How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coinvariant functors and the transition maps
Definition
A graded -module consists of -modules , , together with -linear maps for all . A morphism of graded -modules is a family of -linear maps with for all .
Fix , a set of cardinality , and a functorial disjoint union of finite sets. Let be an FI-module over (The category FI and FI-modules over a commutative ring) and let . Put
the coinvariants of the -module : the quotient by the span of the elements , , (The coinvariants functor, Quotient module with scalar multiplication on additive cosets). Equivalently , the two descriptions being identified by the balancing argument of The tensor product from the additive group underlying the free -module on , elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums and the corresponding identification for in The coinvariants functor; the group ring is a unital -algebra with basis the group elements (The group ring of finitely supported formal -linear combinations of group elements, The group ring is a unital -algebra with basis , and each is a unit of ).
To define the transition map , choose an injection . It induces the injection and hence a -linear map . This map is -equivariant, where acts on the target through the injection , so it descends to the quotient map on coinvariants. The map is independent of : for two injections the composite is a bijection , which extends along the complement to a permutation with ; then , and the map induced by on is the identity because it comes from the action of the group element . Thus is well defined and is a graded -module.
A map of FI-modules gives -linear maps commuting with the -actions and with the maps induced by , hence maps of coinvariants commuting with ; so is a functor from FI-modules over to graded -modules.
Permutations of commute with the moving-block action of , so also carries an -action. Since commutes with these permutations, every is -equivariant. Naturality has the same equivariance.
Exactness. Coinvariants of a group module are right exact (The coinvariants functor is right exact), so the functor is right exact and each is right exact in every degree. If contains , then exists in and the averaging map , , is a well-defined -linear section of the quotient map that is natural in ; it identifies with the invariants . Under this natural identification becomes the invariants functor, which is left exact (kernels of equivariant maps are computed pointwise), and therefore is exact; in that case the induced map is injective for every sub-FI-module (Submodule of a module, Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel), so is identified with a submodule of . Finite averaging uses only the finite groups ; no choice principle is used.
Depends on
- The category FI and FI-modules over a commutative ring
- The coinvariants functor
- Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel
- Submodule of a module
- Quotient module $M/N$ with scalar multiplication on additive cosets
- The tensor product $M\otimes_R N$ from the additive group underlying the free $\mathbb Z$-module on $M\times N$, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums
- The coinvariants functor is right exact
- The group ring $R[G]$ of finitely supported formal $R$-linear combinations of group elements
- The group ring $R[G]$ is a unital $R$-algebra with basis $G$, and each $g\in G$ is a unit of $R[G]$
Used by
- Injectivity, surjectivity and stability degree Definition
- Bounded generation degree bounds surjectivity degree and weight Lemma
- Coinvariants detect vanishing of subquotients of bounded weight, and padded irreducibles stabilise Lemma
- Free FI-modules have computable stability degree and weight Lemma
- A stability degree bounds the first row of every padding tail Proposition
- Each padded irreducible family is realised by a finitely generated FI-module Proposition
- Weight and stability degree give a uniform representation-stability range Proposition
- FI-modules over a Noetherian ℚ-algebra form a Noetherian category Theorem
- Finite generation is equivalent to uniform representation stability Theorem
- Finitely generated FI-modules have eventual character polynomials Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas Church, Jordan S. Ellenberg and Benson Farb, “FI-modules and stability for representations of symmetric groups”, arXiv:1204.4533v4 (2014); published in Duke Math. J. 164 (2015) 1833–1910 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas Church, Jordan S. Ellenberg, Benson Farb and Rohit Nagpal, “FI-modules over Noetherian rings”, Geom. Topol. 18 (2014) 2951–2984; author-hosted full text (standard reference, not scraped)