Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Borel cross-sections for closed subgroups of second-countable locally compact Hausdorff groups

Statement

Assume AC. Let G be a second-countable locally compact Hausdorff topological group, H≤G a closed subgroup, and q:G→G/H the quotient map. Then there is a Borel cross-section s:G/H→G with q∘s=idG/H, and for every g∈G there is a unique h(g,x)∈H with g s(x)=s(gx) h(g,x), where x∈G/H; the map (g,x)↦h(g,x) is Borel into H. Consequently the map G→G/H×H, g↦(q(g),s(q(g))−1g), is a Borel isomorphism onto G/H×H, and the quasi-invariant measure class on G/H may be transported to a σ-finite measure on G along s.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a second-countable LCH group G, a closed subgroup H≤G, and the quotient map q:G→G/H.

[F1]

G and G/H are Polish, q is continuous and open, and G/H is locally compact Hausdorff (Second-countable locally compact Hausdorff spaces are Polish, and homogeneous quotients are standard Borel, Compact lifts and averaging onto C_c(G/H)).

[F4]

By [F1], G and G/H are Polish and hence standard Borel; their Borel structures are generated by their open sets (Standard Borel spaces, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space).

[F5]

The quotient map satisfies q(gs)=gq(s) for all g,s∈G, and H={g:q(g)=eH} is the stabilizer of the identity coset; multiplication and inversion of G are continuous, so composites of Borel maps with the group operations are Borel (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space).

Proof

technique · construct

Given: AC, the second-countable LCH group G, the closed subgroup H, and the quotient map q.

1.1F2F3F6

Fix a compatible complete metric d on G by [F2]. By second countability and [F3], choose a countable base (Vk)k∈N of relatively compact open sets such that for every open U⊆G, every g∈U, and every ϵ>0 there is a Vk with g∈Vk⊆Vk‾⊆U and diam⁡Vk<ϵ: for each basic open set and each positive integer m, the refinements supplied by [F3] cover that basic open set, and second countability gives a countable subcover. By [F6] choose a point ck∈Vk for every k.

1.2F3F1F5

For x∈G/H define indices kn(x) by recursion: k0(x) is the least k with x∈q(Vk) and diam⁡Vk≤1; such an index exists by choosing any g∈q−1(x) and applying [F3] inside G. Having defined kn(x), let kn+1(x) be the least k with Vk‾⊆Vkn(x), x∈q(Vk), and diam⁡Vk≤2−(n+1). This index exists by choosing g∈q−1(x)∩Vkn(x) and applying [F3] inside Vkn(x) with the prescribed diameter. Each kn is Borel: for n=0 each candidate condition on x is membership in the open set q(Vk), and inductively the set of x with Vk‾⊆Vkn(x) is the union over countably many j with Vk‾⊆Vj of {x:kn(x)=j}; intersecting with q(Vk) and the fixed diameter condition gives Borel candidate sets. Selecting the least index in a Borel family is Borel.

2.1F2step 1.2

The points pn(x):=ckn(x) are Borel functions of x and converge: for m≥n, pm(x)∈Vkm(x)⊆Vkn(x)‾, so d(pm(x),pn(x))≤diam⁡Vkn(x)‾≤2−n. Completeness gives a limit s(x)∈⋂nVkn(x)‾, whose diameter is zero. The map s is Borel: for each nonempty closed F⊆G, s(x)∈F iff d(pn(x),F)→0; this condition is a countable intersection of countable unions of Borel sets because pn is Borel and distance to F is continuous. The empty closed set has empty preimage.

3.1step 1.2F1F2F6step 2.1

s is a cross-section: for each n choose gn∈Vkn(x) with q(gn)=x, which is possible because x∈q(Vkn(x)) by [step 1.2]. Both gn and s(x) lie in Vkn(x)‾, a set of diameter at most 2−n, so d(gn,s(x))≤2−n→0 and the sequence gn converges to s(x); continuity of q gives x=q(gn)→q(s(x)), and since the left-hand sequence is constant, q(s(x))=x.

4.1F1F4step 2.1step 3.1

Transport of measures: for a σ-finite Borel measure μ on G/H, define ν(E):=μ(s−1(E)) for Borel E⊆G. This is a Borel measure because s is Borel. It is carried by the Borel image s(G/H)={g∈G:s(q(g))=g}: the latter is Borel since g↦(s(q(g)),g) is Borel and the diagonal of the Polish space G is closed. If G/H=⋃nAn with μ(An)<∞, then s(An)=s(G/H)∩q−1(An) is Borel and ν(s(An))=μ(An), since q∘s=id. The sets s(An) together with G∖s(G/H) cover G, and the last set has ν-measure zero, so ν is σ-finite. Equivalent measures have equivalent pushforwards by the definition of ν, so the measure class is transported along s.

4.2step 3.1F5

For g∈G and x∈G/H one has q(gs(x))=gq(s(x))=gx=q(s(gx)) by [step 3.1], so s(gx)−1gs(x)∈q−1(eH)=H. Thus h(g,x)=s(gx)−1gs(x) is the unique element of H with gs(x)=s(gx)h(g,x). The map (g,x)↦h(g,x) is Borel as a composite of the Borel map (g,x)↦s(gx) (composition of s with the continuous action map) with the continuous group operations.

4.3F5step 3.1

The map Φ:G→G/H×H, g↦(q(g),s(q(g))−1g), is Borel and so is Ψ:G/H×H→G, (x,h)↦s(x)h; they are mutually inverse: q(s(x)h)=q(s(x))=x and s(x)−1s(x)h=h, while s(q(g))(s(q(g))−1g)=g. Hence Φ is a Borel isomorphism onto G/H×H.

5.1step 3.1step 4.2step 4.3step 4.1step 1.1∎

We have constructed a Borel cross-section s of q [step 3.1], the unique Borel section cocycle h(g,x)=s(gx)−1gs(x) [step 4.2], the Borel isomorphism G≅G/H×H [step 4.3], and the transported σ-finite measure [step 4.1]. AC is inherited through the Polish-space input [F1], whose complete-metrization proof uses DC and the ultrafilter lemma, and supplies Countable Choice for the countable-base refinements and base points ck in step 1.1 and the fibre points gn in step 3.1. The least-index recursion and the Borel cocycle and product formulas add no choice requirement.

Remarks

The section is constructed from a countable base by a deterministic least-index recursion, so its Borelness is proved rather than assumed; the compatibility of the presented metric with the group topology is the only metric input.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources