Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An automorphism of the completed local ring matching two tangent directions preserves the homogenization

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice) and char⁡K=0 (Field).

Let (I,E,μ) be a marked ideal of maximal order on the smooth K-scheme X and let u,v∈T(I,μ)x=Dμ−1(I)x be tangent directions at x∈supp⁡(I,E,μ) that are transversal to E (Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors). Then there is an automorphism φ^uv of the completed local scheme X^x:=Spec⁡O^X,x (The I-adic completion of a module, Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field) such that: (1) φ^uv∗(HI^x)=(HI^x); (2) φ^uv∗(E)=E; (3) φ^uv∗(u)=v; (4) the formal support, defined here as supp⁡(I^,μ):=V(T(I)R) is contained in the fixed-point set of φ^uv.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume char⁡K=0. Let (I,E,μ) be a marked ideal of maximal order on the smooth K-scheme X, let x∈supp⁡(I,E,μ), let u,v∈T(I,μ)x=Dμ−1(I)x be tangent directions transversal to E, and let R=O^X,x with X^x=Spec⁡R.

[F1]

Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors, embedding dimension and regular local ring: T(I)=Dμ−1(I); u,v∈T(I)x have multiplicity one; since X is smooth at x the local ring is regular and u,v are each part of a regular system of parameters; transversality to E means the parameters can be chosen compatible with the local equations of the members of E through x.

[F2]

Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field, completion preserves regular local rings: R is a Noetherian regular local ring, faithful flat over OX,x, with maximal ideal mR; I^=IR, and the completed tangent ideal is T^=T(I)R.

[F3]

The homogenized ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order: H(I)=∑i=0μ−1Di(I)T(I)i, so its completion is H(I)^=∑iDi(I)^ T^ i.

[F4]

Field, Derivation of an algebra, Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal: Write Di(I)^=Di(I)R; formal parameter derivatives fixing the coefficient field send this completed ideal into Di+1(I)R. To justify this, restrict a formal parameter derivation to OX,x. It is a K-derivation into R, and the finite-free differential module identifies it with an R-linear combination of the algebraic K-derivations (Differentials of a smooth morphism, Derivations are maps out of Ω). Leibniz also differentiates the multiplying coefficients in R, giving terms already in the lower derivative ideal. This supplies the Taylor containment without identifying the full algebraic differential module of a power-series ring with a finite module. In characteristic zero, for a continuous coordinate substitution uj↦uj+δj with all δj in an ideal T, formal Taylor expansion gives φ∗(f)=∑α∈Nn1α!(∂αf) δα, convergently in the maximal-adic topology; if f∈Di(I), then ∂αf∈Di+∣α∣(I).

[F5]

Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position, Marked ideals of maximal order, tangent directions and transversality to the exceptional divisors: the local equations of the components of E through x span a subspace W⊆m/m2. Transversality says that each of u and v is independent of W, so the boundary equations together with either direction can be completed separately to a regular system of parameters; no common complementary parameters are asserted.

[F6]

Transcendental residue elements adjoin across a maximal subfield, Separable residue elements adjoin across a maximal subfield, A complete equicharacteristic Noetherian local ring is a power-series quotient, regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: R is a complete equicharacteristic regular local ring, and smoothness in characteristic zero makes κ(x)/K a finitely generated separably generated extension. Starting from the image of K in R, lift a separating transcendence basis and then the finite separable algebraic generators by these field-adjunction lemmas; this gives a coefficient field k⊂R containing K. The continuous parameter map k⟦U1,…,Un⟧→R is surjective by the Cohen presentation. Its kernel is zero: the regular-local associated-graded theorem identifies the graded map on the parameter classes with an isomorphism, and a nonzero series in the kernel would have a least nonzero homogeneous term mapping to zero, a contradiction. Thus any regular parameter system identifies R with a formal power-series ring, where substitution by another parameter system with invertible cotangent matrix is a continuous K-algebra automorphism.

Proof

1.1F1F5F6

Construction of the automorphism. Put V=m/m2, let U be the image of T in V, and let W⊆V be spanned by the local equations of the components of E through x. The classes uˉ,vˉ lie in U∖W. Choose a decomposition V=U⊕C with W=(W∩U)⊕WC, and choose AU∈GL⁡(U) fixing W∩U pointwise and sending uˉ to vˉ; this is possible because both classes are nonzero modulo W∩U. Then A=AU⊕idC fixes W pointwise and (A−id)(V)⊆U. Choose a regular system of parameters u=u1,u2,…,un with the boundary equations among u2,…,un. Set v1=v; keep each boundary parameter unchanged; for every other j choose δj∈T lifting A(uˉj)−uˉj and put vj=uj+δj. Then v1,…,vn is a regular system of parameters, each δj∈T, and all boundary equations are fixed. By [F6], substitution uj↦vj defines a continuous K-algebra automorphism φ^uv of R. It sends u to v, preserves E, and induces the identity on R/T. This proves (2), (3), and the congruence used below.

1.2F3F4

The homogenization is preserved. The substitution induces the identity modulo T^, so it sends T^ into itself. This inclusion is an equality: the ascending chain T^⊆φ^−1(T^)⊆φ^−2(T^)⊆⋯ stabilizes in the Noetherian ring R, and applying a suitable power of φ^ gives φ^(T^)=T^. For f∈Di(I)R and t∈T^ i, the degree-s Taylor terms of φ^(f) lie in Di+s(I)R T^ s by [F4]. Multiplication by φ^(t)∈T^ i puts them in Di+s(I)R T^ i+s. If i+s<μ, this is a summand of H(I)R; otherwise it lies in T^ μ, the last retained summand. The ideal H(I)R is closed in the maximal-adic topology, since completion of a finite quotient is the quotient of the completion (Completion commutes with finite quotients and induced submodules). Thus the convergent Taylor sum stays in H(I)R, proving φ^(H)⊆H. Its inverse also induces the identity modulo T^ and has every coordinate increment in T^; the same argument gives φ^−1(H)⊆H. Applying φ^ to this inclusion proves the reverse containment, hence (1).

2.1F1F2F6∎

Fixed points on the support. Every coordinate increment δj lies in T^, and the automorphism fixes the coefficient field. Thus for every prime p⊇T^, it induces the identity on R/p; every point of V(T^)=supp⁡(I^,μ) is fixed. This is assertion (4).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources