Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth lowest-order Nedelec and RT0 interpolation estimate

Statement

Assume Countable Choice only in the H(div)/Piola space branch inherited from the suppliers below. Let Th be a finite matching affine tetrahedral mesh of a bounded polyhedron, with shape-regularity constant σ and h=max⁡KhK. Assume material interfaces are mesh-aligned. Let u,v be piecewise C1 on cell closures, with curl⁡u, div⁡v also piecewise C1, and with matching tangential traces of u and matching normal traces of v. The canonical edge and face moment interpolants Ih1,Ih2 are those in Whitney edge, face, and cell moments commute with grad, curl, and div. Then ∥u−Ih1u∥L2(Ω)+∥curl⁡(u−Ih1u)∥L2(Ω)+∥v−Ih2v∥L2(Ω)+∥div⁡(v−Ih2v)∥L2(Ω)≤Cσh∣Ω∣1/2max⁡K∈Th(∥∇u∥L∞(K)+∥∇curl⁡u∥L∞(K)+∥∇v∥L∞(K)+∥∇div⁡v∥L∞(K)). The constant depends only on reference-element basis norms and σ. This estimate is only for the canonical smooth-input interpolants; it makes no boundedness claim on all of H(curl⁡) or H(div⁡).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite matching shape-regular affine tetrahedral mesh, the real lowest-order Nedelec and RT0 local spaces, and piecewise smooth fields with the stated trace compatibility.

[A1]

Countable Choice means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. It is inherited from the affine Piola and H(div) definitions; no stronger Choice axiom is used. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The local spaces are the span of the six Whitney edge fields ϕij=λi∇λj−λj∇λi and RT0(K)={a+cx:a∈R3,c∈R}. (Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces)

[F2]

The six oriented edge circulations are unisolvent and the local edge space is {a+b×x:a,b∈R3}, so it contains every constant vector field. (Lowest-order Nedelec edge circulation unisolvence)

[F3]

For smooth inputs the moment interpolants are globally conforming and commute cellwise with gradient, curl, and divergence; in particular curl⁡Ih1u=Ih2curl⁡u and div⁡Ih2v=Ih3div⁡v. (Whitney edge, face, and cell moments commute with grad, curl, and div)

[F4]

Covariant and contravariant affine Piola maps preserve oriented edge and face moments, with pushforwards A−Tu^ and (det⁡A)−1Av^. (Affine Piola maps commute with differential operators and preserve moments)

[F5]

Shape regularity gives ∥AK∥≤CσhK, ∥AK−1∥≤CσhK−1, and cσhK3≤∣K∣≤CσhK3. (Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity)

Proof

1.1A1F1F4F5givenalgebra

On a fixed reference tetrahedron, each canonical basis function has finite L2 norm. Under the covariant Piola map, [F4] and [F5] give ∥ϕK,e∥L2(K)≤CσhK−1hK3/2=CσhK1/2 for each edge basis function. Under the contravariant Piola map they give ∥ψK,F∥L2(K)≤CσhK−3hKhK3/2=CσhK−1/2 for each unit-face-flux RT0 basis function.

1.2F3givenalgebra

By [F3], div⁡IK2v=IK3div⁡v, and IK3 is the cell average because its defining degree of freedom is the cell integral. Thus ∣div⁡v(x)−IK3div⁡v∣≤hK∥∇div⁡v∥L∞(K) throughout K, and ∥div⁡(v−IK2v)∥L2(K)≤ChK5/2∥∇div⁡v∥L∞(K).

2.1A1F1F2step 1.1givenalgebra

Fix K and xK∈K, and put uK=u(xK), a constant vector in the local Nedelec space by [F2]. For each of its six edges, the mean-value bound gives ∣∫e(u−uK)⋅t ds∣≤hK2∥∇u∥L∞(K). By edge-moment unisolvence [F2], IK1(u−uK) is the sum of these six coefficients times the corresponding basis functions. Step 1.1 and ∥u−uK∥L2(K)≤ChK5/2∥∇u∥∞ therefore yield ∥u−IK1u∥L2(K)≤CσhK5/2∥∇u∥L∞(K).

2.2A1F1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Set q=curl⁡u and qK=q(xK), a constant RT0 field. By the curl commuting identity [F3], curl⁡IK1u=IK2q. Each face-flux coefficient of q−qK is at most ChK3∥∇q∥L∞(K); multiplying the four coefficients by the RT0 basis bounds in step 1.1 and adding ∥q−qK∥L2(K) gives ∥curl⁡(u−IK1u)∥L2(K)≤CσhK5/2∥∇curl⁡u∥L∞(K).

2.3A1F1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

For v, set vK=v(xK), again a constant in RT0. Each of the four face-flux coefficients of v−vK is bounded by ChK3∥∇v∥L∞(K). The RT0 basis scaling in step 1.1 and ∥v−vK∥L2(K)≤ChK5/2∥∇v∥∞ give ∥v−IK2v∥L2(K)≤CσhK5/2∥∇v∥L∞(K).

3.1F3F5step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3step 1.2algebra∎

Square and sum the four local bounds. By [F5], hK5≤Cσh2∣K∣; the cell interiors are disjoint and sum to Ω. Taking square roots gives the displayed global estimate with the maximum cell derivative bound and the factor ∣Ω∣1/2. The matching traces and the conformity part of [F3] assemble the interpolants globally.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources