Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth-neighborhood density in H1 of a simplex

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let K⊂Rd be a nondegenerate open simplex. For every u∈H1(K;R) and every ε>0, there is a function uε smooth on an open neighborhood of K‾ with ∥uε−u∥H1(K)<ε.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a nondegenerate simplex K, a real Sobolev class u∈W1,2(K), and ε>0.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited through the published Sobolev, density, change-of-variables, and mollification interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

W1,2(K) consists of real L2 classes with first weak derivatives in L2(K). (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F2]

For every g∈L2(Rd) and η>0, some ϕ∈Cc∞(Rd) satisfies ∥g−ϕ∥2<η. (Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L2)

[F3]

An invertible linear map scales Lebesgue measure by its absolute determinant, and translations preserve measurability and measure. Thus an affine map T(x)=Ax+b satisfies ∣T(E)∣=∣det⁡A∣ ∣E∣. Applying this identity to indicator functions, then nonnegative simple functions and their increasing approximations, and finally positive and negative parts gives ∫T(E)f(y) dy=∣det⁡A∣∫Ef(T(x)) dx for integrable real f (and for nonnegative measurable f). Null sets are preserved in both directions, so composition also respects almost-everywhere classes. (A linear map T of Rn sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) when T is invertible and T[E] Lebesgue null when it is not, Lebesgue outer measure, Lebesgue measurability and Lebesgue measure are unchanged by translation)

[F4]

The smooth-bump lemma gives χ∈Cc∞(B1/2(0)) with 0≤χ≤1 and χ=1 on B‾1/4(0). Its support has finite measure by Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure, while B1/4(0) contains the cube (−1/(8d),1/(8d))d, whose measure is positive by A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included. Thus m:=∫χ is finite and positive. The normalized bump ρ:=χ/m has unit mass and support in B1(0); its rescalings are an L1 approximate identity by A unit-mass smooth bump generates an L1 approximate identity. (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls, The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump)

[F5]

For every g∈L2(Rd), ∥ρη∗g−g∥2→0 as η→0+. (Every L1 approximate identity converges to the identity in Lp for 1≤p<∞)

[F6]

Interior mollification commutes with first weak derivatives: if w∈H1(U) and the η-neighborhood of K lies inside U, then Di(ρη∗w)=ρη∗(Diw) on K. (Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives)

[F7]

Convolution of a locally integrable function with a smooth compactly supported mollifier is smooth and derivatives pass under the integral sign. (Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign)

[F8]

An L2 function on a bounded set is locally integrable by Holder's inequality and finiteness of Lebesgue measure on bounded sets. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure)

Proof

1.1A1F1F3constructalgebra

Choose c∈K and s∈(0,1), and put Ts(x)=c+s(x−c) and Us=Ts−1(K). Since K is convex and c is interior, Ts(K‾) is a compact subset of K; hence Us is an open simplex containing K‾ with positive distance from K‾ to Usc. Define us=u∘Ts on Us. For ψ∈Cc∞(Us), change variables y=Ts(x) in the weak derivative identity of u; with ψ~(y)=ψ(Ts−1y) one has Dyiψ~=s−1(Dxiψ)∘Ts−1, so the identity gives Dius=s(Diu)∘Ts distributionally.

1.2F2F3algebraalgebra

For any g∈L2(K), extend it by zero to Rd. Given η>0, choose ϕ∈Cc∞(Rd) with ∥g−ϕ∥L2(K)<η by [F2]. Because Ts(K)⊂K, change of variables [F3] gives ∥(g−ϕ)∘Ts∥L2(K)≤s−d/2η, while uniform continuity of ϕ on K‾ gives ∥ϕ∘Ts−ϕ∥L2(K)→0 as s→1−. The triangle inequality and arbitrary η therefore show ∥g∘Ts−g∥L2(K)→0.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Apply step 1.2 to g=u and to every g=Diu. By step 1.1, Dius=s(Diu)∘Ts, and s→1; hence us∣K→u in the full H1(K) norm as s→1−.

3.1A1F4F5F6F7F8step 2.1choosealgebra∎

Choose s close enough to 1 that ∥us−u∥H1(K)<ε/2, and let r=dist⁡(K‾,Usc)>0. Choose the bump from [F4] and then 0<δ<r. The zero extension of us is locally integrable by [F8], so wδ=(ρδ∗E0us) is smooth by [F7]. On K, [F6] gives Diwδ=ρδ∗E0(Dius). Each zero extension is in L2(Rd); [F5] therefore gives ∥wδ−us∥H1(K)→0 as δ→0+. Choose δ<r small enough to make this norm less than ε/2. Then wδ is smooth on a neighborhood of K‾, and the triangle inequality with step 2.1 gives ∥wδ−u∥H1(K)<ε.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

115 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources