Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar Cramér–Rao lower bound

Statement

Assume AC for the selected density representatives. Let Θ be an open interval, fix θ∈Θ, and let ψ:Θ→R be differentiable at θ. Let T be a real-valued estimator (Statistics and estimators) with EηT=ψ(η) on a neighborhood of θ and Eθ[T2]<∞. Let the score Sθ have EθSθ=0 and Fisher information I(θ)=EθSθ2∈(0,∞). If Cov⁡θ(T,Sθ)=ψ′(θ), then Var⁡θ(T)≥ψ′(θ)2I(θ). Equality holds exactly when T−ψ(θ)=ψ′(θ)I(θ)SθPθ-almost surely.

The covariance identity is an explicit hypothesis. One sufficient way to establish it is to assume the regularity hypotheses of Mean-zero score and the information identity on a neighborhood, together with a neighborhood V of θ, a nonnegative integrable H, and one μ-null set NH such that ∣T(x)∂ηpη(x)∣≤H(x) for every x∉NH and every η∈V. The mean value theorem and dominated convergence then differentiate EηT=∫Tpη dμ and give the covariance identity. This is only one sufficient regularity route; the bound itself does not require common support if its score and covariance identities have been established by another valid argument. The theorem's hypotheses also include every finite-variance unbiased estimator in the sense of Unbiased estimators and UMVU estimators whenever its score-covariance identity holds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; an open scalar parameter interval and a fixed θ∈Θ; a measurable real estimator T with EηT=ψ(η) locally, finite EθT2, and differentiable ψ; a score Sθ with EθSθ=0, I(θ)=EθSθ2∈(0,∞); and the score-covariance identity Cov⁡θ(T,Sθ)=ψ′(θ). Alternatively, assume the sufficient common-support density and integrable-envelope route stated above.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it supplies the density representatives used by the score definition.

[F1]

Score and Fisher information: on positive support, Sθ=∂θlog⁡pθ and I(θ)=EθSθ2.

[F2]

Mean-zero score and the information identity: under the displayed common-support and derivative-envelope hypotheses, the score has mean zero and the information identity holds.

[F3]

Statistics and estimators: an estimator is a measurable statistic with the target measurable space specified.

[F4]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: for square-integrable real random variables, variance is E[(T−ET)2] and covariance is E[(T−ET)(S−ES)].

[F5]

The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions and Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure: L2(Pθ) consists of square-integrable real functions modulo equality Pθ-almost everywhere.

[F6]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ) and A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere: expectations are linear on integrable functions, and a nonnegative function with integral zero vanishes almost everywhere.

[F7]

Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument: a real inner product is a symmetric bilinear positive-definite pairing.

[F8]

Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors: in a real inner product space, Cauchy–Schwarz holds, with equality exactly when the two vectors are linearly dependent.

[F9]

The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) and Dominated convergence: a differentiable parameter function has its difference quotient bounded by a derivative bound on the segment, and an integrable majorant permits the limit to pass through the integral.

[F10]

Likelihood densities: pη is a selected RN density representative of the sampling law.

[F12]

The measure with density f relative to μ and Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product and Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: for the density law Pη=pη dμ, the density identity holds for nonnegative g. For real integrable g, applying the nonnegative identity to g+ and g− gives the signed identity; applying it to ∣g∣ verifies that gpη is integrable.

[F13]

Unbiased estimators and UMVU estimators: unbiasedness means integrability and EηT=ψ(η) at every parameter; finite-variance unbiasedness also requires T∈L2(Pη) at every parameter.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2F3F4F6F9F10F11F12F13givenchoose

Every globally finite-variance unbiased estimator in [F13] satisfies the theorem's local mean and second-moment hypotheses. For the stated broader class, if the score-covariance identity is assumed directly, it is already available. Under the sufficient density route, linearity [F6] and [F12] give ψ(θ+hn)−ψ(θ)hn=∫T(x)pθ+hn(x)−pθ(x)hn dμ. The mean value theorem [F9] bounds the integrand by the common integrable envelope outside NH; its pointwise limit is T(x)∂θpθ(x). Dominated convergence [F9] therefore gives ψ′(θ)=∫T ∂θpθ dμ. On the common positive support, [F1] gives ∂θpθ=pθSθ. The product TSθ is integrable by 2∣TSθ∣≤T2+Sθ2. By [F10], [F11], and [F12], Pθ=pθ dμ and ∫T∂θpθ dμ=Eθ[TSθ]. Since EθSθ=0 by [F2] and EθT=ψ(θ), [F4] identifies this with Cov⁡θ(T,Sθ). Thus either allowed route supplies the covariance identity.

2.1F4F5F6F7step 1.1givenalgebra

Put U=T−ψ(θ). The Pθ-almost-everywhere classes of U and Sθ lie in L2(Pθ) by [F4]–[F5]. Their product is integrable since 2∣USθ∣≤U2+Sθ2. Expectation linearity [F6] and EθSθ=0 give ⟨U,Sθ⟩:=Eθ[USθ]=Cov⁡θ(T,Sθ)=ψ′(θ). The pairing ⟨V,W⟩=Eθ[VW] is an inner product on these classes: symmetry and bilinearity follow from [F6], and positive definiteness follows from [F6].

3.1F4F8step 2.1givenalgebra

By Cauchy–Schwarz [F8] in this real inner product space, ψ′(θ)2=∣⟨U,Sθ⟩∣2≤⟨U,U⟩⟨Sθ,Sθ⟩=Var⁡θ(T)I(θ). Divide by I(θ)>0 to obtain the stated lower bound.

4.1F8step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

Since I(θ)>0, equality in step 3.1 holds exactly when the L2(Pθ) classes of U and Sθ are linearly dependent [F8]. Taking their inner product with Sθ and using step 2.1 fixes the coefficient as ψ′(θ)/I(θ); conversely that relation gives equality by direct substitution. This is precisely the asserted almost-sure equality condition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources