Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Free-cube grand-pressure limit for decreasing integrable tails

Statement

Let ϕ be stable and regular as in Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation, with stability constant B, and fix a,β>0. For free-boundary cubes define ΞL(a,β)=∑N≥0aNZ(L,N;β). Then 1≤ΞL(a,β)≤exp⁡(aeβBLd),p(a,β):=lim⁡L→∞L−dlog⁡ΞL(a,β) exists and is finite. This theorem assumes only stability and the decreasing integrable two-sided tail in regularity; it does not assert canonical fixed-density convergence, periodic-boundary equality, or arbitrary-region limits.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Dimension d≥1, a stable regular pair potential, its stability constant B, and fixed numerical length and energy units.

[A1]

Stability means Hϕ(ω)≥−BN(ω) for every finite configuration, and the grand partition uses the 1/N! normalization in Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation.

[F1]

Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation: for some nonnegative nonincreasing ψ and R0<∞, ∣ϕ(x)∣≤ψ(∣x∣∞) for ∣x∣∞≥R0, with finite weighted integral ∫R0∞ψ(r)rd−1dr.

[F2]

Diagonal gap for a decreasing integrable interaction tail: ∑m≥1md−1ψ(mg)≤2d−1g−dη(g) and there are gaps g(ℓ) with g(ℓ)/ℓ→0 and (ℓ/g(ℓ))dη(g(ℓ))→0.

[F5]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative sums and product integrals factor over finitely many disjoint regions.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and suppliers in Facts & Assumptions.

1.1A1F3F4algebra

Put q=aeβB. For every N-point configuration, 0≤e−βHϕ≤eβBN by [A1]. Applying [F3] to the finite-volume integral gives aNZ(L,N;β)≤(qLd)N/N!. Summing by [F4] yields ΞL≤eqLd; the empty configuration contributes exactly 1, so ΞL≥1.

2.1A1F3F4step 1.1algebra

Choose K>eq+1 and an integer cutoff nℓ with Kℓd<nℓ≤Kℓd+1. For N>nℓ, 1≤eN−Kℓd, so ∑N>nℓaNZ(ℓ,N;β)≤e−Kℓd∑N≥0(eqℓd)NN!=e(eq−K)ℓd≤e−ℓd. Because Ξℓ≥1, the truncated sum Ξℓcut=∑N=0nℓaNZ(ℓ,N;β) satisfies Ξℓcut≥(1−e−ℓd)Ξℓ.

3.1F1F3F5step 2.1construct

Fix a core side ℓ and a gap g>2R0. Place M=⌊L/(ℓ+g)⌋d disjoint core cubes of side ℓ in [0,L)d on the lattice of spacing ℓ+g. Restrict every core to at most nℓ particles. If two core indices differ by maximum norm m≥1, every pair between them has separation at least mg in maximum norm. The number of offsets in shell m is (2m+1)d−(2m−1)d≤cdmd−1. By [F1], the sum of positive cross-core pair energies is therefore at most DL,ℓ,g≤cdMnℓ2∑m≥1md−1ψ(mg). Negative cross-core energies only increase the Boltzmann weight. Splitting the grand sum by the particle counts in these disjoint cores, Tonelli [F5] and the multinomial coefficient show that the global N! cancels the assignments of labeled coordinates to cores. Thus ΞL≥e−βDL,ℓ,g(Ξℓcut)M.

4.1F2step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Divide the last inequality by Ld and let L→∞ with ℓ,g fixed. Since M/Ld→(ℓ+g)−d, [F2] gives lim inf⁡L→∞L−dlog⁡ΞL≥(ℓℓ+g)d[ℓ−dlog⁡Ξℓ+ℓ−dlog⁡(1−e−ℓd)−CdK12(ℓg)dη(g)], where K1=K+1 bounds nℓ/ℓd for ℓ≥1 and Cd absorbs the fixed shell-count constant and β.

5.1F2step 1.1step 4.1algebra∎

The numbers pℓ=ℓ−dlog⁡Ξℓ lie in [0,q] by step 1.1, so choose ℓj→∞ with pℓj→lim sup⁡ℓ→∞pℓ. Set g=g(ℓj) from [F2]. Then g/ℓj→0, the volume fraction tends to 1, the cutoff logarithm divided by ℓjd tends to zero, and the cross-core error tends to zero. Step 4.1 therefore yields lim inf⁡L→∞pL≥lim sup⁡L→∞pL. The reverse inequality is automatic for every real sequence, so the limit exists; step 1.1 makes it finite.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources