Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

H1 facet trace inequality on shape-regular simplices

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For a nondegenerate affine simplex K with diameter hK and shape bound hK/rK≤γ, and any facet F, every u∈H1(K) has a well-defined trace γFu∈L2(F) and

∥γFu∥L2(F)2≤C(d,γ)(hK−1∥u∥L2(K)2+hK∥∇u∥L2(K)2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a nondegenerate shape-regular affine simplex K, one facet F, and u∈H1(K).

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the Sobolev and smooth-density interfaces. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

Restrictions of functions smooth on a neighborhood of the closed simplex are dense in its H1 norm. (Smooth-neighborhood density in H1 of a simplex)

[F2]

Shape regularity gives ∣det⁡A∣≍hKd, ∥A∥≤ChK, ∥A−1∥≤C(d,γ)hK−1, and facet area scale comparable to hKd−1. (Shape regularity controls affine simplex geometry)

[F3]

Cauchy–Schwarz controls integrals of products on the facet and simplex. (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2)

[F4]

Fubini's theorem permits changing the order of the finite integrals in the segment estimate. (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product)

Proof

1.1A1F3F4constructalgebra

It suffices first to prove the reference estimate for a smooth function. On the reference simplex choose a facet F^ opposite a vertex a, and parameterize inward segments by x(y,t)=(1−t)y+ta, y∈F^, 0≤t≤12. For fixed y and t in [14,12], the fundamental theorem of calculus and Cauchy–Schwarz give ∣u(y)∣2≤2∣u(x(y,t))∣2+2t∫0t∣(a−y)⋅∇u(x(y,s))∣2,ds. Integrate in y and t. The segment Jacobian is a fixed positive constant times (1−t)d−1, bounded above and below on this interval; ∣a−y∣ is bounded on the compact reference simplex. Changing variables in the first integral and using Fubini [F4] in the second bounds ∥u∥L2(F^)2 by Cd(∥u∥L2(K^)2+∥∇u∥L2(K^)2).

2.1F2F5step 1.1algebra

For a general affine simplex write x=b+Ax^ and u^=u∘F. The affine change of variables [F5] gives ∥u^∥L2(K^)2=∣det⁡A∣−1∥u∥L2(K)2 and ∥∇x^u^∥22≤∣det⁡A∣−1∥A∥2∥∇xu∥22. Facet surface measure scales by the corresponding cofactor, with factor comparable to hKd−1; substituting [F2] into step 1.1 yields the asserted hK−1 and hK factors.

3.1A1F1step 2.1algebraalgebra∎

For smooth-neighborhood approximants un→u in H1(K) from [F1], step 2.1 applied to un−um makes their facet restrictions Cauchy in L2(F). Define γFu as this limit. If another such sequence is chosen, the same bound applied to the difference of the sequences shows the same limit, so the trace is well-defined. Passing to the limit in step 2.1 gives the displayed bound for u.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources