Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

There is a Lebesgue measurable subset of R that is not Borel

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Then there exists a Lebesgue measurable subset of R that is not a Borel set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice.

[L1]

Every subset of R of positive Lebesgue outer measure contains a nonmeasurable subset (Every subset of R of positive Lebesgue outer measure contains a nonmeasurable subset).

[L2]

The image K=ψ[C] of the Cantor set under ψ(x)=x+c(x) is compact and has Lebesgue measure 1 (The homeomorphism x↦x+c(x) sends the Cantor set onto a compact set of Lebesgue measure 1).

[L3]

The Cantor set is Lebesgue measurable with measure 0 (The Cantor set is an uncountable subset of R of Lebesgue measure zero).

[L5]

The Borel sigma-algebra of a subspace is the trace of the ambient Borel sigma-algebra (The Borel sigma-algebra of a subspace is the trace of the ambient Borel sigma-algebra).

[L6]

Continuous preimages of Borel sets are Borel (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets).

[L7]

Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of R is Lebesgue measurable (Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable).

[L8]

ψ is a homeomorphism from [0,1] onto [0,2] (The map x↦x+c(x) is a homeomorphism from [0,1] onto [0,2]).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2choose

By [L2] the compact set K has positive outer measure, so [L1] supplies a nonmeasurable subset N⊆K.

2.1step 1.1L3L4L8

Let E:=ψ−1[N]⊆C. Since C is measurable of measure 0 by [L3], completeness [L4] makes E Lebesgue measurable.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2L5L6L7L8∎

If E were Borel in R, then [L5] would make E Borel as a subset of the subspace C. The inverse homeomorphism ψ−1∣K:K→C is continuous by [L8], so [L6] would make N=(ψ−1∣K)−1[E] Borel in the subspace K. Applying [L5] again, there would be a Borel set B⊆R with N=K∩B. Now [L7] makes B Lebesgue measurable, [L2] makes K Lebesgue measurable, and measurable sets are closed under intersection; hence N would be Lebesgue measurable, contradicting step 1.1. Therefore E is not Borel.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources