Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 2 also cleared it.

Quantum Groups at Roots of Unity and Tilting Quotients: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This companion checks the A-page conventions in two rank-one cases. The companion A page proves the higher-rank Frobenius and Verlinde results.

Companion: quantum-groups-at-roots-of-unity-and-tilting-quotients.

Worked example

At a primitive fifth root ζ, the rank-one root-power quotient has basis {F‾ aK‾ bE‾ c:0≤a,b,c<5} and therefore dimension 53=125. The calculation is the specialization of the A-page basis theorem, not a general higher-rank dimension formula.

Counterexample

The identity-on-generators map from the rank-one De Concini–Kac specialization to the Lusztig divided-power specialization is not injective at order five: the source element E5 is nonzero by its PBW basis and its image vanishes by E5=[5]ζ!E(5)=0. This refutes preservation of injectivity under this specialization.

The source and calculation details are recorded in the batch-68 coverage ledger.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The rank-one small quantum group at a primitive fifth root has dimension 125

Example

Let ζ be a primitive fifth root of unity and let uζ(sl2) be the rank-one root-power quotient of De Concini–Kac, Lusztig, and small quantum-group forms at roots of unity. Its generators satisfy E5=F5=0 and K5=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A primitive fifth root ζ and the rank-one quotient uζ(sl2).

[F1]

For every odd ℓ>2, the quotient has basis {F‾ aK‾ bE‾ c:0≤a,b,c<ℓ} and dimension ℓ3 (The rank-one root-power quotient is a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra).

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

Since ζ has order five, ζ5=1 and ζ2 also has order five. In particular ζ−ζ−1≠0, so the rank-one root forms and the quotient in [F1] are defined at this parameter.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

Substitute ℓ=5 in the basis assertion [F1]. The exponents a,b,c each range independently over {0,1,2,3,4}, so this basis has 5⋅5⋅5=125 elements. Hence dim⁡Cuζ(sl2)=125.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

At order five, the rank-one form specialization map is not injective

Statement refuted

For every odd root order ℓ>2, the natural generator map UζDK(sl2)→UζL(sl2) is injective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The asserted injectivity for all odd ℓ>2, and the rank-one root forms at a primitive fifth root.

[F1]

The identity-on-generators comparison map is well-defined and kills Eℓ although Eℓ is nonzero in its source, for each odd ℓ>2 (The rank-one De Concini–Kac to Lusztig specialization map is not injective).

Counterexample

1.1givenF1algebra

The value ℓ=5 is an odd integer greater than 2, and a primitive fifth root satisfies the root-order hypotheses in the refuted statement.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra∎

Apply [F1] at ℓ=5: the source element E5 is nonzero and its image is zero. Therefore the map is not injective, contradicting the asserted universal injectivity.

Sources