Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite epsilon nets of the Euclidean sphere

Statement

Let d≥1 be an integer and 0<ϵ<1. There is a finite set N⊆Sd−1 such that every u∈Sd−1 has some v∈N with ∥u−v∥2≤ϵ, and ∣N∣≤(1+2/ϵ)d. Here Sd−1={u∈Rd:∥u∥2=1} by Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn. Such a set is called an ϵ-net of the sphere.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer d≥1 and 0<ϵ<1.

[F1]

The closed Euclidean ball and sphere are B‾2(c,r)={x:∥x−c∥2≤r} and S2(c,r)={x:∥x−c∥2=r}; the unit sphere is Sd−1=S2(0,1) (Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn).

[F2]

d2(x,y)=∥x−y∥2 is a metric, so it satisfies the triangle inequality (Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it).

[F3]

Closed Euclidean balls are Jordan measurable, with V1(r)=2r and the stated slicing recursion for Vd(r) (Closed Euclidean balls are Jordan measurable and their volumes satisfy the slicing recursion).

[F4]

An invertible linear map scales Jordan content by the absolute determinant; in particular cont⁡(rB‾2(0,1))=rdcont⁡(B‾2(0,1)) for r>0 (A linear endomorphism of Rn sends bounded Jordan sets to bounded Jordan sets and scales their content by the absolute determinant).

[F6]

Jordan content is additive on finite disjoint families of bounded Jordan sets (Jordan content is finitely additive when the overlap has content zero).

[F7]

Jordan outer content is the infimum of volumes of finite rectangle covers, and the content of a Jordan set is its common inner/outer value (Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm).

[F8]

The natural numbers are unbounded in R (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

[F9]

Every nonempty finite set of real numbers has a maximum (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum).

[F10]

For rational α>0, rational powers preserve order on positive bases, and 0α=0 (Monotonicity of r↦ar and of a↦ar, Rational powers ar of a positive base).

[F11]

The Riemann integral is monotone and additive across a cut, and the integral of a constant c on an interval [a,b] is c(b−a) (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm, The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm).

Proof

1.1givenF3F10F11algebra

Put Vd=cont⁡(B‾2(0,1)). This number is finite by [F3] and positive by induction on d: V1=2, and for d≥2 set α=(d−1)/2>0. On [−1/2,1/2], 1−t2≥3/4, so [F10] gives (1−t2)α≥(3/4)α>0; on all of [−1,1] this integrand is nonnegative. By [F11], splitting the integral at −1/2 and 1/2 and comparing the middle part with the constant (3/4)α shows ∫−11(1−t2)α dt≥(3/4)α>0. The volume recursion [F3] then gives Vd>0 from Vd−1>0.

1.2givenF1F2

Let E={x1,…,xN}⊆Sd−1 have pairwise distances greater than ϵ, and put r=ϵ/2. The closed balls B‾2(xj,r) are pairwise disjoint: a point in two of them would, by the triangle inequality [F2], put the corresponding centers at distance at most 2r=ϵ, contrary to the separation. Each small ball lies in B‾2(0,1+r), since ∥xj∥2=1 and [F2] gives ∥y∥2≤∥y−xj∥2+∥xj∥2≤r+1.

2.1F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 1.2algebra

By scaling and translation invariance [F4, F5], every small ball in step 1.2 has content rdVd and the large ball has content (1+r)dVd. Finite additivity [F6] and monotonicity of outer content from [F7] give NrdVd≤(1+r)dVd. Step 1.1 gives Vd>0, so cancellation and r=ϵ/2 yield N≤((1+r)/r)d=(1+2/ϵ)d. This also holds when E is empty, for which N=0.

3.1givenF1F8F9step 2.1choose

Choose an integer M>(1+2/ϵ)d using [F8]. Let K be the set of cardinalities of finite subsets of Sd−1 whose distinct points are more than ϵ apart. The first coordinate unit vector shows K is nonempty, and step 2.1 shows every member of K is at most (1+2/ϵ)d<M. Thus K is a nonempty subset of {0,1,…,M}; [F9] gives a largest member k∈K, attained by a finite set N by the definition of K.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1contradiction∎

If some u∈Sd−1 were farther than ϵ from every point of N, adjoining u would produce a finite set with pairwise distances greater than ϵ and cardinality k+1, contradicting maximality in step 3.1. Thus N is an ϵ-net; step 2.1 gives its stated cardinality bound. This construction uses only a maximum in a finite set of possible cardinalities, not an axiom of choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

81 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources