How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Canonical Roots, Signs, and Faithful Reflections — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Canonical Roots, Signs, and Faithful Reflections
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Coxeter Presentations, Exchange, and Reduced Word Theorems
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Products and Amalgamation
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Real Forms and Reflection Geometry
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Splitting Fields
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This companion is a dependency leaf: its examples use the theory of canonical-roots-signs-and-faithful-reflections, that page's prerequisite closure, and the free-product universal property from free-products-and-amalgamation, and no other page or item depends on them.
Roots, inversions and chamber images in , and infinite dihedral type computes the full rank-two data for : the positive roots, the inversion sets of the alternating words together with the complement formula and the explicit value of in , and the chamber geometry — six sectors with in , the ten sectors cut out by the five root lines with the wall-separation ranges in , and, for infinite dihedral type, the roots , along the null vector with the chambers realised as cones over the intervals of the affine line .
An indefinite Coxeter form with a faithful canonical reflection representation shows that an indefinite or degenerate Coxeter form does not obstruct faithfulness: for the all-infinite rank-three matrix the form has signature , and for the degenerate rank-two form its radical is ; the root-length criterion applies verbatim to both, while what fails in the degenerate case is only the identification of with through . A vector with mixed signs is not a root, while every root has a sign marks the exact scope of the sign theorem: the vector has mixed signs and -norm and so is not a root, although every element of the -orbit of the simple roots indeed has a sign; the comparison cases and are evaluated explicitly.
The results tested here are proved on the theory page: the rank-two chamber and length facts of The rank-two half-space alternative and the chamber-length induction , , the sign partition of Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots, the faithfulness of The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation, the inversion recursion of The geometric inversion set of an element of a Coxeter group and the inversion formula of The inversion formula , the root-reflection dictionary and strong exchange. The examples are evidence within their computed scope and do not replace those proofs.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Roots, inversions and chamber images in , and infinite dihedral type
Example
Let with , , and let be the Coxeter form with for and for , so that and (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps). Let be as on this page (The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone, Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots, The geometric inversion set of an element of a Coxeter group, The inversion formula , the root-reflection dictionary and strong exchange), and let denote the alternating word of letters. The following data are computed and verified.
(i) . and . For the six elements, each of cardinality . In the dual plane the three walls cut out six sectors, and the six chambers occur in the cyclic order , with ; explicitly separates from and from .
(ii) . , , and five roots, each of -norm one. With for , for and for one has , where is the alternating word of length beginning with ; for instance , of cardinality . The ten chambers are the sectors cut out by the five root lines; the chambers on the negative side of are exactly , and those on the negative side of are exactly .
(iii) . . Put ; then on , and is infinite. For every , of cardinalities and . The chambers are the cones over the intervals of the affine line , and the walls meet that line in the points and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a two-element set with , the space with basis vectors , the Coxeter form with constant ( for , for ), the presented Coxeter group with length function , the canonical reflection homomorphism with root system , the partition , the inversion sets of The geometric inversion set of an element of a Coxeter group, and the alternating words of letters beginning with .
and ; the reflection with normal , , is , so that , and , (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order).
is a homomorphism with , , so and ; the root system is , every root has -norm one, and is invariant under every ; moreover and with , and (The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone, Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections, Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots (1), (2)).
for ; ; and for , with one has , while for one has , where (The geometric inversion set of an element of a Coxeter group (1), (2)).
for every , and the map is a bijection from onto the reflection set (The inversion formula , the root-reflection dictionary and strong exchange (1), (2)).
In one has and, when , ; if the elements exhaust and ; if the elements are pairwise distinct with (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups, The rank-two half-space alternative and the chamber-length induction , (1)).
The dual action is , and if and only if and ; for every and one has if and only if . If , the chambers are exactly the sectors cut out by the root hyperplanes , with pairwise disjoint interiors; the corresponding closed sectors cover , while the open sectors cover its complement of the root lines. If , the chambers have pairwise disjoint interiors, the corresponding closed chambers have union , distinct chambers are separated by a root hyperplane, and the traces are exactly the integers in the coordinate on that affine line (The dual action, chambers, faces, and root hyperplanes, The dual action, the faces, and the rank-two chamber tiling (3), The rank-two half-space alternative and the chamber-length induction , (1), (4)).
Addition formulas: and ; and ; , and ; cosine is strictly decreasing on ; and is the smallest positive zero of cosine; every has a unique nonnegative square root , and ; a product of two real numbers is zero only if one factor is zero (The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine, Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
Verification
The case : the constant. Put , and . The addition formulas give and , hence ; since and , we get , that is . Now and cosine is strictly decreasing on with and , so ; hence and . Thus in this case , and the reflection formulas of [F1] give and .
The case : the chambers. By [F6] the ten chambers are exactly the ten sectors cut out by the five root lines. By [F5], together with gives and with indices modulo ; combined with this gives exactly for , and exactly for . By the shortening equivalence of [F6], the chambers on the negative side of are exactly and those on the negative side of exactly .
The case : the invariant functional direction. Here , so , and , where ; by bilinearity on . Moreover and , so for every , because is generated by and is a homomorphism.
The case : the positive roots. By 1.1, the three vectors , and are roots; they lie in , hence in , and they are pairwise distinct as functions on , with values , , . By [F6] the six chambers are cut out by the three root hyperplanes , ; the map from onto these lines is injective, because two roots on one line are proportional and both have -norm one by [F2], forcing the proportionality factor to be , and it is surjective because every equals with exactly one of in . Hence and .
The case : the chambers. Write and for , so that is described by the pair . By [F6], if and only if and . Using the products , , , from [F1] and 1.1, together with , , , , , (computed from ), this gives , , , , and . On each of these six sets the signs of are the six distinct patterns , , , , , ; these are exactly the six combinations not excluded by one of the three equations , , , so the six chambers are the six sectors, in the stated cyclic order. By [F5], and give and for all and , whence and with indices read modulo ; combined with this gives exactly for and exactly for . By the shortening equivalence of [F6], separates from and from .
The case : the constant. Put (the constant of the form at ) and . By 1.1, ; since and cosine is strictly decreasing on , we have . The double-angle formula gives , and since with , we get ; on the other hand . Hence , that is , and because we obtain , as and . Finally by expansion, so is one of the two numbers ; since gives , we conclude with , and then and .
The case : the positive roots. Put . First, : clearly , and for the identities and hold by 1.3, so induction on shows that every element of is a root; every element of has nonnegative coefficients in , so . Conversely, is stable under and : by 1.3 one has , which is for and for ; ; , which is for and for ; and . Since is generated by and is a homomorphism, is stable under every ; it contains , so it contains the orbit . Hence , and an element of lies in : it lies in , and no element of has all coefficients nonnegative, while the elements of do. Therefore ; finally the two families and are disjoint and each is injective in , because while evaluating at gives , and would give at and at , hence , a contradiction; so is infinite.
The case : the inversion sets. By [F5] the are pairwise distinct with , and , . We prove by induction on the two formulas and . For the first is and the second is . Assume the second formula for some . Since , the recursion of [F3] gives ; by 1.3, , so and therefore , which is the first formula with . Since , again, but with from 1.3, , the second formula with . So both formulas hold for all . Their elements are pairwise distinct because , so the two sets have cardinalities and , equal to and by [F5], in agreement with [F4].
The case : the inversion sets. By [F3] and 1.1, and since by [F5], one has , , , and , where we used and ; also . The cardinalities equal by [F5], as asserted.
The case : the positive roots. By 2.3 and [F1], and , and using and one computes . Hence the five vectors , , , and are roots; each lies in , so all five lie in , and they are pairwise distinct as functions on , with values , , , , . By [F6] the ten chambers are cut out by the five root hyperplanes , , and as in 2.1 the map is a bijection from onto these lines, so and the five listed vectors exhaust ; each of them has -norm one because it is a root, by [F2].
The case : the inversion sets , . By [F5], for , so each step below is a shortening-free step of the recursion of [F3] and the union is disjoint. Starting from and using the reflection values , , , , and (all from [F1], and ) one computes , , , and , the last equality by 3.2. This gives the displayed sets , of cardinalities as required by [F4].
The case : the inversion sets , . Since by 4.1, the reflection maps bijectively onto (as means , and induces a bijection of ); hence for : if and only if , because maps onto and onto . Comparing with the definition of this gives for every . For one has , where is the alternating word of length beginning with ; hence . In particular and, using the recursion of [F3] once more for (read with the roles of and exchanged, ), , so that , of cardinality .
The case : the chambers. Let for , so that ; since for all by 1.3, the value is preserved by the dual action: . On with coordinate , has trace . By [F1] and the dual action in [F6], acts by and by ; hence acts by translation . It follows that and for every integer . These are all intervals , and all group elements are alternating words by [F5] (cancelling adjacent equal letters); therefore these are exactly the open chamber traces, and no integer point belongs to one. Every chamber is a nonempty cone contained in , since this holds for and is invariant. Each chamber equals the cone over its trace, because for its normalisation lies in and with ; hence the chambers are exactly the cones over the intervals . Finally is the point with , and is the point with , because on . Together with 1.1-1.3, 2.1-2.5, 3.1-3.2, 4.1 and 5.1 this verifies all the claims of (i), (ii) and (iii).
An indefinite Coxeter form with a faithful canonical reflection representation
Example
Let and let be the Coxeter matrix with and for all distinct , so that the presentation has only the involutions and is the free product of three copies of (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups, The free product of an arbitrary family of groups). Let , the Coxeter form and the canonical reflection homomorphism (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone). Then:
(i) in the basis one has with eigenvalues ; hence is indefinite and nondegenerate with inertia and scalar signature in the convention of Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form. The positive/negative index pair is , also called the signature in the pair convention used by the companion page; is a proper cone;
(ii) nevertheless is faithful (The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation (3)), and its behaviour is governed by the sign criterion: , (consistent with ), (consistent with ), and , so ;
(iii) the degenerate rank-two case behaves the same way: for with one has , positive semidefinite of rank one with radical , and is still faithful, so neither indefiniteness nor degeneracy of obstructs faithfulness; what fails in the degenerate case is only the identification of with through (Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order (3)(ii)).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the three-element set with and for distinct , the space with basis , the Coxeter form , the canonical reflection homomorphism with root system , the positive cone , and the rank-two subspace .
Here for all distinct , so and for ; the reflection is for , giving , , , , and (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order).
is presented by , with universal property and length ; the alternating words of every length are reduced because , so , and (Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups, The rank-two block computation, exact dihedral orders, the signed reflection action, and ambient reducedness).
Root sign and length criterion: , , and for all , one has and ; moreover is injective (Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots, The root-length criterion and faithfulness of the canonical reflection representation).
An eigenvector is nonzero and satisfies ; a basis is an independent spanning family. A real symmetric form with a diagonal matrix having two positive entries, one negative entry and no zeros has inertia and scalar signature (Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces , and the spectrum of an endomorphism, Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis, Positive and negative definiteness, the inertia , rank , and signature of a real symmetric bilinear or quadratic form).
A free product of groups is characterized by its universal property: homomorphisms from the factors into any group extend uniquely to a homomorphism from the free product (The free product of an arbitrary family of groups).
Verification
The Gram matrix and inertia. By [F1], , where . Put , and in the coordinates . The coordinate matrix with columns has determinant , so they form a basis. Since and , the matrix has eigenvalues in this basis. Direct substitution into gives , , , and all three cross terms zero. Thus has diagonal matrix in this basis, so it is nondegenerate and indefinite with inertia , scalar signature , and positive/negative index pair . Finally is closed under addition and nonnegative scaling, contains no line because , and is not all of because . This is (i).
The signs of the computed roots. By [F2] one has , and , so and ; the length criterion [F3] therefore gives and . By [F1], , , and . The signs are consistent with the criterion also in the first two cases because , so says exactly that right multiplication by shortens .
A nontrivial image. By [F1], , so and . This differs from because its value at is while , so .
The degenerate rank-two case. Restrict to . By [F1] the Gram matrix of in is , and , so is positive semidefinite; its radical is , a line, so has rank one and in this two-generator case the map from to has nonzero kernel and is therefore not an identification of with ; this does not assert that the original nondegenerate rank-three form has a kernel.
The free-product assertion. For each , the relation defines a homomorphism sending the nonidentity element to . A homomorphism from into any group is uniquely determined by an element with . Since our Coxeter presentation has no finite off-diagonal relators, its universal property in [F2] gives exactly one homomorphism sending to for each . Therefore satisfies the free-product universal property [F5].
Faithfulness. The matrix is a Coxeter matrix on the finite set , so the homomorphism is injective by [F3]; this applies to and to the degenerate two-generator subcase as well, so in both cases is faithful even though is indefinite, respectively degenerate. With (i) from 1.1, (ii) from 1.2 and 1.3 together with [F3], and (iii) from 1.4, all clauses are verified: neither indefiniteness nor degeneracy of obstructs faithfulness.
A vector with mixed signs is not a root, while every root has a sign
Example
Let with , , the Coxeter form and the root system of the canonical reflection representation (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone). Then:
(i) the vector has coefficient at , so : it has mixed signs;
(ii) consequently , although it is nonzero and -non-isotropic, because by Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots (2) every root lies in or in ; explicitly while every root has -norm (Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections (3)), so fails both the sign test and the norm test;
(iii) for one has and the comparison case has and lies in ; for one has and still fails to be a root.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a two-element set with , the space with basis , the Coxeter form , the canonical reflection homomorphism , the root system and the positive cone .
and with equal to when and to when ; the reflection with normal is , so ; and with (The real Coxeter form, its radical, reflections, and form-preserving maps, The canonical reflection homomorphism, roots, reflections, and the positive cone).
Every root lies in or in , and not in both; every root satisfies ; (Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots, Descent of the reflection representation, unit root norms, and conjugation of reflections).
For every and every generator one has or , and if and only if ; moreover for the root (The rank-two half-space alternative and the chamber-length induction , , Root sign coherence and the action of simple reflections on positive roots).
The simple generators are distinct in , so , and ; moreover implies (Length parity, exchange, two-letter deletion, and faithfulness of the signed reflection action, Coxeter matrices, the presented Coxeter group, reduced words, length, and standard parabolic subgroups).
The addition formulas , hold for all real ; , and ; and ; cosine is strictly decreasing on ; and (The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine, Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine, Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine).
Every equals ; evaluating at and shows that these coordinates are unique (Reflections: involutivity, form invariance, fixed hyperplane, and exact rank-two order (1)).
Verification
Set-up. By [F1] the vector has coordinates and in the basis , and . The constant is positive: for , while for finite one has and cosine is strictly decreasing on with by [F5], so . Hence , so and is -non-isotropic.
The vector has mixed signs. By [F6] the coordinates of a vector in the basis are unique, so exactly when both coordinates of are and exactly when both coordinates are . Since has the coordinates and , it lies in neither cone: . This is (i).
The value . For with and , the addition formulas and of [F5] give and , hence . Applied to and combined with this gives , that is . Since by 1.1, the factor does not vanish, so and . Consequently , , and ; moreover .
is not a root. By [F2] every root lies in or in , and every root has -norm . By 1.2 the vector lies in neither cone, so it is not a root; independently, by 1.1 its -norm is , so it also fails the norm test for roots. This is (ii).
The comparison vector is positive. By [F3] applied to either or . In the second case by [F3], so and hence by [F4], which gives and contradicts ; therefore , and the equivalence of [F3] with gives . By 2.1, when , so with .
The cases and . If then by 2.1, so , and is a positive root of -norm by 3.1. If then by [F1], so , and by 2.2. With (i) from 1.2 and (ii) from 2.2, all three clauses are verified: the sign theorem applies to the -orbit of the simple roots, not to arbitrary vectors of .