How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Degreewise direct sums and homogeneous free covers in graded modules
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and a graded -algebra (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts).
-
For every family of graded left -modules the degreewise direct sum, defined by with componentwise action, is a graded left -module and is the coproduct of the family in : the coordinate inclusions are degree-zero -linear and every family of degree-zero -linear maps assembles to a unique degree-zero -linear map . In particular has all small coproducts, computed degreewise and agreeing with the finite biproducts of Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category; for the coproduct is the zero module. No choice is used.
-
For every the shifted regular module is free on the homogeneous generator : for every graded left -module and every there is a unique degree-zero -linear map with , namely .
-
Consequently every graded left -module has a canonical homogeneous free cover: let be the set of nonzero homogeneous elements of , so that each has a unique degree with , and put The degree-zero -linear map is an epimorphism, its kernel is a graded submodule and hence a graded left -module, and applying the same construction to gives an exact sequence in whose first map is not asserted to be monic. The cover is indexed by the actual nonzero homogeneous elements of , so no generator, basis or resolution is chosen.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a graded -algebra , a family of graded left -modules, a graded left -module , an integer and an element .
Graded -algebras, graded modules with and , degree-zero maps, graded submodules with pieces , and the internal shift are defined in Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts.
The direct sum of a family of left modules is the submodule of the product consisting of the finitely supported families, it carries the coordinate inclusions , and for the empty index set both the product and the direct sum are the zero module (The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).
A family of homomorphisms out of the summands of a direct sum has a unique assembly with , given by (Universal property of a direct sum of modules).
For a unital ring and a set the free left -module on is , with standard basis inclusion , and a family is a basis when every element is uniquely a finite -linear combination of the (The free module on a set and its standard basis).
Every set map into a left -module extends uniquely to an -module homomorphism with (Universal property of the free module on a set).
In kernels, images, cokernels and finite biproducts are computed in each homogeneous degree: for a degree-zero one has and , the binary biproduct is the graded module with pieces , exactness is equivalent to exactness degreewise, and the category is abelian (Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category).
For a module homomorphism its kernel is and its image is , and the cokernel is the quotient by the image (Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).
An abelian category is an additive category, that is, a preadditive category with all finite biproducts, in which every morphism has a kernel and a cokernel and the canonical comparison from the coimage to the image is an isomorphism (Abelian category).
Proof
Give the direct sum of the underlying left -modules its componentwise action ; this is a left -module structure preserving finite supports, and with one has : every element of is a finite sum of elements of the subgroups , and if with then in each coordinate with , so for all by the directness of each .
The shifted regular module has the same underlying left -module as , which is free on the single standard basis element , and a left -module map out of it is uniquely determined by the image of ; for every the map sends into because , so it is degree-zero -linear with , and every degree-zero -linear with satisfies .
Every family of degree-zero -linear maps assembles by [L3] to the unique -linear with , namely ; it is degree-zero because for all components satisfy , whence and , and it is the unique degree-zero -linear map with the prescribed composites, so is the coproduct of the family.
Since for all , the componentwise action satisfies , so is a graded left -module; the coordinate inclusion maps into , so it is degree-zero -linear.
For the direct sum is the zero module by [L2], and the unique map from a zero module to is -linear and degree-zero, so the zero module is initial and is the coproduct of the empty family; together with step 2.1 this shows that the degreewise direct sum is the coproduct of every family, so has all small coproducts.
Suppose is finite. Then is also the product of the family: given degree-zero -linear maps , the elementwise map has finite support in , is -linear and degree-zero, and is the unique such map with for the coordinate projections ; for two summands has pieces with the same coordinate inclusions and projections as the binary biproduct of [L6], and the finite case follows by iterating that identification, so the coproducts here agree with the finite biproducts computed in [L6].
Let be the set of nonzero homogeneous elements of ; each has a unique degree with , since with and would exhibit as two different finite decompositions of one element. Hence is a graded left -module by steps 1.1 and 2.2, and by step 2.1 and step 1.2 the maps assemble to the unique degree-zero -linear with for each .
The map is surjective, hence an epimorphism: every is the finite sum of its nonzero homogeneous components , and ; and two degree-zero -linear maps out of agreeing after composition with a surjection agree everywhere.
The kernel is by [L6], hence a graded submodule of and therefore a graded left -module with pieces ; applying the construction of steps 3.3 and 4.1 to produces and a degree-zero -linear epimorphism , whose composite with the inclusion is degree-zero -linear with image .
Therefore while by step 4.1, so the sequence is exact at and at ; the map is not asserted monic, the indexing set and the degrees are determined by , and the direct sums are indexed by those elements, so no generator, basis, resolution or other choice is made.
Depends on
- Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts
- The direct sum of an indexed family of modules
- Universal property of a direct sum of modules
- The free module on a set and its standard basis
- Universal property of the free module on a set
- Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category
- Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel
- Abelian category
Used by
- The degree-zero projection is exact and cocontinuous but not a graded tensor functor Counterexample
- Coherently shift-compatible functors and transformations form k-linear hom categories Lemma
- Colimits of a graded additive functor equal right exactness plus coproduct preservation Lemma
- Graded tensor functors are k-linear, right exact, coproduct preserving and shift-coherent Lemma
- Homogeneous free presentations prove the graded comparison is an isomorphism Lemma
- Internal shifts are autoequivalences and commute with the graded tensor product Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Roozbeh Hazrat, Graded Rings and Graded Grothendieck Groups (arXiv:1405.5071), §1.2.2 shift of modules (1.16), printed p.34; §1.2.6 graded tensor product (1.21)-(1.23), printed pp.40-41; §2.3 Definitions 2.3.3-2.3.4, Theorem 2.3.7 with its proof, Theorem 2.3.8, Example 2.3.9, printed pp.118-123 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation Theory of Symmetric Groups and Related Hecke Algebras (arXiv:0909.4844), §2.2 'Graded representation theory', printed pp.6-8 (standard reference, not scraped)