Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular-center TOV local existence and dependence

Statement

Assume ZF+ACω, where ACω is exactly The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) and is inherited from the smooth Lorentzian/tensor suppliers. Let ϵ:Ip→(0,∞) be C∞ on an open interval Ip⊆(0,∞), let Pc⊂Ip be a nonempty compact interval, and choose δ>0 such that the closed δ-neighbourhood of Pc lies in Ip. Fix ϕc∈R and use the units and signature of Smooth static spherical geometry and state domain. Put K=4πG/c4, with formal units m J−1; v has units m−2. There is R0>0, common to all pc∈Pc, such that for each pc there is a unique pair of even continuous functions p,v on [−R0,R0] with ∣p(r)−pc∣≤δ and satisfying v(r)=K∫01s2ϵ(p(rs)) ds,p(r)=pc−∫0rt(ϵ(p(t))+p(t))(v(t)+Kp(t))1−2t2v(t) dt. They are C∞, p(0)=pc, v(0)=Kϵ(pc)/3, p′(0)=v′(0)=0, and b(r):=1−2r2v(r)≥1/2 on [0,R0]. Define M(r)=c2Gr3v(r),ϕ(r)=ϕc+∫0rtv(t)+Kp(t)1−2t2v(t) dt(∣r∣≤R0). Then (M,p,ϕ) satisfies the mass, pressure, and lapse equations of Complete spherical Einstein and conservation reduction for 0<r≤R0. The metric extends across r=0 as a C2 Lorentzian metric in Cartesian spatial coordinates, with b(0)=1 and lapse eϕc>0; this is the regular-center conclusion in this item. On the common interval, p,v,ϕ depend continuously in the uniform norm on pc∈Pc. For r>0, the solution continues past any finite endpoint at which its graph remains in a compact subset of {(r,p,v):r>0, p∈Ip, 1−2r2v>0}. No assertion is made that every equation of state reaches a zero-pressure surface, avoids a horizon globally, or gives a dynamically stable solution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The state domain and SI conventions of Smooth static spherical geometry and state domain, ACω of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), the smooth positive function ϵ on Ip, the compact central-pressure interval Pc, the margin δ, and ϕc.

[F1]

For a smooth isotropic spherical profile, the mass and lapse equations and the pressure equation are exactly those in Complete spherical Einstein and conservation reduction. With GM/c2=r3v they become v′=(Kϵ(p)−3v)/r, p′=−r(ϵ(p)+p)(v+Kp)/(1−2r2v), and ϕ′=r(v+Kp)/(1−2r2v) for r>0.

[F2]

If even C2 functions f,h are used in f(∣x∣) and δij+xixjh(∣x∣), these extend C2 to the Cartesian center; for b=1−r2q the spatial metric coefficients are δij+xixjq/b (Even radial coefficients give a C² Cartesian center).

[F3]

A continuous function on a compact interval is Riemann integrable, and the first fundamental theorem differentiates its variable-endpoint integral at points of continuity (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive). A continuous parameter integrand with continuous parameter derivative on a compact rectangle can be differentiated through its Riemann integral (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral).

[F4]

If a locally Lipschitz ODE solution remains in a compact subset of its open time-state domain near a finite endpoint, it extends beyond that endpoint (Compact continuation for locally Lipschitz ODEs: a solution whose graph stays in a compact subset of the domain near a finite endpoint extends past it clause 1).

[F6]

Closed bounded subsets of Rn are compact, and every continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact subset attains finite extrema (For a nonempty subset of Rn with n≥1, compactness, closedness and boundedness, pseudocompactness, and attainment of extrema by every continuous real-valued function are equivalent).

[F8]

The second FTC evaluates an integral of a continuous derivative; in particular ∫01s2 ds=1/3 and ∫0rt dt=r2/2 (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)).

[F9]

Integral monotonicity and nonnegativity hold for integrable functions on an ordered compact interval; in particular, if g≥0 and −g≤f≤g, then ∣∫f∣≤∫g by comparing with g and −g (If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)). Linearity permits subtraction and scalar multiplication under the integral (Integrable functions on [a,b] form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and ∫ab(λf+μg)=λ∫abf+μ∫abg). Reversing endpoints changes only the sign, and an equal-endpoint integral is zero (The integral with oriented limits: ∫aaf:=0 and ∫baf:=−∫abf), so absolute estimates use the interval with increasingly ordered endpoints.

[F10]

A continuous real function on a compact real interval is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor in R: a continuous real function on a compact subset of R is uniformly continuous).

[A1]

The countable-choice use is the canonical smooth tangent/tensor-bundle structure inherited through The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); no full Axiom of Choice is used. The integral contraction and its iteration below make no selection from an infinite family.

Proof

technique · Choose one common closed pressure interval and uniform contraction bounds for every $p_c\in P_c$; then bootstrap the fixed point to the stated center regularity
1.1givenF1F5F6F8choosealgebra

Write Pc=[p−,p+] and set P=[p−−δ,p++δ]; the margin hypothesis puts P in Ip, and [F6] makes it compact. Thus ϵmax⁡=max⁡Pϵ and Lϵ=max⁡P∣ϵ′∣ exist and are finite. Put V=Kϵmax⁡/3, and first choose R1≤1 with 2R12V≤1/2. The set Q=[−R1,R1]×P×[0,V] is closed and bounded in R3, hence compact by [F6]. On Q, the denominator of H(r,x,y)=(ϵ(x)+x)(y+Kx)1−2r2y is at least 1/2, so H,Hx,Hy are continuous there by [F5]; [F6] supplies finite bounds C for ∣H∣, Cx for ∣Hx∣, and Cy for ∣Hy∣. Set C1=Cx+KLϵCy/3. Choose R0≤R1 so that CR02/2≤δ and C1R02/2≤1/2.

2.1step 1.1givenF3F5F7F8F9F10algebra

For each pc∈Pc, let Bpc be the closed sup-norm ball of radius δ about the constant function pc in C([−R0,R0]). It is complete: a sup-norm Cauchy sequence has pointwise limits in the closed real interval P, the convergence is uniform by the Cauchy bound, and its uniform limit is continuous. For q∈Bpc define v[q](r)=K∫01s2ϵ(q(rs)) ds,(Tpcq)(r)=pc−∫0rtH(t,q(t),v[q](t)) dt. The function ϵ∘q is uniformly continuous on [−R0,R0] by [F10]. Because ∣rs−r~s∣≤∣r−r~∣ for s∈[0,1], [F9] bounds ∣v[q](r)−v[q](r~)∣ by K/3 times sup⁡s∈[0,1]∣ϵ(q(rs))−ϵ(q(r~s))∣, which tends to zero; hence v[q] is continuous. The integrand defining Tpcq is then continuous, so [F3] makes that map continuous as well. By [F9] and [F8], 0≤v[q]≤Kϵmax⁡/3=V; hence 1−2r2v[q]≥1/2. The mean value theorem [F7], linearity and [F9] applied to the bounds ∣s2(ϵ(q(rs))−ϵ(q~(rs)))∣≤s2Lϵ∥q−q~∥∞ give ∥v[q]−v[q~]∥∞≤KLϵ∥q−q~∥∞/3. Applying [F7] successively in the x and y variables gives ∣H(r,x,y)−H(r,x~,y~)∣≤Cx∣x−x~∣+Cy∣y−y~∣ for state pairs in P×[0,V]. For each endpoint r, [F9] bounds the absolute integral of tH or of the difference t(H−H~) by the corresponding constant times the integral of ∣t∣ over the interval between 0 and r. This last integral is r2/2 by [F8]; reversing endpoints changes only the integral sign, and the r=0 case is zero. Hence the bounds in step 1.1, [F9] and [F8] give ∥Tpcq−pc∥∞≤CR02/2≤δ and ∥Tpcq−Tpcq~∥∞≤(C1R02/2)∥q−q~∥∞≤12∥q−q~∥∞. Thus Tpc maps the ball to itself and is a contraction.

3.1step 2.1constructalgebra

Iterate canonically from q0(r)=pc, qj+1=Tpcqj. The differences satisfy ∥qj+1−qj∥∞≤2−j∥q1−q0∥∞, so the geometric tail estimate makes (qj) Cauchy in the complete ball. Its uniform limit p is continuous and remains in the ball. The contraction estimate makes Tpc continuous, hence Tpcp=p; any two fixed points have distance at most half their distance and therefore coincide. If q is even, then v[q] is even, H(r,q(r),v[q](r)) is even, and its product with r is odd, so Tpcq is even. Every iterate and hence p is even; the fixed point equations give the two displayed integral identities.

4.1step 3.1F1F3F5algebra

The first FTC in [F3] makes p continuously differentiable and yields p′(r)=−rH(r,p(r),v[p](r)), including p′(0)=0. The parameter-integral theorem [F3], together with the Ck composition and algebra rules [F5], applied repeatedly on [−R0,R0]×[0,1], shows that whenever p∈Ck, v[p] is Ck because (r,s)↦s2ϵ(p(rs)) has continuous r-derivatives through order k. The denominator is bounded below by 1/2, so H(r,p(r),v[p](r)) is Ck; the integral equation then gives p∈Ck+1. Induction proves p,v are smooth and even. Rewriting the v integral as r3v(r)=K∫0rt2ϵ(p(t)) dt, then applying the product rule and the first FTC gives v′=(Kϵ(p)−3v)/r for r>0; the pressure equation is the defining derivative of p.

4.2A1step 1.1step 3.1F1F5F6F7F8F9algebra

The same R0 and contraction factor work for every central value in Pc. Subtracting the fixed-point equations for pa,pb gives ∥pa−pb∥∞≤∣a−b∣+12∥pa−pb∥∞, hence ∥pa−pb∥∞≤2∣a−b∣. The integral formula for v, [F9] and [F8] give ∥va−vb∥∞≤KLϵ∥pa−pb∥∞/3. The lapse integrand J(r,x,y)=r(y+Kx)/(1−2r2y) and its x,y derivatives are continuous and bounded on the same compact set Q by [F6]. Applying [F7] successively in x,y bounds its state increment by a constant times ∣pa−pb∣+∣va−vb∣; integrating over 0≤r≤R0 with [F9] yields ∥ϕa−ϕb∥∞≤CJR0(∥pa−pb∥∞+∥va−vb∥∞) for a finite CJ. Thus the solution map is continuous in the sup norm. If another regular-center solution stays in the same pressure ball, integrating its mass and pressure equations yields the same two fixed-point equations; uniqueness in step 3.1 proves it is this solution.

5.1A1step 4.1F1F2F5algebra

Set b=1−2r2v and define ϕ by the displayed integral. Then b≥1/2, ϕ is smooth and even, and ϕ′(0)=0. The product rule and the equation for v give M′=4πr2ϵ(p)/c2 from M=c2r3v/G; also GM/c2=r3v, so ϕ′=r(v+Kp)/b is the lapse equation in [F1]. Apply [F2] with q=2v and h=q/b to obtain the C2 Cartesian metric extension. Its center coefficients are g00(0)=−e2ϕc and gij(0)=δij, so it is Lorentzian at the center.

6.1A1step 4.1F1F4F5F6∎

For r>0, let U={(r,p,v):r>0, p∈Ip, 1−2r2v>0} and define the vector field F(r,p,v)=(−r(ϵ(p)+p)(v+Kp)1−2r2v, Kϵ(p)−3vr). By [F5], F is C1 on the open set U. Around each point of U choose a closed time-state cylinder [r−,r+]×B‾((p∗,v∗),η)⊂U. It is a closed bounded subset of R3, hence compact by [F6]. The state derivative of F is continuous there, and its operator norm is continuous, so [F6] gives a finite uniform bound L. For each fixed r∈[r−,r+], the state ball is convex and open; the mean-value inequality [thm-mean-value-inequality-for-total-derivatives] gives ∥F(r,z)−F(r,z~)∥2≤L∥z−z~∥2 on it. Thus F is locally Lipschitz in the state variable, locally uniformly in time, as required by [F4]. If the solution graph remains in a compact subset of U near a finite endpoint, [F4] extends (p,v) past that endpoint. The integral defining ϕ then also extends. This is only the stated compact-interior continuation criterion; it gives no global surface or stability claim.

Remarks

The integral contraction resolves the coordinate singularity at r=0 directly. The ordinary ODE continuation theorem is used only on r>0, where the vector field is smooth. The proof is conditional mathematics under the stated EOS and ACω convention; it does not assert that an observed star follows this model.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources