2k)=0, then 2k=−α∈R, contradicting Im⁡k≠0 (which holds because k2=−z is nonreal). Since r,Gz∈H1(R) (steps (a) of The free-line resolvent kernel and its inverse operator), u∈H1(R); on each half-line u is a linear combination of H2 functions, hence satisfies the half-line regularity in the definition of D(Aα). The trace of Du at 0 jumps only through Gz: r∈H2(R) has a continuous derivative representative at 0, while Gz′(0+)−Gz′(0−)=−1 by [F3]. Therefore u′∗(0+)−u′∗(0−)=−c=α(r(0)+c2k)=αu∗(0), where the middle equality uses the definition of c and Gz(0)=(2k)−1. So u∈D(Aα), and away from 0 (Aα−z)u=−D2(r+cGz)−z(r+cGz)=(f+zr)−zr+0=f, since −D2r−zr=f on R and −D2Gz−zGz=0 on each half-line (direct computation from Gz′′=k2Gz and k2=−z). Hence ran⁡(Aα−z)=L2(R) for every nonreal z.

3.1step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1F4∎

[Self-adjointness] Steps 1.1 and 1.3 give a densely defined symmetric operator, and step 2.1 gives ran⁡(Aα−z)=L2(R) for z=±i; the range criterion [F4] makes Aα self-adjoint.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources