Alphabeta Math
Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Normal boost action of the Hawking flow

PDF p. 17: (3.9); PDF p. 18: (3.11)

Statement

Adopt the stationary vacuum model and regular stationary data, with T∣S≢0, maximal original exterior section and mass normalized to one. Use the common reference collar and its smooth Lorentzian Harrison family gq, q∈[0,1]. Here S is the spacelike bifurcation surface, K is the fixed Hawking Killing field, ϕsK is its maximal flow, and κ>0 is its fixed boost rate. On S, let nˉq be the future unit normal to the reference section and νˉq the unit normal to S within that section pointing into the exterior. These form an orthonormal basis of the gq-normal plane of S, with nˉq timelike.

For every p∈S, q∈[0,1], and s,α∈R, the flow fixes p and

dϕsK∣p(cosh⁡α νˉq+sinh⁡α nˉq)=cosh⁡(α+κs) νˉq+sinh⁡(α+κs) nˉq.

In particular, dϕsK∣pνˉq=cosh⁡(κs)νˉq+sinh⁡(κs)nˉq.

The original-section maximality premise is imposed on the actual physical exterior section C=Σ0∩E for the original metric g, so Hg∣C=0. Where this result uses the original reference section Σ1, it denotes the closure B=C∪S of this actual section. Maximality of a separately labelled chart-side region or another supplied section is not substituted for this premise. The spherical identification and the physical stationary end chart remain independent. Regular non-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime Spacelike sections, maximality and lapse–shift data

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The common collar gives the stated normal fields, K∣S=0, and ∇νˉq(q)K=κnˉq on S for the same κ>0. Lemma 3.3: common spacelike reference collar The local Hawking-field result identifies K and its positive normalization. Local Hawking and axial fields, boost and pole The horizon-preservation result supplies LKgq=0 on a neighborhood of S for every q∈[0,1]. Preservation of bifurcate horizons and surface gravity

[F2]

For a Killing field, the metric-compatible connection satisfies gq(∇v(q)K,w)+gq(v,∇w(q)K)=0. Killing fields and conserved currents, and on-shell conservation of the Hilbert stress-energy tensor

[F3]

A local flow follows integral curves, and the maximal integral curve through a point is unique. Local and global flows generated by a vector field Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve For a smooth vector field on a smooth manifold M, the set of pairs (t,x) for which the maximal integral curve from x is defined at t is open in R×M, and evaluation along those curves is the unique smooth maximal local flow. The fundamental theorem on flows

[F4]

If a Killing field vanishes on a spacelike surface and its normal derivative has boost matrix κ(0110) in a future-timelike and outward-spacelike orthonormal basis, its flow differential has the corresponding hyperbolic boost matrix wherever the flow is defined. Normal boost action and invariant two-forms at a fixed surface

Proof

Given: The model, collar, fields and parameter ranges in the Statement.

Goal: Prove the displayed normal action and its zero-rapidity specialization.

1.1A1F1F2

Fix p∈S and q∈[0,1], and put B(v)=∇v(q)K∣p. Since K vanishes along S, B(X)=0 for X∈TpS. By the Killing equation, gq(Bv,X)=−gq(v,BX)=0, so B preserves the normal plane. The collar gives Bνˉq=κnˉq. Write Bnˉq=anˉq+bνˉq; skewness gives a=0 and b=κ. Thus B has the matrix required in [F4] in the ordered basis (nˉq,νˉq).

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

The constant curve at p is an integral curve of K on all of R. By maximality and uniqueness it is the maximal integral curve through p, with domain Ip=R. Apply the maximal-flow theorem in [F3] to the smooth field K on its open neighborhood of S: its smooth maximal flow has open domain D={(t,x):t∈Ix} and evaluates the maximal integral curves. Thus (s,p)∈D and ϕsK(p)=p for every real s. For each such s, openness gives a neighborhood of p on which the time-s map is smooth, so dϕsK∣p exists. Applying [F4] with the matrix from step 1.1 gives dϕsKνˉq=cosh⁡(κs)νˉq+sinh⁡(κs)nˉq and dϕsKnˉq=sinh⁡(κs)νˉq+cosh⁡(κs)nˉq. Linearity and the hyperbolic addition formulas yield the displayed action for every real α; setting α=0 gives the particular formula.

Source notes

These premises specify the generated conditional scope and are not attributed to the original article. The substantive local horizon conclusions are retained. The immutable original extraction is unchanged; in particular, original Theorem 1.1 retains its unresolved source-assessment status.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources