Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

H1 traces agree across interior mesh facets

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let D be a polyhedral open set with a conforming affine simplicial mesh, let K+ and K− share an interior facet F, and let w∈H1(D). The elementwise L2(F) traces of w∣K+ and w∣K− agree almost everywhere on F.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, adjacent mesh cells K+,K−, their shared interior facet F, and one global Sobolev class w∈H1(D).

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the Sobolev, smooth-density and mollification interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Each element restriction has a unique bounded L2 facet trace, obtained by continuous extension from smooth-neighborhood functions. (H1 facet trace inequality on shape-regular simplices)

[F2]

The smooth-bump lemma gives χ∈Cc∞(B1/2(0)) with 0≤χ≤1 and χ=1 on B‾1/4(0). Its support is bounded, and B1/4(0) contains the cube (−1/(8d),1/(8d))d of positive measure by A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included; hence 0<m:=∫χ<∞ by Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure. The normalized bump ρ:=χ/m is a nonnegative unit-mass bump supported in B1(0). Its rescalings are an L1 approximate identity by A unit-mass smooth bump generates an L1 approximate identity. The same smooth-bump lemma supplies cutoffs equal to one near a compact subset of an open set by a finite ball cover. (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump, A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure, A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included)

[F3]

Approximate identities converge in L2(Rd), and mollification commutes with first weak derivatives in an interior neighborhood. (Every L1 approximate identity converges to the identity in Lp for 1≤p<∞, Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives)

[F4]

A Sobolev H1(Rd) function is in L2; on each compact set, Holder's inequality and finite measure make it L1. Thus W∈H1(Rd) is locally integrable, and convolution with its smooth compactly supported mollifier is smooth. (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure, Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign)

Proof

1.1A1F2givenconstructalgebra

Fix a compact (d−1)-simplex G contained in the relative interior of F. A sufficiently small open tube around G has closure in D. Cover its closure by finitely many balls whose larger concentric balls still have closure in D; [F2] supplies a smooth cutoff equal to one on each smaller ball and supported in its larger ball. The function χ=1−∏i(1−χi) is compactly supported in D and equals one near G. The zero extension W of χw belongs to H1(Rd): for a test function ψ, the weak product rule follows directly from ∫Dχw ∂iψ=∫Dw ∂i(χψ)−∫Dw(∂iχ)ψ=−∫D(χ∂iw+w∂iχ)ψ, and compact support of χ removes any boundary term on extension.

2.1A1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Let Wε=ρε∗W with the mollifier of [F2]. By [F3] applied to W and its weak derivatives, and by derivative commutation on the tube where χ=1, Wε→w in H1 on every smaller tube around G. Each Wε is smooth by [F4]. Cover G by finitely many smaller simplices on each side whose shared facet portions lie in that tube. The trace bound [F1] on each smaller simplex shows the traces of Wε converge in L2 there to the local traces of w. By locality and uniqueness of the bounded trace extension, these are the restrictions of the elementwise traces defined on K+ and K−. The smooth Wε has identical restrictions from both sides, so the two traces are equal; their limits are equal as well.

3.1A1step 2.1algebra∎

Countably many compact facet simplices G exhaust the relative interior of F; its boundary has (d−1)-dimensional measure zero. Step 2.1 gives equality on each such patch, hence equality almost everywhere on all of F.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources