How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite left exact functors are Hom functors with dual bimodule kernels
Statement
Throughout, a bimodule over -algebras means a -vector space with -bilinear commuting actions and agreeing scalar actions: for in a -bimodule. This compatibility is an additional requirement beyond the ring-bimodule definition -bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions.
For assertions forming categories of functors, fix a set of allowed finite-dimensional -vector space structures containing and the underlying spaces of the algebras considered, and closed under finite biproducts, subspaces, quotients, -tensor products, -duals and spaces of linear maps. Allow every compatible algebra, module and bimodule structure on these spaces. The resulting module categories are small, so their functors and natural transformations are set-coded as required by Functor category . The objectwise formulas apply without this size restriction; no category of proper-class functors is asserted.
Let be finite-dimensional unital algebras over a field . Let be the regular bimodule and let be its -dual with the commuting actions and , regarded as a left -module. Let be a -linear left exact functor and put with the right -action ; then is a finite-dimensional -bimodule. There is a natural isomorphism of left -modules
for every finite-dimensional left -module , where is the -bimodule dual to and the left -action on the Hom is ; the isomorphism is natural in . Consequently is an equivalence of categories between finite-dimensional -bimodules with bimodule maps and -linear left exact functors with all natural transformations, with quasi-inverse . No commutativity of or and no choice are used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The scalar and size conventions above, a field , finite-dimensional unital -algebras and , the -dual of the regular bimodule with the commuting actions displayed in the statement, and a -linear left exact functor on finite-dimensional left modules.
Duality is a contravariant -linear functor on finite-dimensional modules, exact, with naturally; it is a contravariant equivalence between finite-dimensional left -modules and finite-dimensional left -modules, and between finite-dimensional -bimodules and finite-dimensional -bimodules, and it carries the left/right module structures into one another (Finite module duality is exact with commuting bimodule actions, The opposite ring , Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).
Every -linear right exact functor between finite-dimensional module categories over finite-dimensional algebras is naturally isomorphic to for the bimodule kernel , and the assignment is an equivalence with quasi-inverse (Finite Eilenberg–Watts for right exact linear functors).
If is an -bimodule with compatible -actions, each right multiplication is left -linear. For a -linear , the formulas give a right -action on commuting with its left -action. Indeed , , and ; the agreeing -actions follow from ( is a -bimodule for every additive functor , -bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions).
Tensor-hom adjunction: for a -bimodule , a left -module and a -vector space , a -linear map corresponds naturally to an -linear map ; equivalently, a balanced -bilinear pairing out of induces a unique map out of the tensor product (Tensor-Hom adjunction for bimodules over arbitrary unital rings, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).
A functor is left exact when it preserves every finite limit, in particular kernels, and right exact when it preserves finite colimits, in particular cokernels (Left exact and right exact functors).
The Yoneda lemma identifies natural transformations with elements of ; concretely, a natural transformation between represented functors is determined by, and determined as precomposition with, a map (The Yoneda bijection is natural in both and ).
For a finite-dimensional -bimodule , tensor-Hom adjunction gives , restricting to finite-dimensional modules because both tensor products and Hom-spaces remain finite-dimensional. Hence preserves finite limits and is left exact; it is -linear by postcomposition and the agreeing scalar actions (Tensor-Hom adjunction for bimodules over arbitrary unital rings, Right adjoints preserve every limit that exists, k-linear categories and k-linear functors).
Proof
The -dual with the actions and is a finite-dimensional -bimodule (the actions commute by associativity of multiplication in ), and is left -linear for each , since . Hence is defined on and, by [F3] applied to the bimodule in place of the regular module, is a finite-dimensional -bimodule, the right action being .
Define for finite-dimensional left -modules (equivalently right -modules): is a finite-dimensional left -module by [F1], so is in and its dual is a left -module, so is a functor , -linear by [F1]. It is right exact: if is exact, then dualizing gives the exact sequence by exactness of the duality [F1], left exactness of gives , and dualizing again gives the exact sequence .
By [F2] applied to the finite-dimensional algebras and , the right exact -linear functor is naturally isomorphic to with kernel , a finite-dimensional -bimodule. The dual of the regular left -module is with the left -action of step 1.1, so under the identifications of [F1]; thus is the -bimodule dual of .
For double duality of [F1] gives , and step 2.1 gives ; hence , naturally in .
There is a natural left -module isomorphism . Here is a left -module and right -module, and is regarded as a right -module by ; is a left -module by . For -linear , the pairing is balanced since . Conversely a functional defines into , and balancing makes this map -linear. These constructions are inverse, -linear and natural in . The tensor product carries a right -action , so its dual has left action . This corresponds to , proving -linearity.
Combining steps 3.1 and 3.2 gives a natural isomorphism of left -modules for every finite-dimensional left -module , with a finite-dimensional -bimodule by step 1.1.
(Equivalence on hom-categories.) The assignment lands in -linear left exact functors by [F7]. For finite-dimensional -bimodules , a natural transformation with -linear components corresponds by the Yoneda computation [F6] to the map , which is -linear by construction and right -linear: naturality at gives , while -linearity of gives ; conversely every -bimodule map gives such a natural transformation by precomposition. By the bimodule duality [F1] these correspond bijectively to -bimodule maps ; so the assignment is full and faithful. It is essentially surjective by step 4.1: every -linear left exact is naturally isomorphic to with a -bimodule. Hence the assignment is an equivalence of categories, and it has quasi-inverse : on objects this returns up to the isomorphism of step 4.1, and on morphisms it sends a natural transformation to its component at , a -bimodule map by naturality against the right-action maps of . The other composite is naturally isomorphic to : sends to the unique with for every , using double duality. Its inverse sends to ; these formulas respect both actions and are natural in .
Steps 1.1, 4.1 and 5.1 prove the statement: is a finite-dimensional -bimodule, naturally in , and is an equivalence with quasi-inverse . No commutativity of or was used, and all dualities, tensor products and presentations involved are finite-dimensional, so no choice is used.
Depends on
- Right adjoints preserve every limit that exists
- Functor category $[\mathcal C,\mathcal D]$
- Linear functionals and the algebraic dual $V^*=\mathcal L(V,F)$
- $(S,R)$-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- Equivalence, quasi-inverse, and adjoint equivalence of categories
- Exact sequences and short exact sequences of modules
- Covariant functor, identity functor, composite functor, and contravariant functor
- k-linear categories and k-linear functors
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Left exact and right exact functors
- Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel
- Natural isomorphism
- Natural transformation and its components
- The opposite ring $R^{\mathrm{op}}$
- The space $\mathcal L(V,W)$ of linear maps with pointwise addition and scalar multiplication
- $F(A)$ is a $(B,A)$-bimodule for every additive functor $F$
- Finite module duality is exact with commuting bimodule actions
- Tensor-Hom adjunction for bimodules over arbitrary unital rings
- Finite Eilenberg–Watts for right exact linear functors
- Modules over a ring form an abelian category
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
- The Yoneda bijection $\operatorname{Nat}(\mathcal C(a,-),F)\cong F(a)$ is natural in both $a$ and $F$
Used by
- Exact finite tensor functors have projective right-module kernels Corollary
- Finite one-sided exactness is equivalent to the existence of the corresponding adjoint Corollary
- The dual-numbers tensor functor is right exact but not left exact Example
- Categorical Eilenberg–Watts equivalences for finite linear categories Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §1.8 (Definitions 1.8.1–1.8.6, Proposition 1.8.10, Corollary 1.8.11, Remark 1.8.7), printed pp.9–11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fuchs, Schaumann, Schweigert, Eilenberg–Watts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S^4 theorem, arXiv:1612.04561v3, §2.1 (Lemma 2.1 (L1)-(L3), equation (2.1)) (standard reference, not scraped)