Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Graded Eilenberg-Watts respects bicategorical coherence

Statement

Let k be a field. Fix one uniformly definable family J as in clause 4 of Coherently shift-compatible functors and transformations form k-linear hom categories, containing the canonical tensor generators for every graded bimodule and all endpoint algebras. Here CohFun(A,B) means the actual word-coded category CohFunJ(A,B); its 1-cells are words interpreted as coherent functors, and composition is word concatenation. Any finite collection of separately supplied definable coherent functors can also be included in J.

  1. The graded Morita bicategory GrBimod has graded k-algebras as objects, graded (B,A)-bimodules as 1-cells A→B, degree-zero bimodule maps as 2-cells, composition (N,M)↦N⊗BM on 1-cells and g⊗f on 2-cells, regular bimodules as identity 1-cells, and the graded associators and unitors of Graded associativity, units, and internal-shift tensor isomorphisms as coherence isomorphisms; it is a bicategory in the sense of Bicategories, pseudofunctors, and biequivalences: the associators and unitors are degree-zero natural isomorphisms, they satisfy the pentagon and triangle identities because they are the ungraded coherence maps of The Morita data satisfy the bicategory coherence axioms read on graded modules, and horizontal composition is the functorial tensor product of bimodule maps with (g′⊗f′)(g⊗f)=(g′g)⊗(f′f) (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).

  2. The assignment Φ of Graded Eilenberg-Watts theorem with coherent shifts is a pseudofunctor from GrBimod to the bicategory whose objects are the graded k-algebras, whose hom-categories are the CohFun(A,B) of Coherently shift-compatible functors and transformations form k-linear hom categories, whose composition is composition of coherent functors with the composite comparison, and whose identity 1-cells are the identity functors with their canonical coherence: the composition comparison TN⊗BM≅TN∘TM is the graded associator of Graded associativity, units, and internal-shift tensor isomorphisms, the identity comparison id⇒TA is the inverse graded unitor, and the pseudofunctor coherence equations are transported from (1).

  3. Φ is a biequivalence: each local functor is an equivalence of categories by Graded bimodule maps classify shift-compatible transformations, and it is essentially surjective on 1-cells because every coherent functor is coherently isomorphic to TF(A) by Graded Eilenberg-Watts theorem with coherent shifts. Horizontal composition of coherent transformations corresponds to tensoring the underlying graded bimodule maps, (g⊗1)∗(f⊗1)=(g⊗f)⊗1 up to the canonical comparison, so the equivariance restriction on 2-cells of Coherently shift-compatible functors and natural transformations is preserved by the bicategorical structure. No commutativity beyond k, no choice and no enhancement data are introduced.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k; graded k-algebras A,B,C,D,E; graded bimodules F of type (B,A), G of type (C,B), H of type (D,C); degree-zero bimodule maps f:M→M′, g:N→N′, g′:N′→N′′, f′:M′→M′′; and graded left A-modules X.

[L1]

The functor Φ(M)=(TM,θM), Φ(f)=f⊗1, is an equivalence of categories and the map η↦ηA is a bijection with inverse f↦f⊗1 (Graded Eilenberg-Watts theorem with coherent shifts, Graded bimodule maps classify shift-compatible transformations).

[L2]

For this specified family J, words representing k-linear right exact coproduct-preserving coherent functors and their set-coded coherent transformations form locally small k-linear hom-categories with composite comparisons, identities and composition (Coherently shift-compatible functors and transformations form k-linear hom categories).

[L3]

Φ is essentially surjective up to coherent natural isomorphism: every coherent functor is coherently isomorphic to TF(A) (Graded Eilenberg-Watts theorem with coherent shifts).

[L4]

The graded associator αH,G,F:(H⊗CG)⊗BF→H⊗C(G⊗BF) and the graded unitors B⊗BF≅F, F⊗AA≅F are degree-zero natural isomorphisms compatible with outer actions (Graded associativity, units, and internal-shift tensor isomorphisms).

[L5]

The graded balanced tensor product is graded by total internal degree on elementary tensors, and its outer actions make it a graded bimodule (Graded balanced tensor product and homogeneous Hom).

[L6]

The ungraded balanced associator is a canonical natural isomorphism respecting outer actions (Associativity of tensor products for compatible bimodules).

[L7]

The ungraded tensor-unit maps R⊗RN→N and M⊗RR→M are natural isomorphisms respecting outer module structures (The regular module is a tensor unit: R⊗RN≅N and M⊗RR≅M).

[L8]

For module maps g,g′ and f,f′ the tensor product is functorial: (g′∘g)⊗(f′∘f)=(g′⊗f′)∘(g⊗f) and id⁡⊗id⁡=id⁡ (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).

[L9]

Horizontal and vertical composition of natural transformations satisfy the interchange law (Horizontal and vertical composition of natural transformations satisfy the interchange law).

[L10]

A bicategory has hom-categories, identity 1-cells, composition functors and invertible associators and unitors satisfying the pentagon and triangle identities; a pseudofunctor carries composition and identity comparisons satisfying the pseudofunctor coherence equations; a biequivalence has local equivalences and is essentially surjective on objects (Bicategories, pseudofunctors, and biequivalences).

[L11]

The data of the ungraded Morita bicategory satisfy the bicategory axioms: the associators and unitors are natural isomorphisms, the pentagon and triangle identities hold, and (g,f)↦g⊗f is a functor on hom-categories preserving identities and composition, with all coherence identities checked on elementary tensors (The Morita data satisfy the bicategory coherence axioms).

[L12]

Coherent transformations satisfy the equivariance square for the comparisons of their source and target functors (Coherently shift-compatible functors and natural transformations).

[L13]

Graded bimodules, degree-zero maps and the graded tensor product are the conventions of the graded bimodule page, where the internal grading multiplies no sign (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L4L5L6L7L8L10L11L13

The graded Morita data form a bicategory [L10]: for graded bimodules the tensor product is a graded bimodule by [L5] and composition N⊗BM is associative with the degree-zero natural associators and unitors of [L4] and [L6, L7]; on 2-cells the assignment (g,f)↦g⊗f is functorial by [L8], which gives the composition functors and the identity conditions (g′⊗f′)(g⊗f)=(g′g)⊗(f′f); the pentagon and triangle identities for the graded associators and unitors hold because the graded balanced tensor is the ordinary balanced tensor with the induced internal grading and the coherence maps are the same underlying maps as those of [L11], whose identities were verified on elementary tensors, and every graded tensor is a finite sum of elementary tensors [L5]; no sign enters the coherence maps [L13].

2.1step 1.1L1L2L4L5L9L10

By [L2], finite words give actual set objects, concatenation gives strictly associative composition, and the empty word gives the identity. The tensor generator for each bimodule is present in J, so the realization satisfies [L1]. The assignment Φ is a pseudofunctor [L10]: it is the identity on objects, its local functors M↦(TM,θM), f↦f⊗1 are functorial and k-linear by the local equivalence [L1], the composition comparison has components the degree-zero natural isomorphisms N⊗B(M⊗AX)→(N⊗BM)⊗AX inverse to the graded associators of [L4] and the identity comparison id⇒TA has components x↦1A⊗x, inverse to the unitor isomorphisms of [L4]; these comparisons are coherent because they are the identity on elementary tensors under the total grading [L5], so the pseudofunctor coherence equations become the pentagon and unit triangle identities of step 1.1 applied at a variable module, and the interchange needed on 2-cells is [L9].

3.1step 2.1L4L8L12

For degree-zero bimodule maps f:M→M′ and g:N→N′ the horizontal composite (g⊗1)∗(f⊗1) has components n⊗(m⊗x)↦g(n)⊗(f(m)⊗x), and under the associators of [L4] this corresponds to (g⊗f)(n⊗m)⊗x, that is, to the components of (g⊗f)⊗1; hence horizontal composition of the coherent transformations of Φ is the tensor product of the underlying bimodule maps up to the canonical comparison, and the equivariance restriction of [L12] is preserved.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1L1L3L10

The pseudofunctor Φ is a biequivalence [L10]: each local functor is an equivalence of categories by [L1], and on 1-cells it is essentially surjective because every coherent functor is coherently isomorphic to TF(A) by [L3]; it is the identity on objects, so essential surjectivity on objects is immediate.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

Collecting steps 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2: the graded Morita data form a bicategory, Φ is a pseudofunctor that is a biequivalence, horizontal composition of coherent transformations corresponds to tensoring the underlying graded bimodule maps, and the equivariance restriction on 2-cells is preserved; all coherence maps are the canonical associators and unitors, no commutativity beyond the central field k is used, no enhancement data are introduced, and no choice is made.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources