How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The actual EM point calculation through an étale chart
PDF p. 17: Corollary6.9 supported factor calculation
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the compatible nested universe and site bounds of the supplied actual EM coefficient and perfect K-theory constructions. Let be algebraically closed and let be a smooth affine finite-type -scheme of pure dimension three, with closed point . Use the actual EM supported Chern operation and the residue-object and cycle generators and fixed by the supplied positive-coordinate construction. For every integer , The calculation is obtained by pullback from the origin of affine three-space through a smooth-point étale chart; it asserts no comparison with an independently constructed classical RR Chern operation.
Facts & Assumptions
Assume The Axiom of Choice and the compatible nested universes containing required by the coefficient, perfect K-theory and supported-cycle suppliers. Universe existence is a separate assumption. The same bounds are used on the affine charts and all restriction diagrams below.
A smooth point has the exact finite-type excision pair gives the finite separable residue extension at a smooth closed point under its perfect-field hypotheses. Algebraic closedness makes every irreducible nonconstant polynomial linear, hence separable, so Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable and Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable discharge both perfect-field conventions. A field is algebraically closed exactly when every nonconstant polynomial splits, equivalently when it has no nontrivial finite extension makes this finite residue extension trivial. Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point identifies the relative dimension here with three, using its finite-type component formula and the identity field extension. Smooth maps have étale local affine-space form therefore provides an affine open neighbourhood of étale over .
Finite-type field schemes lie in the qcqs source domain checks the qcqs domain for every open of . Every affine scheme is quasi-compact makes the affine fibres below quasi-compact under Choice. Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it and A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open provide a principal affine neighbourhood inside any specified open neighbourhood of a point in an affine chart. Reference 0 supplies openness of the étale locus, preservation under open restriction and composition, and flatness; reference 1 supplies its fibre description. A fibre over a closed point is closed; on affine charts its scheme is given by the tensor product in [F3].
Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes fixes the functorial K-theory, its supported categories, pullback on pairs and residue-object classes. Coherent derived tensor and pullback on perfect complexes identifies actual affine perfect pullback with derived extension of scalars on bounded finite-projective representatives. Affine-local flatness turns flatness of an affine morphism into flatness of its ring map, and Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms supplies exactness of tensor with that flat algebra. Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products identifies its fibre ring as . M⊗_RR/I≅ M/IM naturally identifies this with for and . The origin's coordinate Koszul resolution and its actual supported calculation are supplied by The actual EM Chern operation on the standard point.
Actual supported Chern operation and its smooth comparison constructs the actual pointed natural transformation on perfect K-spaces before taking restriction fibres. Thus its naturality applies to an étale map of the entire restriction arrows and hence to their support fibres; its open-excision assertion applies on these qcqs opens. A specified étale-natural comparison with supported cycles supplies the specified comparison, natural for étale and open maps, and gives when the scheme-theoretic inverse image of the reduced rational origin is exactly the reduced rational point . Positive supported coordinates at a smooth threefold point selects its positive classes by this same and provides the open-excision identifications. These are actual maps and selected classes, rather than arbitrary identifications of cyclic groups.
Smooth morphism of schemes makes smoothness unchanged by open source restriction. Finite type is affine-local on source and target supplies affine locality of local finite type. Together with Locally finite type and finite type morphisms, a quasi-compact morphism locally of finite type is finite type. Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms defines quasi-compactness by inverse images of quasi-compact target opens. Affine schemes and affine morphisms are separated makes every morphism between affine schemes separated, in particular each affine chart's structure map to . Open and closed immersions are separated and Separated morphisms compose then give separatedness of its open subschemes over . These are the domain inputs for the smooth separated finite-type comparison in [F4], including the punctured complements in its restriction arrows.
External input
Import only the étale openness, restriction, composition and flatness facts of reference 0 and the fibre classification of reference 1, as used in [F2]–[F3]. Their deeper algebraic proofs remain imported. The smooth chart is supplied by the declared Math theorem. The isolation of its fibre, the residue-object pullback calculation and the application to the actual supported Chern operation are locally proved below.
Proof
Given: The smooth affine pure threefold, closed point, actual operations and positive generators, Choice and fixed size assumptions above.
Goal: Prove for every integer using the stated étale chart and actual supported operations.
By [F1], is rational and there is an affine neighbourhood with a map to that is étale at . Its étale locus is open by reference 0; refine inside it to a principal affine neighbourhood using [F2]. The resulting is étale everywhere. Its image at has coordinates . Replace each coordinate by , whose inverse translation adds ; this gives an étale map sending to . Both translations are inverse polynomial morphisms, so this composition preserves étaleness. The scheme-theoretic zero fibre is affine and quasi-compact by [F2]–[F3]. Reference 1 makes it a discrete disjoint union of finite separable field spectra; quasi-compactness makes the union finite, and algebraic closedness in [F1] makes every field . Thus it is a finite disjoint union of reduced rational points. Its points are closed in , because the fibre is closed and its finite discrete points are closed in that fibre. Delete the other points and use [F2] to choose a principal affine neighbourhood of inside the remaining open. Restriction of stays étale by reference 0, and its entire scheme-theoretic zero fibre is now the single reduced rational point . The point codimension is three: the neighbourhood result in [F1] gives this at , whose local ring is unchanged by open restriction, and the origin has its three coordinate parameters. Before applying [F4], check the schemes in its whole restriction diagram. Every open of is quasi-compact by [F2], smooth by the open-source property in [F5], and locally of finite type over by [F5]. Its structure morphism is quasi-compact: the only opens of are the empty and whole subsets, and their inverse images are quasi-compact. Hence is finite type over by [F5]. The affine -scheme is separated over by [F5], and its open complement is separated by the open-immersion and composition assertions there. The target is the smooth affine standard chart of the projective test in [F3]; the same argument gives finite type and separatedness for it and its punctured complement. Thus both and its restriction to the complements lie between smooth separated finite-type schemes over the same perfect field, with the fixed size bounds in [A1]. These domain checks and the reduced rational fibre and codimension checks are precisely the hypotheses of [F4].
