How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-group BF state sums, gauge groupoids and gluing — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite-group BF state sums, gauge groupoids and gluing
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Products and Amalgamation
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Holonomy and discrete geometric interfaces
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Hurewicz Whitehead Freudenthal and Cw Approximation
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Seifert–van Kampen Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Abelian finite BF counts on S³ and T³
Example
For a finite abelian group , the untwisted finite BF normalization gives
These scalar amplitudes need not equal one.
Example references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite abelian group and the untwisted finite BF amplitude of a connected closed finite CW complex.
Finite BF partition function is a topological invariant: for connected , .
A finite connected CW complex has the edge-and-2-cell presentation: the fundamental group is computed from the 1-cells and 2-cell attaching words; cells of dimension at least three do not change it.
Verification
Give its CW structure with one 0-cell and one 3-cell. Its 1-skeleton has no non-tree edges and it has no 2-cell relators, so [F2] gives . There is exactly one homomorphism from the trivial group to , and [F1] gives .
Give its CW structure with one 0-cell, three 1-cells , three 2-cells attached along the commutators , , and , and one 3-cell. By [F2], . The isomorphism sends to : it is surjective because these generators generate the presented group, and its inverse sends to the standard basis because the relators are satisfied.
A homomorphism is determined by the images of its three standard generators. Every triple in satisfies the commutation relations because is abelian, so . Equation [F1] now gives . For , the two amplitudes are and , respectively, so neither normalization forces every scalar amplitude to be one.