How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Characters and the Orthogonality Relations — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Semidirect Products, Automorphism Groups and Split Extensions
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symmetric Polynomials and the Fundamental Theorem of Symmetric Functions
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples turn the companion page's theorems into explicit tables. The cyclic group opens the page: its irreducible characters are the powers of a primitive -th root of unity, and its table checks both orthogonality relations and the sum-of-squares formula. The standard representation of is then computed from fixed points, and that character supplies the degree data for the full table, which is verified against both relations and used to decompose the tensor square .
The larger symmetric groups follow the same route. The normal Klein four subgroup of yields its three lifted degree-one characters and its four conjugacy classes, completing the table; the five cycle-type classes of complete its table, whose kernels are intersected to recover exactly , , , and as the normal subgroups.
The final pair of tables is the cautionary landmark. and have identical character tables although the groups are not isomorphic, so a character table cannot always distinguish a finite group. The companion false statements isolate the other easy mistakes: a character is not a homomorphism, irreducible character values need not be real, distinct irreducibles may share a degree, and a class function of self-inner product need not be a character.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The irreducible complex characters of a finite cyclic group are the powers of a primitive th root
Example
Let be a cyclic group of order , and let be a primitive -th root of unity. The irreducible complex characters of are exactly
and they are pairwise distinct.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A cyclic group of order .
A cyclic group of order is isomorphic to (Every cyclic group is isomorphic to or to for its finite order ).
Choosing a basis identifies degree-one representations with homomorphisms , and two such representations are equivalent exactly when the homomorphisms agree (Equivalence classes of degree-one representations are exactly homomorphisms ; equivalently they factor through , and they form an abelian group).
The roots of in a field form a finite cyclic subgroup whose order divides . This group contains a primitive -th root exactly when it has order , and in that case its generators are exactly the primitive -th roots. ( is cyclic of order dividing , and has a primitive -th root of unity exactly when its order is )
Over a field of characteristic not dividing , a splitting field of has exactly distinct -th roots of unity, and they form a cyclic group of order exactly ( is separable over exactly when the characteristic does not divide , and then a splitting field carries distinct -th roots of unity).
Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar (Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar).
A field is a splitting field for a finite group exactly when every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring (A splitting field for a finite group: every irreducible representation has scalar endomorphism ring).
Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field has degree (Every irreducible representation of a finite abelian group over a splitting field is one-dimensional).
Verification
Since , a homomorphism sends to an -th root of unity: . By [F4] the -th roots of unity in are exactly the distinct powers of a primitive root of [F3].
For each , the formula is well defined by [F1] and is a homomorphism, since . They are pairwise distinct because for by primitivity of [F3].
By [F5] and [F6], is a splitting field for the finite abelian group ; then [F7] shows every irreducible representation of has degree . By [F2] it corresponds to a homomorphism , and step 1.1 shows for some , so . Hence the irreducible characters are exactly the .
The character table of a finite cyclic group over
Example
For cyclic of order and a primitive -th root of unity, the character table has rows and columns with entry (). Both orthogonality relations hold, and the squared degrees sum to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A cyclic group of order and a primitive -th root of unity .
The irreducible characters are for , pairwise distinct (The irreducible complex characters of a finite cyclic group are the powers of a primitive th root).
Vieta's formulas: if the monic splits as , then (Vieta's formulas identify the coefficients of a split monic polynomial with elementary symmetric functions of its roots).
The first orthogonality relation reads (The first orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
The second orthogonality relation reads when is conjugate to and otherwise (The second orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
In , , because the two sides have the same degree, the same roots, and are monic.
Verification
By [F1] the entry in row and column is , so the table has the stated shape.
If , then is trivial and for the unique value . Assume now that . Then the polynomial has coefficient at , so [A1] and [F2] give . More generally, if then ; if , the element has order , where , so Here , and the inner sum vanishes by the same Vieta argument applied to . Thus is when and otherwise.
Row orthogonality: by [F3] and step 1.1, , and the last sum is when and otherwise by step 1.2, which matches .
Column orthogonality: by [F4] and step 1.1, , which is when and otherwise by step 1.2; since is abelian every centralizer is , so this is exactly .
All degrees are , so .
The standard representation of has character equal to the number of fixed points minus
Example
For , let act on by permutation and let be the permutation representation. The standard representation is the subrepresentation
and its character is , where is the number of fixed points of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and a permutation acting on .
The character of a permutation representation is the number of fixed points of the action (The character of a permutation representation counts fixed points).
Characters add on direct sums (Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals).
The permutation representation decomposes as , where is a copy of the trivial representation and is its stated complement.