Write and . By reference 0 and [F3], is flat over . The bounded free coordinate Koszul resolution of from [F3], pulled back by the actual perfect functor, is its termwise tensor with . Exactness of this tensor identifies the result with . Step 1.1 identifies its affine scheme with the reduced point , so as a -module this is exactly its residue sheaf, with its quotient action. Hence actual supported pullback sends to , and sends to for every integer . By [F4], . Naturality of the actual pointed transformation on the restriction square, followed by functoriality of homotopy fibres, therefore gives , using the standard calculation in [F3]. Open excision in [F4] transfers this equality from to the original , preserving the selected generators. No isomorphism or injectivity of the support-to-global map on is used, and no independent classical Chern operation is substituted for the actual EM operation.
Reading limits
This maintenance read the full current assigned body, all 21 current direct supplier interfaces, the projective test argument, the Chern-operation fibre construction, and the direct RR/global-square consumer. It additionally read the seven published Math interfaces now declared in [F5]. The domain argument verifies smoothness, finite type and separatedness for the actual chart and the entire punctured restriction diagram before applying the supplied cycle comparison. The Statement, point calculation, source maps, selected generators and coverage are unchanged, so the direct consumer needs no edit. The two Stacks readings in the incoming source records remain historical; no fresh primary-source reading, independent operation-comparison theorem, library audit or independent acceptance is claimed. Central rendering and changed-item rejudgment remain with the engine.
Depends on
- The actual EM Chern operation on the standard point
- Actual supported Chern operation and its smooth comparison
- Positive supported coordinates at a smooth threefold point
- A specified étale-natural comparison with supported cycles
- A smooth point has the exact finite-type excision pair
- Finite-type field schemes lie in the qcqs source domain
- Smooth maps have étale local affine-space form
- Relative dimension of a smooth morphism at a point
- A field is algebraically closed exactly when every nonconstant polynomial splits, equivalently when it has no nontrivial finite extension
- Perfect fields: every irreducible polynomial is separable
- Every algebraic extension of a perfect field is separable
- Every affine scheme is quasi-compact
- Every point of a Zariski-open set has a distinguished-open neighbourhood inside it
- A principal localization identifies its spectrum with a distinguished open
- Affine-local flatness
- Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms
- Coherent derived tensor and pullback on perfect complexes
- Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products
- M⊗_RR/I≅ M/IM naturally
- The Axiom of Choice
- Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Finite type is affine-local on source and target
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms
- Affine schemes and affine morphisms are separated
- Open and closed immersions are separated
- Separated morphisms compose
- The Stacks Project, étale locality and flatness · Definition 29.37.1 and the following openness paragraph; Lemma 29.37.2 with restriction clause; Lemmas 29.37.3 and 29.37.12, with their short proofs
- The Stacks Project, fibres of étale morphisms · Lemma 29.37.7(1)–(2), complete statement and direct proof
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The étale locus is open; étaleness is affine-local, survives open restriction and composition, and implies flatness.
Hypotheses: Morphisms of schemes; no separation, finiteness or nonemptiness hypothesis beyond the stated affine charts.
Reading limits: Historical source-reading record from the incoming item: Read the live primary extraction of the named definition, complete specified lemma statements and their short proofs on 12 November 2026. The linked algebraic foundations remain imported. Only openness, restriction, composition and flatness are used here; no independent comparison of Chern operations is imported. Current maintenance checked the supplied citation contract and added published Math interfaces for comparison-domain hypotheses; it did not reread this primary page or reconstruct its imported foundations.
An étale fibre over a field is a disjoint union of spectra of finite separable extensions; each affine étale scheme over a field is a finite such union.
Hypotheses: An étale scheme morphism and a point of its target, or a scheme étale over a field. The general disjoint union need not be finite.
Reading limits: Historical source-reading record from the incoming item: Read the full live primary statement and its direct proof on 12 November 2026. Finiteness below comes from quasi-compactness of the affine fibre. The classification theorem invoked by that proof is imported, not reconstructed. Current maintenance checked the supplied citation contract and added published Math interfaces for comparison-domain hypotheses; it did not reread this primary page or reconstruct its imported foundations.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, étale locality and flatness · Definition 29.37.1 and the following openness paragraph; Lemma 29.37.2 with restriction clause; Lemmas 29.37.3 and 29.37.12, with their short proofs
- The Stacks Project, fibres of étale morphisms · Lemma 29.37.7(1)–(2), complete statement and direct proof