Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth fields are approximated by the lowest-order edge family

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω⊂R3 be a bounded Lipschitz polyhedron with a shape-regular refining family of matching affine tetrahedral meshes Th, with maximum cell diameter h→0. For every w∈Cc∞(Ω;R3), the canonical lowest-order Nedelec edge interpolant Ihw, defined by its six oriented edge circulations on each tetrahedron, is well-defined. For all sufficiently small h it belongs to H0(curl⁡;Ω), and ∥Ihw−w∥H(curl⁡;Ω)⟶0. The edge moments are applied only to smooth fields here; this statement does not extend them to arbitrary H(curl⁡) inputs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; the domain and mesh family; a compactly supported smooth vector field w; and the lowest-order local edge shape functions.

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed by the imported L2 approximate-identity convergence theorem. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

On an affine tetrahedron the six edge shape functions span the local first-family Nedelec space. If K is the image of the reference tetrahedron under x=BKx^+b, then ∇λi=BK−T∇λ^i. Shape regularity gives ∥BK−1∥≤ChK−1 and ∣K∣1/2≤ChK3/2, so each Whitney basis field has L2(K) norm at most ChK1/2. (Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces, Matching affine simplicial meshes and shape regularity)

[F2]

The six oriented edge circulations are unisolvent, so prescribed edge moments determine a unique local field. (Lowest-order Nedelec edge circulation unisolvence)

[F3]

Matching edge moments assemble a global H(curl⁡) edge field, and Stokes gives the face-flux identity for its curl. The supplier's proof establishes these statements for the stated smooth inputs. (Whitney edge, face, and cell moments commute with grad, curl, and div)

[F4]

Every L1 approximate identity on R3 converges strongly on L2 inputs; this applies separately to a compactly supported field and its distributional curl. (Every L1 approximate identity converges to the identity in Lp for 1≤p<∞, An L1 approximate identity on Rn)

[F5]

For 0<r<R, a smooth function ρ:R3→[0,1] can equal one on B‾r(0) and have support in BR(0). (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)

[F6]

Every Euclidean ball in R3 has positive finite Lebesgue measure. (Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure)

[F7]

Distributional derivatives commute with convolution against a compactly supported smooth kernel. (Distributional derivatives commute with test-function convolution)

[F8]

Convolution with a compactly supported smooth unit-mass kernel is smooth. (Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign)

Proof

Given: Countable Choice; a shape-regular matching tetrahedral family; and w∈Cc∞(Ω;R3).

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

On each cell K, [F2] defines the local interpolant IKw by its six edge moments. To verify constants belong to the local space, write ϕij=λi∇λj−λj∇λi with ϕji=−ϕij. Then ∑j≠iϕij=−∇λi because ∑jλj=1. For each coordinate ℓ, the barycentric identity xℓ=∑i(xi)ℓλi gives eℓ=∇xℓ=∑i(xi)ℓ∇λi, so every constant vector lies in the local span. Unisolvence [F2] then makes IK reproduce constants. Fix xK∈K and put rK(x)=w(x)−w(xK). Then ∥rK∥L∞(K)≤hK∥Dw∥L∞(K), so every edge moment of rK has absolute value at most hK2∥Dw∥L∞(K). By [F1], summing the six moment coefficients against their basis functions gives ∥IKrK∥L2(K)≤ChK5/2∥Dw∥L∞(K) and ∥rK∥L2(K)≤ChK5/2∥Dw∥L∞(K). Consequently ∥IKw−w∥L2(K)≤ChK5/2∥Dw∥L∞(K).

1.2A1F3F4F5F6F7F8givenconstruct

By [F3] the local fields assemble to a global H(curl⁡) field. If w=0, then Ihw=0∈H0(curl⁡;Ω). Otherwise let d=dist⁡(supp⁡w,∂Ω)>0 and take h<d/2. Any cell with a nonzero edge moment lies within distance h of supp⁡w, so the assembled interpolant has compact support in Ω. Its zero extension U is in H(curl⁡;R3): cellwise integration by parts cancels the interior face terms by [F3], and there is no boundary jump because U vanishes near ∂Ω. Choose ρ as in [F5] with r=1/2 and R=1, and put c=(∫R3ρ)−1. Then 0<c<∞ by [F6]. For η>0, set κη(x)=cη−3ρ(x/η). This family is nonnegative, has unit integral and L1 norm one, and is supported in Bη(0); hence it is an L1 approximate identity by An L1 approximate identity on Rn. Take ηj=(d−h)/(j+2), so ηj<d−h and ηj→0. By [F8], κηj∗U is smooth. The support of U lies within distance h of supp⁡w, so dist⁡(supp⁡U,∂Ω)≥d−h. Since supp⁡κηj⊂Bηj(0), the convolution vanishes when dist⁡(x,supp⁡U)>ηj; its support is therefore in the closed ηj-neighborhood of supp⁡U, which is compactly contained in Ω because ηj<d−h. Thus it is in Cc∞(Ω;R3). By [F7], its curl is κηj∗(curl⁡U). The approximate-identity convergence [F4] applied to both U and curl⁡U gives convergence in the H(curl⁡) graph norm. Thus Ihw∈H0(curl⁡;Ω) by the closure definition.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

By [F1], curl⁡IKw is a constant vector cK on K. For each oriented face F⊂∂K, [F3] and the defining edge moments give ∫FcK⋅nF dS=∫Fcurl⁡w⋅nF dS. With c0=curl⁡w(xK), smoothness bounds the difference between the right side and ∣F∣c0⋅nF by ∣F∣hK∥D(curl⁡w)∥L∞(K). Three face normals span R3. More precisely, choose three reference faces whose unit normals form a basis. Their physical normals are normalized cofactor images under BK−T; shape regularity bounds the condition number of BK/hK, so the inverse of this three-normal matrix is uniformly bounded. Hence ∣cK−c0∣≤ChK∥D(curl⁡w)∥L∞(K) and ∥curl⁡IKw−curl⁡w∥L2(K)≤ChK5/2∥D(curl⁡w)∥L∞(K).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Shape regularity gives ∣K∣≥chK3, so ∑KhK5≤h2∑KhK3≤Ch2∣Ω∣. Squaring the local bounds in steps 1.1 and 2.1, summing over the mesh, and taking square roots gives ∥Ihw−w∥H(curl⁡;Ω)≤Cwh⟶0. The constant depends on the fixed smooth field, the domain and the mesh shape-regularity bound, but not on h.

Source notes

Chen uses the oriented edge-circulation interpolation and Stokes identity. The local estimate above derives the affine scaling and global H(curl⁡) convergence for fixed smooth compactly supported inputs; it never applies an edge moment to a general graph-space field.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources