How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
H1 traces agree across interior mesh facets
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be a polyhedral open set with a conforming affine simplicial mesh, let and share an interior facet , and let . The elementwise traces of and agree almost everywhere on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, adjacent mesh cells , their shared interior facet , and one global Sobolev class .
Countable Choice is inherited from the Sobolev, smooth-density and mollification interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Each element restriction has a unique bounded facet trace, obtained by continuous extension from smooth-neighborhood functions. (H1 facet trace inequality on shape-regular simplices)
The smooth-bump lemma gives with and on . Its support is bounded, and contains the cube of positive measure by A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included; hence by Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure. The normalized bump is a nonnegative unit-mass bump supported in . Its rescalings are an approximate identity by A unit-mass smooth bump generates an approximate identity. The same smooth-bump lemma supplies cutoffs equal to one near a compact subset of an open set by a finite ball cover. (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump, A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included)
Approximate identities converge in , and mollification commutes with first weak derivatives in an interior neighborhood. (Every approximate identity converges to the identity in for , Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives)
A Sobolev function is in ; on each compact set, Holder's inequality and finite measure make it . Thus is locally integrable, and convolution with its smooth compactly supported mollifier is smooth. (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure, Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign)
Proof
Fix a compact -simplex contained in the relative interior of . A sufficiently small open tube around has closure in . Cover its closure by finitely many balls whose larger concentric balls still have closure in ; [F2] supplies a smooth cutoff equal to one on each smaller ball and supported in its larger ball. The function is compactly supported in and equals one near . The zero extension of belongs to : for a test function , the weak product rule follows directly from and compact support of removes any boundary term on extension.
Let with the mollifier of [F2]. By [F3] applied to and its weak derivatives, and by derivative commutation on the tube where , in on every smaller tube around . Each is smooth by [F4]. Cover by finitely many smaller simplices on each side whose shared facet portions lie in that tube. The trace bound [F1] on each smaller simplex shows the traces of converge in there to the local traces of . By locality and uniqueness of the bounded trace extension, these are the restrictions of the elementwise traces defined on and . The smooth has identical restrictions from both sides, so the two traces are equal; their limits are equal as well.
Countably many compact facet simplices exhaust the relative interior of ; its boundary has -dimensional measure zero. Step 2.1 gives equality on each such patch, hence equality almost everywhere on all of .
Depends on
- H1 facet trace inequality on shape-regular simplices
- Smooth-neighborhood density in H1 of a simplex
- The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Every $L^1$ approximate identity converges to the identity in $L^p$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
- Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives
- Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign
- Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has finite outer measure
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- A unit-mass smooth bump generates an $L^1$ approximate identity
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Luc Guermond, MATH 661 Fall 2025, Part III Chapter 16: Local interpolation in H(div) and H(curl) (I) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)