Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A symmetric half-line momentum with no self-adjoint extension

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice, Countable Choice, and Dependent Choice. On H=L2(0,∞;C) let Scf=−iDf with domain D(Sc)=Cc∞(0,∞). Its closure S‾c has deficiency indices (n+,n−)=(1,0) at reference scale E∗=1, and therefore has no self-adjoint extension on H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The half-line Hilbert space and operator in the Statement.

[A1]

Countable Choice, the Axiom of Choice, and Dependent Choice are the hypotheses of the interval Sobolev and integration-by-parts suppliers. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The Axiom of Choice The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain

[F1]

H1(0,∞) consists of the L2 classes with weak derivative in L2. On each bounded subinterval the class has the unique absolutely continuous representative of One-dimensional Sobolev spaces on intervals and Absolutely continuous representative of an L2 function with L2 weak derivative. Uniqueness makes these representatives agree on overlaps, defining one locally absolutely continuous representative on (0,∞). The half-line integration-by-parts identity is clause (d) of Integration by parts and the endpoint-vanishing space on intervals.

[F2]

The adjoint is characterized by ⟨Scf,g⟩=⟨f,Sc∗g⟩ on the dense domain Cc∞(0,∞); a densely defined symmetric operator is closable and the adjoint of its closure equals its adjoint (Adjoint of a densely defined operator, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators, Closability is equivalent to density of the adjoint domain). The weak derivative convention is the test-function identity of Weak derivative of a locally integrable function.

[F3]

Absolute continuity on a compact real interval means that small total length of a finite family of pairwise interior-disjoint subintervals forces small total endpoint increment; complex-valued absolute continuity is componentwise (Absolute continuity on a compact interval, One-dimensional W1,p functions have unique absolutely continuous representatives). For real x, the complex exponential equals the real exponential, and the complex entire theorem gives its derivative as itself (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential). The real derivative theorem and real chain rule give (ex)′=ex and (e−x)′=−e−x (The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡, The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if g is differentiable at c and f is differentiable at g(c), then f∘g is differentiable at c with (f∘g)′(c)=f′(g(c)) g′(c)). The H1 representative's classical derivative equals its weak derivative a.e., and its increments are the integrals of that derivative, by the representative result cited above. On each compact interval, the real exponential is C1 with bounded derivative, hence Lipschitz and absolutely continuous by C1 implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation. The exponential times the representative is then absolutely continuous by The product of two absolutely continuous functions is absolutely continuous applied to real and imaginary parts. At every point where the representative is differentiable, the real product rule from Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0 gives the derivative of that product; hence the formula holds almost everywhere. For a real absolutely continuous function, zero derivative almost everywhere implies constancy by the fundamental theorem of calculus (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions); apply this to the real and imaginary parts for complex-valued products.

[F4]

For a closed densely defined symmetric operator, a self-adjoint extension exists exactly when its two deficiency indices agree (Closed symmetric operators and deficiency data, Unitary deficiency parameterization at a reference scale).

[F5]

Cc∞(0,∞) is dense in L2(0,∞) by the smooth-test density theorem on open subsets of R (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2).

Proof

Given: The hypotheses of the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F5

By [F5], the test functions are dense in L2(0,∞). For f,g∈Cc∞(0,∞), integration by parts [F1] gives ⟨Scf,g⟩=⟨f,Scg⟩ with no endpoint terms. Thus Sc is symmetric, so it is closable by [F2], and S‾c ∗=Sc∗.

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1

If g∈H1(0,∞), [F1] gives ⟨Scf,g⟩=⟨f,−iDg⟩ for every test f, so g∈D(Sc∗) and Sc∗g=−iDg. Conversely, if g∈D(Sc∗) and h=Sc∗g, testing the adjoint identity against every f∈Cc∞(0,∞) says distributionally Dg=ih∈L2. Together with g∈L2 this is exactly g∈H1. Hence D(Sc∗)=H1(0,∞) and Sc∗=−iD.

3.1A1F1F3step 2.1algebra

By step 2.1, g∈N+(S‾c;1) exactly when g∈H1 and −iDg=ig, that is, Dg=−g. Its absolutely continuous representative satisfies (exg(x))′=ex(g(x)+g′(x))=0 almost everywhere by the product rule in [F3] and g′=−g. On each bounded subinterval the absolutely continuous fundamental theorem in [F3] makes exg(x) constant; overlap consistency makes it one constant c on the whole half-line. Thus g(x)=ce−x. Since ∫0∞e−2x dx=1/2, this is in L2 for every c, and its classical derivative −ce−x is also in L2 and is its weak derivative by [F1]. Thus every such function is in H1 and satisfies the kernel equation, so N+={ce−x:c∈C} is one-dimensional.

4.1A1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

A vector g∈N−(S‾c;1) satisfies Dg=g by step 2.1, so (e−xg(x))′=e−x(g′(x)−g(x))=0 almost everywhere by [F3] and g′=g. On each bounded subinterval the absolutely continuous fundamental theorem in [F3] makes e−xg(x) constant; overlap consistency gives one c∈C on the whole half-line, so g(x)=cex. If c≠0, ∫0R∣cex∣2dx=∣c∣2(e2R−1)/2→∞, contradicting g∈L2(0,∞). Hence c=0, N−={0} and n−=0. Combining step 3.1's positive-deficiency calculation with this result and the common adjoint from step 1.1 gives the closure's indices (1,0).

5.1A1F4step 3.1step 4.1∎

The indices are unequal, so [F4] implies that S‾c has no self-adjoint extension on H. This proves the Statement.

Remarks

Teschl's Problem 2.27 uses A0=+iD on the same test-function domain, whereas Sc=−A0. For the convention here, N+(A;1)=ker⁡(A∗−iI) and N−(A;1)=ker⁡(A∗+iI). The adjoint definition gives Sc∗=−A0∗, so N+(Sc;1)=N−(A0;1) and N−(Sc;1)=N+(A0;1). Thus negating the operator swaps the two deficiency indices. The local kernel calculations in steps 3.1 and 4.1 establish (1,0) for −iD directly; the exercise is a locator for the related +iD problem, not a substitute for this sign check.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources