Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pullback of the Thom class along a transverse section computes the Euler class

Statement

Assume AC. Let E→M be a smooth R-oriented rank-r numerable real vector bundle in the scope of the Thom theorem over a closed R-oriented smooth n-manifold M, let s:M→E be a smooth section transverse to the zero section with zero locus Z=s−1(0) carrying the induced orientation of Normal bundle of the zero locus of a transverse section, and let uE be the normalized Thom class of E. Choose a smooth bundle metric by Every smooth vector bundle admits a smooth bundle metric. Lift uE uniquely to u~E∈Hr(D(E),D(E)∖s0(M);R): restriction to (D(E),S(E)) is an isomorphism because the punctured fibres retract radially onto their spheres. After composing s with the fibre-radial diffeomorphism v↦v/1+∣v∣2 onto the open unit disc bundle (which fixes Z and has derivative the identity at every zero), the pair pullback s∗(u~E)∈Hr(M,M∖Z;R) is defined, and it equals the image of the normal Thom class uνZ under the tubular excision isomorphism supplied by The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold and Excision for singular cohomology. Consequently its image in Hr(M;R) is the Euler class e(E) of Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class: the relative pullback of the Thom class along any transverse section computes e(E). The zero section defines e(E) by its absolute pullback; over a nonempty base it is transverse to itself exactly in rank zero; over an empty base transversality is vacuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The R-oriented rank-r bundle E→M in the Thom scope over the closed R-oriented smooth n-manifold M, the transverse smooth section s with zero locus Z, and the normalized Thom class uE.

[F1]

Z has a tubular neighbourhood in M, i.e. a diffeomorphism from an open neighbourhood of the zero section of νZ onto an open neighbourhood of Z (The tubular neighbourhood theorem in a smooth ambient manifold).

[F2]

A normalized Thom class restricts to the chosen orientation generator on every fibre disk pair (Thom class by fiberwise normalization).

[F3]

For an orientation-preserving pullback square of bundles the Thom class pulls back to the Thom class of the pullback, and a normalized Thom class is unique (Naturality and uniqueness of Thom classes).

[F4]

Excision: if Z‾⊆int⁡XA then inclusion induces an isomorphism on relative cohomology (Excision for singular cohomology).

[F5]

The Euler class is e(ξ)=eTh(ξ):=s∗j∗(uξ), the zero-section pullback of the normalized Thom class, and it is natural for orientation-preserving pullbacks (Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class).

[F6]

The vertical part of ds induces a canonical isomorphism νZ≅E∣Z of smooth bundles over Z (Normal bundle of the zero locus of a transverse section).

Proof

technique · Thom naturality in a tube of the zero section plus homotopy invariance of absolute cohomology along the affine homotopy of sections
1.1F1givenconstruct

Pair comparison and bounding. Choose a smooth metric by Every smooth vector bundle admits a smooth bundle metric. The radial retraction of the punctured disk bundle to the sphere bundle, together with Long exact sequence of a pair in singular cohomology, makes the restriction Hr(D(E),D(E)∖s0(M);R)→Hr(D(E),S(E);R) an isomorphism. Let u~E be the inverse image of uE; in rank zero both removed subspaces are empty. Replace s by ρ∘s with ρ(v)=v/1+∣v∣2; this is smooth and lands in the open unit disc bundle, has the same zero locus Z because ρ−1(0)={0}, and dρ0=id, so transversality of s to the zero section at every point of Z is unchanged. Thus s is a map of pairs from (M,M∖Z) to (D(E),D(E)∖s0(M)), and below s∗(uE) abbreviates the precisely typed s∗(u~E). Take a tubular chart Φ:Ω⊆νZ→U from [F1]. Its vertical differential followed by the quotient qz:TzM→νZ,z gives Bz=qz∘dΦ0z∣νZ,z. Since Φ fixes Z, its tangent differential is the identity on TzZ; the invertibility of dΦ0z therefore makes Bz invertible. In local bundle coordinates its matrix consists of smooth first derivatives, and the inverse matrix is smooth by the cofactor formula. Thus B is a smooth bundle automorphism. Replace Φ by Ψ=Φ∘B−1 on B(Ω); this is a tubular chart and qz∘dΨ0z∣νZ,z=id.

1.2F2F6algebra

Local normalization. On a trivializing chart U write s(x)=(x,f(x)) with f:U→Rr, f(0)=0 and df0 surjective; Z∩U=f−1(0) and T0Z=ker⁡df0. The normalized Thom class restricts on (Dr,Sr−1) to the orientation generator [F2], so the local fibre component represents the fibre orientation class in the punctured-fibre pair; the invertible normal derivative permits computing its pullback on a small normal disk by a local diffeomorphism. Under the normal identification νZ≅E∣Z of [F6], the composite νZ,0→df0Rr is an orientation-preserving isomorphism, the vertical part of df0 being exactly the comparison defining the induced orientation; so the local generator is the normal generator. This uses a tubular chart with normal differential the identity; an arbitrary orientation-reversing fibre reparametrization would reverse the integral generator.

2.1F1F3F4F6step 1.2

Global identification. The tube of [F1] identifies a neighbourhood of Z with a neighbourhood of the zero section of νZ. On each sufficiently small normal disk at z∈Z, the fibre component of s has its only zero at z and has invertible derivative there by [F6]. Choice-free smooth inverse function theorem in Euclidean space gives a local diffeomorphism. Its differential preserves the supplied R-orientation by [F6] and the normalization in step 1.1, so its pullback carries the fibre orientation generator to the prescribed normal generator; over F2 the local degree is 1 regardless of sign. Thus step 1.2 says precisely that the relative pullback restricts to the prescribed generator on every normal fibre pair. Thom uniqueness [F3] identifies it on the tube with uνZ. Excision [F4] identifies Hr(M,M∖Z;R) with the relative cohomology of that tube and its complement of Z; choose a small metric disk subbundle inside the chart domain (possible uniformly because Z is compact), and use excision to restrict to its interior. The punctured-disk comparison from step 1.1 identifies the resulting group with Hr(D(νZ),S(νZ);R) after rescaling the metric. Hence s∗(uE) is the image of uνZ under the tubular identification.

3.1F5step 2.1algebra∎

Euler class. Let s0:M→D(E) be the zero section and uEabs=j∗uE∈Hr(D(E);R) its absolute restriction. The forget-support map Hr(M,M∖Z;R)→Hr(M;R) factors the pullback, so the image of s∗(uE) is s∗(uEabs). The affine homotopy (x,t)↦(1−t)s(x) stays inside the disc bundle and is a homotopy from s to s0 through sections, so Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology gives s∗(uEabs)=s0∗(uEabs). By [F5] this is e(E). Empty Z and rank zero follow from the same formulas; AC is inherited from the Thom and tubular suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

81 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources