How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-type field schemes lie in the qcqs source domain
PDF p. 6: Proposition 2.6 proof: finite-type evaluation domain
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a field and a finite-type morphism. Then the underlying topological space of is Noetherian and every open subset of is quasi-compact. In particular, is quasi-compact and quasi-separated (qcqs), without a separatedness or reducedness hypothesis. Finite type means locally of finite type and quasi-compact: here it gives an affine open cover with coordinate algebras finitely generated over . Noetherian means that every increasing sequence of open subsets stabilizes; quasi-compact means that every open cover has a finite subcover; quasi-separated means that intersections of affine open subschemes are quasi-compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field , finite-type -scheme , and the Axiom of Choice.
Goal: Verify the qcqs evaluation domain without imposing separatedness.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed for the Noetherian-spectrum and open-subset compactness results below.
Field, Schemes and Morphisms of schemes supply the field and scheme-morphism structures. By Affine schemes and their coordinate rings an affine scheme has a coordinate-ring presentation as a spectrum; The underlying space of an affine spectrum and The prime spectrum and vanishing sets identify its underlying points with prime ideals. An affine open carries the restricted structure sheaf by Affine open subschemes. Finitely generated -algebra means finite type over in Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras.
Locally finite type and finite type morphisms supplies local finite type and quasi-compactness of the structure morphism. By Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms, inverse images of quasi-compact opens are quasi-compact. To check the base, A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian says the only ideals of are and . The ideal is proper because , and it is prime: if with , multiplication by gives . Thus [F0] identifies with a one-point space. Any open cover has a member containing that point, so this member is a finite subcover. In particular is quasi-compact. For a nonempty affine neighbourhood supplied by local finite type, its image lies in a nonempty affine open of this one-point base, necessarily the whole base. Hence its coordinate algebra is finitely generated over , giving the stated affine cover.
A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian and Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring make those coordinate algebras Noetherian. Under [A1], The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space makes their spectra Noetherian topological spaces.
Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets supplies the increasing-open-sequence definition. Under [A1], Noetherian open subsets are quasi-compact makes every open subset of a Noetherian space quasi-compact. Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes supplies the two scheme conditions in the conclusion.
Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace gives the topology on an open subset as the traces of opens of . In particular the intersections in step 1.1 are open in each .
Proof
If is empty, it is Noetherian and all its opens are quasi-compact. Otherwise [F1] gives a finite subcover of the affine cover with finitely generated -coordinate algebras. Each is Noetherian by [F2] under [A1]. For any increasing sequence of opens of , the sequence consists of opens of by [F4] and stabilizes for each . Take the maximum of the finitely many stabilization indices. For the intersections of and with every coincide, so the covering property gives . Thus is Noetherian by [F3].
Apply the open-subset compactness theorem in [F3] to the Noetherian space from step 1.1, under [A1]. Every open subset of is quasi-compact. In particular itself and each intersection of two affine opens are quasi-compact, giving qcqs by [F3]. Neither the finite affine cover nor this argument uses separatedness or reducedness.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated morphisms
- Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes
- Noetherian topological spaces via ACC on opens or DCC on closed subsets
- A field has only the zero ideal and itself, hence is Noetherian
- Every algebra of finite type over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian ring
- The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space
- Noetherian open subsets are quasi-compact
- Field
- Schemes
- Morphisms of schemes
- Affine schemes and their coordinate rings
- The underlying space of an affine spectrum
- The prime spectrum and vanishing sets
- Affine open subschemes
- Subalgebra generated by a subset, algebras of finite type, and module-finite algebras
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
Used by · 20
- Affine étale vanishing and the actual localized evaluation
- Factor two in the supported third Chern map
- Prescribing three Chern classes successively
- External canonical top-weight motivic-to-syntomic comparison
- The full top-weight map with its exact factorization
- A smooth point has the exact finite-type excision pair
- Positive supported coordinates at a smooth threefold point
- Actual supported Chern operation and its smooth comparison
- An integral P³ test fixes the supported RR coefficient as positive two
- The actual supported third edge sends the positive point class to its residue object
- Supported RR and the actual support-to-global application
- External actual supported Riemann–Roch in codimension three
- Integral oriented field coefficient comparison with actual Picard and support maps
- The low-dimensional quotient follows from the stage sequence
- Projective relations transport the actual universal Chern operations
- The field comparison preserves refined smooth Gysin and the point class
- Canonical comparison and restriction from the prime field
- A specified étale-natural comparison with supported cycles
- The actual EM point calculation through an étale chart
- Independent Navarro and EM Chern operations on the smooth separated site
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.