How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite-array normal limit from vanishing fourth moments
Statement
Assume Countable Choice, and suppose the probability law with density is supplied. Write ; normalization is part of the given probability-law hypothesis. For each positive integer , let be independent centered real random variables, where is finite and each variable has a finite fourth moment. Different rows need not share a probability space. Suppose
Then, for ,
The same conclusion applies to any specified sequence of finite arrays satisfying these two limits; no identical-distribution hypothesis is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The supplied normalized scalar Gaussian probability law and the finite independent arrays in the Statement.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): Countable Choice is assumed. No family of uncountably many auxiliary random variables is constructed.
For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique and Independent random elements have product joint law: finite products of probability laws exist, have the rectangle formula, and give the joint law of a finite independent family.
Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: absolutely integrable functions on a finite product of probability spaces can be integrated successively.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: under Countable Choice, a scalar invertible affine substitution has the usual Jacobian formula for nonnegative Lebesgue integrals.
Taylor's Lagrange remainder follows from repeated Rolle steps: for a function with third derivative bounded by , expansion through degree two at has remainder of absolute value at most .
If are differentiable on with integrable, then : on each finite interval, differentiable functions with integrable derivatives satisfy the integration-by-parts identity. The polynomial and Gaussian functions used below are continuously differentiable on every , with continuous, hence integrable, derivatives.
The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at : every fixed polynomial times tends to zero as ; for odd powers this follows by putting and bounding by an integer power of for .
Monotone convergence for the integral: the integrals of the nonnegative truncations increase to the integral over as integer .
Proof
For each row put and . Finite products in [F1] allow us to integrate replacement coordinates with independent centered Gaussian laws of variances ; a zero variance means the point mass at zero. These products need not be coupled across rows. The supplied scalar density already has integral one, so [F3] gives its scaled probability laws without a separate Gaussian-normalization theorem. For , direct differentiation gives . On , apply [F5] with and then to obtain The boundary terms tend to zero by [F6]; [F7] and the supplied normalization then give and . Odd moments vanish by symmetry. Consequently a replacement coordinate has mean zero, variance and fourth moment .
The sum of the replacement coordinates has law . One can verify this using only scalar integration: for positive variances , Fubini and the substitution make the sum density the convolution of the two scalar densities. Completing the square in and using [F3] together with the given unit Gaussian integral makes that convolution . Induction gives the assertion for every finite row, and zero-variance coordinates have no effect. The absolute integrals here are finite because they are probability densities.
Let be bounded and on , with bounded first, second and third derivatives. In the finite product integral replace by one coordinate at a time. Conditional on the other coordinates, the constant, linear and quadratic terms of the Taylor expansion of at their sum have the same integrals, since both coordinates have mean zero and variance . The two remainders are bounded by [F4]. Fubini is legitimate since is bounded and the displayed moments are finite. Summing the telescoping differences therefore gives .
Cauchy--Schwarz, first for each coordinate integral and then for the finite index sum, gives . Also , by expanding the nonnegative integral of . Hence , and the same calculation with the Gaussian fourth moments in step 1.1 gives . Both Cauchy--Schwarz inequalities follow by expanding a nonnegative square and minimizing its scalar coefficient, for the coordinate integral and the finite index sum respectively. Thus the replacement error in step 2.2 tends to zero for each such test .
For , a concrete cutoff is obtained by integrating the nonnegative polynomial on , normalizing its integral to one, and extending the resulting cumulative function by zero and one outside that interval. Its first three derivatives join continuously at the endpoints. Translate, rescale and subtract this function from one to bound from below and above by bounded functions that differ only on . Apply step 3.1 to these two fixed cutoffs. By step 2.1 the replacement sum has variance ; its probability of this interval is at most , and its distribution at each fixed endpoint converges to scaled by . Taking and then proves for every real .
Finally fix . Choose finitely many increasing real grid points so that the two tails of the limiting normal law each have mass below and its mass between consecutive grid points is below . Such a finite grid exists because its density is bounded and its total integral is one. Step 4.1 gives convergence at every grid point simultaneously. Between consecutive points monotonicity of the two distribution functions bounds their difference by the largest grid-point difference plus ; the tail intervals have the same bound using zero and one. Thus the supremum in the Statement has limsup at most . Letting proves the asserted uniform convergence. All replacements were finite products of supplied probability laws, and the only additional choice hypothesis remains [A1].
Depends on
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique
- Independent random elements have product joint law
- Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product
- A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions
- Taylor's Lagrange remainder follows from repeated Rolle steps
- If $u,v$ are differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $u',v'$ integrable, then $\int_a^b u v' = u(b)v(b)-u(a)v(a) - \int_a^b u'v$
- The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at $+\infty$
- Monotone convergence for the integral
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rick Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, Version 5 (11 January 2019), section 3.4.2 (standard reference, not scraped)