How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Scores and Information Bounds
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Conditional Distributions and Regular Conditional Probability
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Domination and Likelihood Ratios
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Estimators and Randomized Procedures
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite-Sample Point Estimation
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Loss, Risk and Decision Theory
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Statistical Experiments, Models and Identifiability
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page defines the score and Fisher information for a dominated parameterized model, then proves the mean-zero score and expected log-likelihood Hessian identities under explicit common-support and integrable-envelope conditions. Those conditions give one sufficient differentiation-under-the-integral route; they are not a claim that all valid information bounds require common support.
The scalar bound applies to estimators with the stated local mean, finite second moment at the chosen parameter, and score-covariance derivative identity. The vector bound states its pointwise mean and score-derivative conditions separately, then proves the covariance inequality by expanding a residual vector's covariance. These hypotheses include globally finite-variance unbiased estimators when the required score identities hold; neither theorem asserts that an estimator attaining a bound exists.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Score and Fisher information
Definition
Let be a statistical experiment dominated by a fixed sigma-finite positive measure , and let be selected finite-valued measurable Radon–Nikodym density representatives as in Likelihood densities. The simultaneous selection of this arbitrary-index family uses the Axiom of Choice. No measurability of or common exceptional null set for an arbitrary uncountable is implied.
Let be open in , and fix a parameter at which the selected family is differentiable for -almost every , with measurable coordinate derivatives. On , define the log-likelihood and the score Set where , which is -null. For , this is .
For , the scalar Fisher information is When and is square-integrable, the Fisher information matrix is ; its entry is . No scalar information is defined here for a vector parameter. The information matrix is a second-moment matrix by definition; it equals the score covariance matrix when the score has mean zero.
The derivatives, score and information are defined relative to the specified differentiable representative family. The Radon–Nikodym definition alone does not supply parameter differentiability or a canonical score version.
Mean-zero score and the information identity
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice for the selected density representatives. Let be open in , let be a fixed sigma-finite dominating measure, and let be the selected densities of a statistical model. Fix . Suppose that on a neighborhood of there are a fixed measurable support and a -null set such that, for every , and has continuous first and second partial derivatives on ; outside , for all . Suppose there are nonnegative that uniformly dominate every first partial derivative and every second partial derivative, respectively, on . Also assume .
Then , and, entrywise, For a scalar parameter this reads and .
This common-support, integrable-envelope setup is sufficient, not necessary: the theorem does not claim that every model with valid score identities must have common support or these envelopes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; open; a fixed sigma-finite dominating measure ; a selected density family ; a fixed support and common null set on a neighborhood ; pointwise continuous first and second partial derivatives on ; integrable uniform envelopes for those derivatives; and a finite second moment of the score.
The Axiom of Choice: AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; here it supplies the simultaneous family of density representatives.
Dominated statistical experiments: every sampling law is dominated by the fixed sigma-finite positive measure .
Likelihood densities: is a selected measurable Radon–Nikodym representative of .
The measure with density relative to and Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product: if , then for nonnegative . For real integrable , apply this identity to and ; applying it first to shows is integrable, so the signed identity follows from the definition of the signed integral.
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with : for a differentiable function on an interval, the difference quotient between two endpoints equals its derivative at an intermediate point.
Dominated convergence: pointwise almost-everywhere convergence under one integrable majorant implies convergence of the integrals.
Score and Fisher information: on , the score is and the information matrix has entries .
The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , and The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: on the positive support, and .
Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable and Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: expectations are integrals and signed expectations require integrability.
The Lebesgue integral is linear on : for integrable functions, the integral commutes with differences and scalar multiplication.
Proof
By [F2]–[F4], every selected density has . Fix a coordinate and a sequence with . For almost every , the mean value theorem [F6] bounds by , and the quotient converges to . Dominated convergence [F7] therefore gives convergence of the quotient integrals. Linearity [F11] shows each quotient integral is , so . Since and is a probability, is integrable (use ). On , the signed density identity [F5] and [F8] identify with this integral; outside the law is zero. Thus every score coordinate has mean zero.
For any coordinates , apply the same sequence argument to . The mean value theorem bounds its difference quotient by , so [F7] interchanges this derivative and the integral. Step 1.1 holds at every parameter in , hence throughout ; linearity [F11] turns each difference-quotient integral into the difference of these zero integrals. Dominated convergence then gives .
On , differentiate using [F9]. Multiplying the Hessian formula by , integrating with the signed density identity [F5] and linearity [F11], and using step 2.1 yields . The terms are integrable: , and .
The coordinate identities in step 3.1 give the asserted matrix identity; when they give the scalar identity. Step 1.1 supplies the score mean-zero claim in both cases.
Scalar Cramér–Rao lower bound
Statement
Assume AC for the selected density representatives. Let be an open interval, fix , and let be differentiable at . Let be a real-valued estimator (Statistics and estimators) with on a neighborhood of and . Let the score have and Fisher information . If then Equality holds exactly when
The covariance identity is an explicit hypothesis. One sufficient way to establish it is to assume the regularity hypotheses of Mean-zero score and the information identity on a neighborhood, together with a neighborhood of , a nonnegative integrable , and one -null set such that for every and every . The mean value theorem and dominated convergence then differentiate and give the covariance identity. This is only one sufficient regularity route; the bound itself does not require common support if its score and covariance identities have been established by another valid argument. The theorem's hypotheses also include every finite-variance unbiased estimator in the sense of Unbiased estimators and UMVU estimators whenever its score-covariance identity holds.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; an open scalar parameter interval and a fixed ; a measurable real estimator with locally, finite , and differentiable ; a score with , ; and the score-covariance identity . Alternatively, assume the sufficient common-support density and integrable-envelope route stated above.
The Axiom of Choice: AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it supplies the density representatives used by the score definition.
Score and Fisher information: on positive support, and .
Mean-zero score and the information identity: under the displayed common-support and derivative-envelope hypotheses, the score has mean zero and the information identity holds.
Statistics and estimators: an estimator is a measurable statistic with the target measurable space specified.
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: for square-integrable real random variables, variance is and covariance is .
The space as the quotient by null functions and Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure: consists of square-integrable real functions modulo equality -almost everywhere.
The Lebesgue integral is linear on and A nonnegative measurable function has integral exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere: expectations are linear on integrable functions, and a nonnegative function with integral zero vanishes almost everywhere.
Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument: a real inner product is a symmetric bilinear positive-definite pairing.
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors: in a real inner product space, Cauchy–Schwarz holds, with equality exactly when the two vectors are linearly dependent.
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with and Dominated convergence: a differentiable parameter function has its difference quotient bounded by a derivative bound on the segment, and an integrable majorant permits the limit to pass through the integral.
Likelihood densities: is a selected RN density representative of the sampling law.
A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density: the selected RN density satisfies .
The measure with density relative to and Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product and Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: for the density law , the density identity holds for nonnegative . For real integrable , applying the nonnegative identity to and gives the signed identity; applying it to verifies that is integrable.
Unbiased estimators and UMVU estimators: unbiasedness means integrability and at every parameter; finite-variance unbiasedness also requires at every parameter.
Proof
Every globally finite-variance unbiased estimator in [F13] satisfies the theorem's local mean and second-moment hypotheses. For the stated broader class, if the score-covariance identity is assumed directly, it is already available. Under the sufficient density route, linearity [F6] and [F12] give The mean value theorem [F9] bounds the integrand by the common integrable envelope outside ; its pointwise limit is . Dominated convergence [F9] therefore gives . On the common positive support, [F1] gives . The product is integrable by . By [F10], [F11], and [F12], and . Since by [F2] and , [F4] identifies this with . Thus either allowed route supplies the covariance identity.
Put . The -almost-everywhere classes of and lie in by [F4]–[F5]. Their product is integrable since . Expectation linearity [F6] and give . The pairing is an inner product on these classes: symmetry and bilinearity follow from [F6], and positive definiteness follows from [F6].
By Cauchy–Schwarz [F8] in this real inner product space, . Divide by to obtain the stated lower bound.
Since , equality in step 3.1 holds exactly when the classes of and are linearly dependent [F8]. Taking their inner product with and using step 2.1 fixes the coefficient as ; conversely that relation gives equality by direct substitution. This is precisely the asserted almost-sure equality condition.
Multivariate Cramér–Rao bound
Statement
Assume AC for the selected density representatives. Let be open and fix . Let be a measurable estimator (Statistics and estimators) with finite second moments and coordinatewise (this is the meaning of unbiasedness here), where is differentiable at . Let the score vector be square-integrable, have mean zero, and have nonsingular information matrix . Assume the vector score-derivative identity where is the Jacobian matrix with entries . Then Here means for every , and is the matrix whose entry is . The mean-zero and score-derivative identities are explicit hypotheses; common support with suitable derivative-interchange conditions is one sufficient regular route, not the only possible route. If each coordinate is a finite-variance unbiased estimator of the real estimand in the sense of Unbiased estimators and UMVU estimators, then satisfies the pointwise mean and moment premises; the score-derivative identity remains a separate condition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; an open -dimensional parameter set; a measurable -valued estimator with finite second moments and mean ; a square-integrable score vector with mean zero and nonsingular ; the vector derivative identity; and the stated quadratic-form definition of .
The Axiom of Choice: AC supplies the arbitrary-index family of selected density representatives used by the score.
Score and Fisher information: the score is the gradient of the log density and has entries .
Mean-zero score and the information identity: under its regularity hypotheses, the score mean is zero and the information matrix is its second-moment matrix.
Statistics and estimators: an estimator is a measurable statistic with its target measurable space specified.
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: covariance is the expectation of centered coordinate products; for a vector, this defines the covariance matrix entrywise.
Expectation of a nonnegative or integrable random variable: expectation is integration against the sampling probability measure.
Unbiased estimators and UMVU estimators, applied to each real coordinate: if is finite-variance unbiased for , then and at every parameter.
The Lebesgue integral is linear on : expectation is linear on integrable real random variables. Finite second moments imply first moments on a probability space (use ), and all products of coordinates in the covariance expansion are integrable by .
Proof
Applying [F6] to each coordinate of a globally finite-variance unbiased vector estimator shows that it satisfies the theorem's pointwise mean and moment premises; the score-derivative identity is separately assumed. Define . The stated mean assumptions and expectation linearity [F7] give , so .
Expand the residual covariance using expectation linearity [F7], , , and . The products are integrable by the coordinate bound in [F7]. Since is symmetric and nonsingular, is symmetric, and matrix multiplication yields
For every , . By the definition of in the Statement and step 2.1, this is exactly .
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- George Deligiannidis, SB2.1 Foundations of Statistical Inference, §3.1–3.2, PDF pp. 21–24
- Peter Kempthorne, MIT 18.655 Lecture 13: Unbiased Estimation and Risk Inequalities, PDF pp. 6–8, 16–17
- George Deligiannidis, SB2.1 Foundations of Statistical Inference, §3.1–3.2, Theorems 3.4 and 3.7, PDF pp. 21–24
- George Deligiannidis, SB2.1 Foundations of Statistical Inference, Theorem 5.3 and proof, PDF pp. 29–31
- Peter Kempthorne, MIT 18.655 Lecture 13: Unbiased Estimation and Risk Inequalities, Theorem 3.4.1 and proof, PDF pp. 10–11
- George Deligiannidis, SB2.1 Foundations of Statistical Inference, Theorem 5.9 and proof sketch, PDF pp. 32–33
- Peter Kempthorne, MIT 18.655 Lecture 13: Unbiased Estimation and Risk Inequalities, Theorems 3.4.3–3.4.4, PDF pp. 18–19