Verification
The line of constant vectors is fixed pointwise by every permutation, so it is a trivial subrepresentation, and the sum map is preserved by every permutation, so its kernel is a subrepresentation. Every vector decomposes uniquely as a constant vector plus a vector of sum zero, which is [A1].
By [F2] applied to [A1], the permutation character satisfies . The trivial character is the constant , so .
By [F1], , the number of fixed points. Combining with step 1.2 gives .
has three irreducible complex characters of degrees , , and
Example
The symmetric group has exactly three irreducible complex characters: the trivial character , the sign character , and the standard character ; their degrees are , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The symmetric group acting on .
The conjugacy classes of are indexed by cycle types (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ).
The degrees of all irreducible characters satisfy (The regular character gives a second proof of the sum-of-squares formula).
The sign representation is the one-dimensional representation in which acts by (The sign representation of and the restriction of a representation to a subgroup).
The standard character of is (The standard representation of has character equal to the number of fixed points minus ).
A complex character is irreducible exactly when its self-inner-product is (A complex character is irreducible if and only if its self-inner-product is ).
The standard inner product of class functions on a group of order is .
Verification
By [F1] the cycle types of are the identity type, the type of a transposition, and the type of a -cycle, so has three conjugacy classes; a direct count of each type gives class sizes , , and .
By [F3] the trivial and sign characters are distinct one-dimensional characters, hence irreducible: a one-dimensional space has no proper nonzero subspaces. Their degrees are and .
By [F4], the standard character has values , , and on the three classes of step 1.1 (fixed points , , and minus ). Using [A1], , so by [F5] the standard character is irreducible, of degree .
The three irreducible characters of steps 1.2 and 2.1 have squared degrees . By [F2] the sum over all irreducible characters is also , so no further irreducible character exists.
The character table of
Example
The character table of , with columns indexed by the classes of , , and (sizes , , ), is
Both orthogonality relations hold for this table.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The symmetric group with its three irreducible characters , , .
has exactly three irreducible characters of degrees , , and , and its classes have sizes , , ( has three irreducible complex characters of degrees , , and ).
The first orthogonality relation: the rows are orthonormal (The first orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
The second orthogonality relation: distinct columns are orthogonal and the squared norm of a column is the centralizer size (The second orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
for even and for odd , so on the three class representatives it is , , .
The standard character is , with values , , on the three representatives.
Verification
By [F1] there are three irreducible characters and three classes; [A1] and [A2] supply the second and third rows, and the trivial character is the constant . Hence the displayed table is the character table.
Row orthogonality: the rows and have inner product , the row with gives , with gives , and each row has self-inner-product ; this matches [F2].
Column orthogonality: the first column has squared norm ; the second has ; the third has ; and each pair of distinct columns has inner product , , , matching [F3].
The square of the two-dimensional character decomposes as
Example
The tensor square of the two-dimensional irreducible representation of has character , and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The irreducible characters , , of .
The character table of gives the values on the classes of , , (The character table of ).
Characters multiply on tensor products (Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals).
The multiplicity of an irreducible character in a given character is the inner product with it (The multiplicity of an irreducible summand is a character inner product).
The inner product is .
Verification
By [F2], the tensor square of the two-dimensional representation has character ; from [F1] its values are on the three classes.
Using [A1] and the values of step 1.1, the multiplicities are , , and . By [F3] these are the coefficients of , , and .
The value at checks: , the sum of the degrees with the multiplicities of step 2.1; hence .
has a normal Klein four subgroup and four conjugacy classes
Example
Let . Then is a normal subgroup of of order , the quotient has order , and has four conjugacy classes, of sizes , , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The alternating group and the subset .
Two permutations of are conjugate exactly when they have the same cycle type (Two elements of are conjugate if and only if they have the same cycle type).
For , the -class of an element of splits into two -classes of equal size exactly when all cycle lengths, -cycles included, are odd and pairwise distinct. (For , an -class of an even permutation splits in exactly when all cycle lengths, including -cycles, are odd and distinct)
For finite and , (If is finite then ; for finite this equals ).
The product of two distinct double transpositions on four letters is the remaining double transposition, and a product of two transpositions is an even permutation; .
Conjugating a double transposition by a permutation of the four letters gives the double transposition .
Verification
By [A1] the three nonidentity elements of are even permutations and multiply pairwise to the third, so is a subgroup of of order .
For the -cycle , the cycle lengths are and , odd and distinct, so [F2] applies: its -class, of size , splits into two -classes of equal size . These two classes account for all eight -cycles of .
By [A2], any conjugate of a double transposition is again a double transposition, and there are exactly three of them; by [F1] they all lie in the single -class of cycle type . Hence every conjugate of every element of lies in , so .
By [F3], .
The identity class of is . For the double transposition , the cycle type has two equal lengths, so [F2] does not apply and its -class does not split: its -class is the whole class of double transpositions, of size by step 2.1.
Every nonidentity element of is a double transposition or a -cycle, so steps 3.1 and 1.2 list all classes: sizes , , , .
The character table of
Example
Let and let the classes of be represented by , , , and (sizes , , , ). The character table is
Both orthogonality relations hold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group , its normal subgroup , a primitive cube root of unity , and the class representatives , , , .
has a normal subgroup of order with quotient of order , and its conjugacy classes have sizes , , , ( has a normal Klein four subgroup and four conjugacy classes).
A group of order is cyclic (Every cyclic group is isomorphic to or to for its finite order ).
Degree-one representations are exactly the homomorphisms (Equivalence classes of degree-one representations are exactly homomorphisms ; equivalently they factor through , and they form an abelian group).
The squared degrees of the irreducible characters sum to (The regular character gives a second proof of the sum-of-squares formula).
Row orthogonality: irreducible characters are orthonormal (The first orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
Column orthogonality: distinct columns are orthogonal, and a column has squared norm the centralizer size (The second orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
A homomorphism that is trivial on factors through the quotient ; conversely, a homomorphism from pulls back to one on that is trivial on .
The commutator equals , and a homomorphism to the abelian group is constant on conjugacy classes.
Verification
By [F1] and [F2] the quotient has order , hence is cyclic. Its three homomorphisms to send a generator to , , or ; by [F3] and [A1], they pull back to three one-dimensional characters of whose values are the first three rows. Conversely, every homomorphism kills commutators, so [A2] makes it kill and therefore, by conjugacy, every nonidentity element of . Hence every degree-one character is trivial on and factors through by [A1]. Thus these are exactly the three one-dimensional characters of .
By [F4], the remaining irreducible degree satisfies , so .
By [F6], the column of is orthogonal to the column of : , so .
By [F6], the column of is orthogonal to the column of : . Since , this forces , hence ; the same argument gives .
The four rows assembled in steps 1.1 through 4.1 form the displayed table. Row orthogonality holds by [F5]: the first three rows are orthonormal ( for the identity, with cross terms ), and , while is orthogonal to each of the first three rows.
Column orthogonality holds by [F6]: the squared norms are , , , , matching the centralizer sizes , , , of the four classes, and distinct columns are orthogonal.
has five conjugacy classes of sizes , , , , and
Example
The group has five conjugacy classes, represented by , , , , and , with sizes , , , , and respectively.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The symmetric group .
The conjugacy classes of are indexed by cycle types (The conjugacy classes of are indexed by the tuples with ).
The class equation counts permutations by cycle type: over all tuples with (The class equation of is ).
The cycle types of elements of are , , , , and .
Verification
By [F1] and [A1], the classes of are exactly those five cycle types.
The class size of a cycle type is by [F2]. For the types of [A1] these sizes are , , , , and .
Matching the representatives , , , , with their cycle types in [A1] and the corresponding values from step 1.2 gives class sizes , , , , . The sum , so the count is complete.
The character table of and the normal subgroups it reveals
Example
The character table of , with columns , , , , (sizes , , , , ), is
The normal subgroups of are exactly , , , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group with class representatives , , , , .
has five conjugacy classes, of sizes , , , , ( has five conjugacy classes of sizes , , , , and ).
The sign representation is the one-dimensional representation in which acts by (The sign representation of and the restriction of a representation to a subgroup).
The standard character is (The standard representation of has character equal to the number of fixed points minus ).
Characters multiply on tensor products (Characters add on direct sums, multiply on tensor products, and conjugate on duals).
A complex character is irreducible exactly when its self-inner-product is (A complex character is irreducible if and only if its self-inner-product is ).
The irreducible complex characters form an orthonormal basis of the class functions (The irreducible complex characters form an orthonormal basis of ).
The squared degrees of the irreducible characters sum to (The regular character gives a second proof of the sum-of-squares formula).
Column orthogonality: distinct columns are orthogonal and a column has squared norm the centralizer size (The second orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
Normal subgroups are exactly intersections of kernels of irreducible characters (The normal subgroups of a finite group are exactly the intersections of kernels of irreducible complex characters).
The kernel of a character of a representation is .
The kernel of a direct sum of representations is the intersection of the kernels of the summands, and a permutation of a set of four letters with exactly two fixed points is a transposition.
For class functions on , the standard inner product is
Verification
By [F2] the sign row is on the representatives: values on even permutations and on odd ones. By [F3], the permutation character of has values , , , , (fixed points), so the standard character has values , , , , .
By [F4], the sign twist has values .
The trivial and sign characters are one-dimensional, hence irreducible. Using [A3] and the values from steps 1.1 and 2.1 gives Because for every , the same computation gives , and multiplying one factor by preserves orthogonality with and with . Therefore , , , and are four pairwise orthogonal irreducible characters, the last two by [F5].
By [F6], irreducible characters form an orthonormal basis of the -dimensional class-function space of , so after the four orthogonal irreducibles of step 3.1 there is exactly one remaining irreducible character, call it . By [F7], its degree satisfies , so .
By [F8], each column is orthogonal to the first column , so reading off the first four entries gives the fifth entry: at , , so ; at , , so ; at , , so ; at , , so .
The five rows from steps 1.1, 2.1, and 5.1 now form an orthonormal basis of the class functions: step 3.1 already handles the first four rows, and Since is orthogonal to the first four rows by construction from step 5.1, this is the displayed character table.
The kernels, by [A1]: ; (the even permutations); , because means , i.e. ; ; , because exactly at the identity and the double transpositions, and [A2] identifies the class with exactly two fixed points as the transpositions.
By [F9], the normal subgroups are exactly the intersections of the five kernels of step 6.2; by [A2] these intersections are , , , and .
The character table of
Example
The character table of , with columns , , , , (sizes , , , , ), is
Both orthogonality relations hold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quaternion group .
has order and is its only element of order ( is a subgroup of with eight elements, and is its only element of order ).
Degree-one representations correspond to homomorphisms (Equivalence classes of degree-one representations are exactly homomorphisms ; equivalently they factor through , and they form an abelian group).
The abelianization is abelian and homomorphisms to abelian groups factor uniquely through it (The derived subgroup is characteristic and the abelianization is universal).
The squared degrees of the irreducible characters sum to (The regular character gives a second proof of the sum-of-squares formula).
Row orthogonality: irreducible characters are orthonormal (The first orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
Column orthogonality: distinct columns are orthogonal and a column has squared norm the centralizer size (The second orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
In , and ; the commutator equals ; the conjugates of are , of are , and of are , so the classes are , , , , .
A homomorphism satisfies , and every assignment , extends to one.
Verification
By [A1] the conjugacy classes of are , , , , , of sizes , , , , .
Since by [A1], ; the quotient has order by [F1] and every element of it squares to , so it is abelian, and [F3] gives with abelianization of order .
By [F2] and [F3], the degree-one characters are the homomorphisms factoring through the abelianization of step 1.2; by [A2] they are exactly the four assignments , for , with sent to . Their values are the first four rows of the table.
By [F4], the remaining irreducible degree satisfies , so .
By [F6], the column of is orthogonal to the column of : , so . The column of is orthogonal to the column of : , so ; likewise and .
The five rows form the displayed table. By [F5], and is orthogonal to each degree-one row, so the table is complete; the degrees sum correctly.
By [F6], the column squared norms are , , , , , equal to the centralizer sizes , , , , , and distinct columns are orthogonal.
The character table of
Example
For , the conjugacy classes are represented by , , , , (sizes , , , , ), and the character table is
Both orthogonality relations hold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The dihedral group with and .
has order , presentation , , and every element has the unique form or ( with inversion action has order and the dihedral relations).
Degree-one representations correspond to homomorphisms (Equivalence classes of degree-one representations are exactly homomorphisms ; equivalently they factor through , and they form an abelian group).
Homomorphisms to abelian groups factor uniquely through the abelianization (The derived subgroup is characteristic and the abelianization is universal).
The squared degrees of the irreducible characters sum to (The regular character gives a second proof of the sum-of-squares formula).
Row orthogonality: irreducible characters are orthonormal (The first orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
Column orthogonality: distinct columns are orthogonal and a column has squared norm the centralizer size (The second orthogonality relation for irreducible complex characters).
From [F1]'s relations: is central; conjugates to ; conjugates to ; and conjugates to . Hence the classes are , , , , .
The commutator equals , the quotient has order and is abelian, and every assignment , with extends to a homomorphism .
Verification
By [A1] the classes are , , , , , of sizes , , , , .
By [A2], , and the quotient of order is abelian; by [F3] the homomorphisms to abelian groups factor through it, so .
By [F2] and [F3], the degree-one characters are the homomorphisms factoring through the abelianization of step 1.2, namely the four assignments of [A2]: , . Their values are the first four rows of the table (with and ).
By [F4], the remaining irreducible degree satisfies , so .
By [F6], the column of is orthogonal to the column of : , so . The columns of , , and are orthogonal to the column of , giving , , and , so .
The five rows form the displayed table. By [F5], and is orthogonal to each degree-one row, so the table is complete; the degrees sum correctly.
By [F6], the column squared norms are , , , , ; the norm of the first column is the group order of [F1], equal to the centralizer size of the identity, and the remaining norms are the centralizer sizes. Distinct columns are orthogonal.
FALSE: nonisomorphic finite groups always have different character tables
Statement
The statement "nonisomorphic finite groups always have different character tables" is false: the quaternion group and the dihedral group are nonisomorphic finite groups with the same character table.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The groups and , both of order .
The character table of has five rows with values , , , , and on the classes of , , , , (The character table of ).
The character table of has five rows with values , , , , and on the classes of , , , , (The character table of ).
is the only element of order in ( is a subgroup of with eight elements, and is its only element of order ).
In , the elements and both have order ( with inversion action has order and the dihedral relations).
Refutation
The row sets of [F1] and [F2] are identical as multisets of tuples, so after a row permutation the two tables agree entry for entry.
By [F3], has exactly one element of order , while by [F4] has at least the two elements and of order . The number of elements of order is invariant under isomorphism, so the two groups are not isomorphic.
The two tables have the same number of rows and columns with the same class sizes , , , , , so they are the same character table up to the labelling of the groups.
Steps 2.1 and 1.2 exhibit nonisomorphic finite groups with the same character table, so the claimed statement is refuted.
FALSE: a complex character of a finite group is always a group homomorphism
Statement
The statement "a complex character of a finite group is always a group homomorphism" is false: the standard character of is not a homomorphism .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group and its standard character .
The character table of gives on the class of the transposition (The character table of ).
A group homomorphism takes values in the multiplicative group , in which is not an element.
Refutation
By [F1], .
If were a homomorphism , then by [A1] its value at would be an element of , in particular nonzero, contradicting step 1.1.
Hence is not a group homomorphism, so the claimed statement is refuted.
FALSE: every value of an irreducible complex character is real
Statement
The statement "every value of an irreducible complex character is real" is false: the nontrivial one-dimensional characters of take the primitive cube root of unity , which is not real, on the -cycles.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group , a primitive cube root of unity , and the irreducible character of the character table with .
The character table of contains the irreducible character with and (The character table of ).
A primitive cube root of unity satisfies : its imaginary part is nonzero.
Refutation
By [F1], the irreducible character of satisfies .
By [A1], , so this value of the irreducible character is not real.
Hence the claimed statement, that every value of an irreducible complex character is real, is refuted by the character at .
FALSE: distinct irreducible complex characters of a finite group have distinct degrees
Statement
The statement "distinct irreducible complex characters of a finite group have distinct degrees" is false: the group has four distinct irreducible characters of degree .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group and its character table.
The character table of has the four distinct irreducible characters , , , , whose rows all begin with the value (The character table of ).
The degree of an irreducible character is its value at the identity, the first column of the table.
Refutation
By [F1], the four characters of are distinct irreducible characters.
By [F1] and [A1], each of these four has degree , since each row begins with the value at the identity.
Hence four distinct irreducible characters share the degree , so the claimed statement is refuted.
FALSE: every complex class function with self-inner-product is a character
Statement
The statement "every complex class function with self-inner-product is a character" is false: for a nontrivial finite group with trivial character , the class function has self-inner-product but is not a character.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite cyclic group of order , its trivial character , and the class function defined by for every .
The cyclic group of order has the trivial irreducible character with for every (The character table of a finite cyclic group over ).
A complex character is irreducible exactly when its self-inner-product is (A complex character is irreducible if and only if its self-inner-product is ).
The inner product satisfies for a scalar , so .
Every character of a representation satisfies .
Refutation
The constant function is a class function, because it is constant on , hence constant on every conjugacy class.
By [F1] and [F2], the trivial character satisfies ; by [A1], .
If were a character of some representation, then by [A2] its value at would be nonnegative, but . Hence is not a character.
Steps 1.1 through 1.3 exhibit a class function with self-inner-product that is not a character, so the claimed statement is refuted.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Section 3.3
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Section 4.1
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Section 3.7
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Example 3.1.2
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Section 3.5
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Example 3.16
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Example 3.3.5
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, Example 3.15
- Shani Meynet and Robert Moscrop, McKay quivers and decomposition, Section 4.1
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Chapter 3