Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The fifth stable offset in integral Eilenberg–Mac Lane homology vanishes

Statement

Assume AC. For every integer n≥8 and any CW model K(Z,n), Hn+5(K(Z,n);Z)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and marked CW models Km=K(Z,m).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the cohomology, fibration and CW suppliers.

[F1]

Circle and path-loop models for Eilenberg–Mac Lane induction identifies the actual strict fiber of PKm→Km with Km−1, contracts its total space, and identifies S1 as a marked K(Z,1). Finite join models for the circle and the two-point group and Milnor's join model is a contractible free G-space give the contractible infinite-sphere total and the numerable principal bundle S1→S∞→CP∞ in the actual weak CW model. Numerable fiber bundles are hurewicz fibrations and Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration give its homotopy exact sequence. Existence and homotopy uniqueness of Eilenberg--Mac Lane spaces supplies marked model comparison. Cohomology ring of infinite complex projective space computes the integral cohomology of CP∞ as Z[a], ∣a∣=2, and its degreewise finite homology.

[F2]

Homological Serre spectral sequence, Cohomological Serre spectral sequence and Multiplicative cohomological Serre spectral sequence supply the actual constant-system sequences, strong convergence, and the total-degree Leibniz rule. Absolute Hurewicz theorem at the first nonzero degree makes Km (m−1)-connected with its first integral homology Z in degree m. The singular pair sequences of Long exact sequence of a pair and Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology apply to the actual path total and strict fiber without a CW-pair hypothesis; their boundary and connector maps are natural.

[F3]

Topological universal coefficient short exact sequence for cohomology, The universal coefficient theorem for homology over a PID and The fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups from PID modules give coefficient comparisons and the cyclic decomposition. Rational cohomology of Eilenberg–Mac Lane spaces in one generator computes rational cohomology as a polynomial algebra on the degree-m fundamental class for even m, and an exterior algebra for odd m.

[F4]

A transgressive simple fiber system gives a polynomial base proves the mod-two polynomial-base comparison for a transgressive simple fiber system. Relative lifts produce cohomological transgressions proves the relative-lift transgression statement and its compatibility with each square, with the actual strict fiber.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3

First derive the integral degree-two model from the actual principal bundle in [F1]. Its total S∞ is contractible and its fiber S1 is a marked K(Z,1). The fibration exact sequence gives πi(CP∞)≅πi−1(S1) for every i≥2, while its component segment gives π1(CP∞)=0 because S1 is connected. Thus CP∞ is a CW K(Z,2), with its degree-two generator marked by this connecting isomorphism. Marked uniqueness in [F1] compares it with the chosen K2, so the integral ring and finite-homology base case apply to that actual model. All integral homology groups of every Km are finitely generated. Start with K2 in [F1], and induct on m using its path fibration. Within this induction induct on the base homology degree k. In the homological sequence the bottom term Ek,02=Hk(Km) has no incoming differential. Every outgoing target has bidegree (k−r,r−1) with smaller base degree. Its E2 group is finitely generated by the coefficient UCT, the induction on k, and the finite generation of the fiber homology. Hence every outgoing image is finitely generated. Only finitely many such maps occur, and the surviving subgroup is zero because the total space is contractible. The successive kernels express the bottom group as a finite extension of finitely generated images. This proves the induction; all bases are simply connected, so there is no coefficient monodromy.

1.2F1F4F5

We construct the mod-two calculation for the integral models, rather than use a theorem about K(F2,m). For m≥2, the algebra H∗(Km;F2) is polynomial on SqIιˉm with I admissible, containing no Sq1, and e(I)<m. The initial case is the polynomial ring on ιˉ2 from [F1]. For the induction, powers z2j of each polynomial generator form a simple system: unique binary expansion of each exponent makes products of distinct such powers a basis. The following index calculation identifies these powers without a hidden counting step. If I=(i1,I′) is admissible, then i1=e(I)+∣I′∣. When e(I)=m, its operation on ιˉm is the square of SqI′ιˉm by the top-square formula. Removing the first entry repeatedly therefore expresses it as a unique 2j-power of an admissible sequence of excess less than m. Conversely, prepend m+∣I∣ to an admissible I of excess at most m; it remains admissible, has excess m, and evaluates to the square. Thus the simple system is indexed precisely by admissible sequences with no Sq1 and excess at most m.

1.3F1F2F3

We now give the entire odd-prime calculation needed, rather than import an odd-primary operation algebra. Fix an odd prime p and R=Z(p). In all following path sequences, x denotes the fundamental base class of degree m and a the fundamental fiber class of degree m−1. Their first differential is dma=x; replacing a marked generator by its negative fixes the sign if necessary. Leibniz gives dm(ak)=kak−1x when a is even. For an odd a, one has a2=0 since 2 is a unit. Coefficient systems in nonzero free rows are literal copies of R; a torsion row uses Hs(Km;R/p), not an unjustified tensor-product formula. Such coefficients vanish for 0<s<m by connectivity.

2.1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.2

The fundamental fiber class has a relative lift transgressing to the fundamental base class. Put B=Km+1, E=PB and F=ΩB, for m≥2. Represent the marked generator by a:(Dm+1,∂Dm+1)→(B,∗). Contract the disk to a chosen boundary point and apply a to the contraction, read from that point to x; this gives a continuous lift v:Dm+1→PB with pv=a and v(∂Dm+1)⊂F. By the connecting marking in [F1], its boundary represents the marked generator of πm(F). Absolute Hurewicz in [F2], transported along the marked equivalence Km→F, makes that boundary the generator of Hm(F;Z). Since E is contractible, the singular pair boundary Hm+1(E,F;Z)→Hm(F;Z) is an isomorphism and the lower positive relative homology vanishes. Thus v represents its generator, which p sends to the marked generator of Hm+1(B,∗;Z). The UCT and naturality of evaluation now give διˉm=p∗ιˉm+1 in the actual relative cohomology group: both evaluate as one on this generator. No CW structure on (E,F) is asserted. By [F4] every composite SqI is relatively transgressive with representative SqIιˉm+1. Apply the Borel comparison [F4] to the locally finite simple system from step 1.2; it gives the polynomial algebra on admissible sequences of excess at most m, equivalently less than m+1, containing no Sq1. This proves the induction, including linear independence.

2.2F1F2step 1.3

For m=3, the fiber is R[a], ∣a∣=2, and d3(ak)=kak−1x, with x2=0 since ∣x∣=3. Through total degree nine, only k≤4 occurs in a first-column source. If p≥5, all 1,2,3,4 are units; the displayed pairs cancel, leaving only R in base degrees zero and three through degree nine. To justify that no unlisted bottom class is hidden, take the first such base column. Its possible incoming sources have smaller base column, hence column zero or three. The zero-column powers and column-three products have just been paired by d3, so no source survives to hit it. It would survive to the contractible total, a contradiction.

3.1F3F5step 1.1step 2.1

For n≥8, degree n+6<2n contains no product of two positive-degree generators from step 2.1. Its basis is exactly Sq6ιˉn,Sq4Sq2ιˉn. Adem gives Sq1Sq6ιˉn=Sq7ιˉn and Sq1Sq4Sq2ιˉn=Sq5Sq2ιˉn. These are distinct basis classes in degree n+7<2n. Thus Sq1 is injective on degree n+6. Every reduction of an integral class is in its kernel, since βZρ2=0. The coefficient exact sequence embeds Hn+6(Kn;Z)/2 into this kernel, so that quotient is zero. Finite generation from step 1.1 shows that Hn+6(Kn;Z) has neither a free part nor any two-primary torsion.

3.2F2step 1.3step 2.2

For p=3 the same calculation has precisely one surviving group through that range: R/3 at bidegree (3,4), the cokernel on a2x of d3(a3)=3a2x. The source a3 itself dies, since multiplication by three on R is injective; a4 dies with coefficient four. The first-unlisted-column argument of step 2.2 makes the other columns between three and eight zero. The surviving R/3 can only die by d5 to (8,0), so contractibility makes that differential an isomorphism and H8(K3;R)=R/3. A differential into (9,0) could only come from column zero, where a4 has died, or column three with fiber degree five, which is zero; column eight would require r=1. Therefore H9(K3;R)=0. This proves that through degree nine the nonzero positive groups are R in degree three and, only for p=3, R/3 in degree eight.

4.1F2F3step 1.3step 2.2step 3.2

The next five calculations give a finite table, with T=R/3 if p=3 and T=0 if p≥5: for 3≤m≤7, through degree m+6 the nonzero positive groups are R in degree m, T in degree m+5, and also R in degree 2m when m=4 or 6. We verify every transition, including the extra degree. For m=4, the free fiber generator is odd of degree three; its d4 maps axk to xk+1, so the free base classes through degree ten are exactly x,x2. The torsion fiber class, if present, has degree eight; its only possible nonzero differential is its transgression d9 to bottom degree nine. Earlier targets with nonzero base column four or eight have fiber degrees five or one, both zero; the potential target at (6,3) has zero base group in degree six. All other targets have zero base column or zero fiber row. Contractibility makes d9 an isomorphism onto T. For bottom degree ten, the first-column source has fiber degree nine and is zero by step 3.2; columns four and eight require fiber degrees five and one, and column nine would require r=1. Hence degree ten is zero.

5.1F2F3step 1.3step 4.1

For m=5, the free fiber classes in the required range are a,a2 in degrees four and eight. They die by d5a=x and d5a2=2ax, with two a unit; the odd base class satisfies x2=0. The fiber T in degree nine has no earlier nonzero target: the only candidate positive base column before its transgression is column five with fiber degree five, which is zero; other positive columns below ten vanish. Its d10 therefore gives the sole torsion group T in base degree ten. An incoming differential to degree eleven has first-column source degree ten, zero by step 4.1, or column-five source fiber degree five, also zero. Thus degree eleven is zero, and the stated table holds for m=5.

6.1F2F3step 1.3step 5.1

For m=6, the free fundamental fiber class has degree five. The possible d6:T=E60,10→E66,5=Rxa is zero because its source is torsion and its target is free. Connectivity and the already computed lower groups leave this target equal to R through page six; no earlier differential changes it. The torsion class consequently survives to its transgression d11, which is an isomorphism onto the bottom group T in degree eleven. For degree twelve the first-column source is fiber degree eleven, zero by step 5.1. The sole other source is Rxa at (6,5) with d6(xa)=x2. Contractibility makes this surject onto the whole degree-twelve group. Its rational rank is one by [F3], so this surjection from R is also injective. Hence degree twelve is Rx2, with no torsion. This explains why the torsion row at (0,10) cannot be omitted even though the odd fundamental class has square zero.

7.1F2F3step 1.3step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1

For m=7, the fiber T in degree eleven transgresses isomorphically to the bottom group T in degree twelve. All earlier possible positive-column targets have fiber degree at most five and vanish. The fiber class a2 of degree twelve is killed earlier by d7(a2)=2ax, an isomorphism between the free copies of R at (0,12) and (7,6). Thus it cannot survive to hit degree thirteen. Every other positive-column source to degree thirteen again requires fiber degree at most five, below the fiber's first positive degree six. Hence H13(K7;R)=0. The free and torsion groups in all the stated ranges are now completely listed. The first-unlisted-column argument from step 2.2 rules out an additional bottom group at every intermediate zero degree in these finite calculations for m=4,5,6,7: its surviving potential sources are exactly the free pair and the indicated single torsion transgression, already accounted for.

8.1F2step 7.1

For m≥8, a mixed positive-column/positive-row term in total degree through m+6 would have degree at least m+(m−1)=2m−1>m+6. Thus only the axes occur in the whole relevant incoming-differential region. Every positive fiber class in degrees through m+5 transgresses to the next base degree, since the total space is contractible. The induction table of step 7.1 therefore shifts by one: base degree m is R, degree m+5 is T, and degree m+6 is zero, with all intervening groups zero. In particular Hn+6(Kn;Z(p))=0 for every odd prime p and n≥8. There is no additive extension ambiguity in these assertions about the bottom axis: its entire incoming list and its zero abutment have been specified.

9.1A1F3step 1.1step 3.1step 8.1∎

Steps 3.1 and 8.1 eliminate every primary torsion subgroup of Hn+6(Kn;Z); localization of cohomology agrees with cohomology with localized coefficients here by the finite-generation coefficient UCT, so these are the actual primary groups. By the cohomological UCT, its torsion subgroup is Ext⁡(Hn+5(Kn;Z),Z). The rational computation in [F3] gives Hn+5(Kn;Q)=0, since n<n+5<2n. Finite generation from step 1.1 then kills both the torsion and free parts of Hn+5. Thus Hn+5(Kn;Z)=0, as claimed.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

157 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources