Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Completion inside the join separator

PDF p. 2: Section 3, ordinary classes, red n-vertex set

Statement

Let H2 be a finite simple graph of order n≥1, and let k≥2 be an integer. Form G=H2∨K(k−1)(n−1) from disjoint copies. Every k-colouring of V(G) has at least n vertices of one colour. Any set S of n vertices of that colour induces a graph G[S]=G′∨Kn−ℓ, up to the canonical identification of its parts, where G′ is the graph induced by the ℓ selected vertices in the H2 part and 0≤ℓ≤n. This induced graph contains an ordinary copy of H2, and that copy is monochromatic.

Here the order of a graph is the number of its vertices. A finite simple graph has a finite vertex set and edges that are two-element subsets of it. A k-colouring assigns each vertex one of k colours, without requiring all colours to be used. An induced graph on a vertex set retains exactly the host edges with both endpoints in that set. The join retains the edges in its disjoint parts and adds all cross-edges; Km is the complete graph on m vertices, with every two distinct vertices adjacent. For m=0, K0 is the empty graph, and a join with an empty part has the edges of its other part. An ordinary copy is a subgraph isomorphic to the target, so extra host edges between its vertices are allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: H2, n, k, and G as in the statement, together with a k-colouring of V(G).

Goal: Find n vertices of one colour and prove the stated induced-join and ordinary-copy assertions for every such set.

[F1]

The join has disjoint parts inducing the given graphs and all possible cross-edges. Its construction permits an empty part. Induced subgraphs retain exactly the edges whose endpoints are selected. See Join of graphs and Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs.

[F3]

A k-colouring is a function into {1,…,k}, and a set is monochromatic when all its vertices receive the same value. If a finite set has more than k(n−1) elements, every such colouring has a colour class of at least n elements. See Unrestricted finite colourings and used palettes and Finite colour-class capacity and prescribed partitions.

[F4]

If J has n vertices, W⊆V(J) has ℓ vertices, and C is a disjoint set of n−ℓ vertices, the complete connection of J[W] and the complete graph on C contains an ordinary copy of J. This includes ℓ=0 and ℓ=n. An ordinary embedding gives a copy using its image edges. See Completing a restricted target with universal clique vertices and Ordinary embeddings as injections preserving edges.

[F5]

For natural numbers ℓ≤n, write n−ℓ for the unique natural number q with ℓ+q=n. Existence follows from the additive definition of natural order. Addition is commutative, and a+r=b+r implies a=b; hence ℓ+q=ℓ+q′ implies q=q′. See Order on the natural numbers, Addition is commutative, and Addition is cancellative.

Proof

Given: The graph and colouring in the statement. Goal: Establish the colour-class, induced-join, and monochromatic-copy claims.

1.1givenF1F2F3

Let A and B be the vertex sets of the actual H2 and clique parts of G, respectively, and put J=G[A]. The join provides a canonical bijection ι:V(H2)→A preserving and reflecting edges, so J is a copy of H2. Thus ∣A∣=n and ∣B∣=(k−1)(n−1). Their disjoint union has n+(k−1)(n−1)=k(n−1)+1 vertices. By colour-class capacity, some colour class has at least n vertices; choose any n of them and call the resulting set S.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F5

Put W=S∩A, C=S∩B, and ℓ=∣W∣. These are subsets of the actual vertex sets of the join: W⊆V(J)=A and C⊆B, so W∩C=∅ and W∪C=S. The subset bound and sum rule give 0≤ℓ≤n and ℓ+∣C∣=n. The unique-gap characterization in F5 therefore gives ∣C∣=n−ℓ. The edges induced on W are exactly those of J[W], those on C form a complete graph, and all cross-edges are present. Thus G[S] is the complete connection of J[W] and the complete graph on C, giving the stated join with G′=J[W] up to the canonical identification of its parts. This description also holds when either selected part is empty.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F3F4∎

Apply the completion lemma to J=G[A], W, and C. Step 2.1 verifies its set-disjointness and cardinality hypotheses, including at ℓ=0 or ℓ=n. It yields an ordinary embedding f:V(J)→S into G[S]. Define h(v)=f(ι(v)) for v∈V(H2). If h(u)=h(v), injectivity of f and then of ι gives u=v; each edge of H2 maps through ι to an edge of J and then through f to an edge of G[S]. Hence h is an ordinary embedding of H2 into G[S] and yields an ordinary copy. Every vertex of that copy lies in S, whose vertices all have the same colour; hence the copy is monochromatic. Since S was arbitrary among the n-vertex sets in a colour class, the conclusion holds for every such set.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources