How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Discrete Memoryless Channel Capacity — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Conditional Distributions and Regular Conditional Probability
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Convexity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Discrete Memoryless Channel Capacity
- F-Divergences, Rényi Information, and Hypothesis Testing
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability Spaces and Random Variables
- Finite-Alphabet Entropy and Divergence
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Quantum Communication and Fingerprinting
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These calculations apply the finite-DMC capacity formula to binary symmetric and binary erasure channels. They use natural logarithms and include the deterministic, fully erased, and fully noisy endpoints.
Average and maximal error can differ for a finite code. For one use of the BEC with erasure probability , send messages as and decode as , respectively, where denotes erasure. The two message error probabilities are and , so the uniform-message average error is while the maximal error is (Average and maximal error of a fixed-length code, Capacity of the binary erasure channel). In general, average error is at most maximal error; the expurgation lemma retains at least half the messages with maximal error at most twice the original average error (Expurgation converts small average error to small maximal error). These finite-code criteria nevertheless give the same asymptotic capacity: the A-page theorem proves for every finite DMC without a cost constraint (Operational capacity formula for a finite DMC).
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Capacity of the binary symmetric channel
Example
The binary symmetric channel has input and output alphabets ; independently at each use, the output is the input bit flipped with probability . Write The channel capacity is nats per use, attained by a uniform input.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The binary symmetric channel with crossover probability .
Finite discrete memoryless channels: the row assigns probability to and to .
Operational capacity formula for a finite DMC: capacity is the maximum of finite mutual information over input laws.
Finite conditional entropy and Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: conditional entropy is the finite weighted average of conditional pmf entropies, with .
Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws: for a binary law , , with equality exactly when .
Verification
Given: An input bit with and the specified channel.
The output law is Bernoulli with parameter . Each row has entropy , so [F3] and [F4] give .
By [F5], , so . Taking gives and equality. Therefore [F2] gives capacity . If or , and the channel is a deterministic bijection; if , every row is the same and the capacity is zero.
Capacity of the binary erasure channel
Example
The binary erasure channel outputs the input bit with probability and the erasure symbol with probability , independently at each use. For , its capacity is nats per use, attained by a uniform input.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A binary erasure channel with erasure probability and input law .
Finite discrete memoryless channels: conditional on , the output is with probability and with probability .
Operational capacity formula for a finite DMC: capacity is the maximum of finite mutual information over input laws.
Finite conditional entropy and Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: conditional entropy averages the entropy of each positive-mass conditional law; zero coordinates contribute .
Finite KL divergence is nonnegative with equality exactly at equal laws: for a binary law , , with equality at .
Verification
Given: and the independent erasure mechanism.
On the events and , is known exactly. The erasure indicator is independent of because [F1] gives the same conditional erasure probability for both input symbols. Hence on the conditional law of remains . By [F4], , and [F3] gives .
By [F5], , with equality at . Therefore the maximum mutual information is by [F2]. At the channel is noiseless and has capacity ; at its output is constant and the capacity is .