How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact finite tensor functors have projective right-module kernels
Statement
Throughout, a bimodule over -algebras means a -vector space with -bilinear commuting actions and agreeing scalar actions: for in a -bimodule. This compatibility is an additional requirement beyond the ring-bimodule definition -bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions.
Let be finite-dimensional unital algebras over a field and let be a finite-dimensional -bimodule with associated tensor functor . Then the following are equivalent: (1) is exact on finite-dimensional left -modules, equivalently is flat as a right -module; (2) is a projective right -module. Since is finite-dimensional, (2) is also equivalent to being a direct summand of a finite free right -module and to being finitely generated and projective. No choice is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The agreeing scalar convention above, a field , finite-dimensional unital -algebras , and a finite-dimensional -bimodule , with .
A right -module is flat exactly when is exact on left -modules; every projective right -module is flat, without choice (Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring, Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring).
The choice-free direction of the projective-module characterizations produces, from the canonical free cover, an identification of a projective module with a direct summand of a free module; for a finitely generated module the cover may be taken over a finite generating set, so the free module is finite; conversely a direct summand of a free module whose basis is finite is projective, since lifts of the finitely many basis elements can be chosen (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules, Projective modules and the lifting property, Every module is a quotient of a free module, Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).
For a -bimodule and finite-dimensional left -modules , duality and the tensor-hom adjunction give a natural isomorphism of left -modules: a functional corresponds to , and the balancing relation for is exactly -linearity of that map, because denotes the right -action on and the right -action on (Finite left exact functors are Hom functors with dual bimodule kernels, Finite module duality is exact with commuting bimodule actions, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups, Tensor-Hom adjunction for bimodules over arbitrary unital rings).
Duality is an exact contravariant equivalence between finite-dimensional left -modules and finite-dimensional left -modules, so a functor on one side is exact exactly when the corresponding functor on the other side is (Finite module duality is exact with commuting bimodule actions).
The category is abelian; a finite-dimensional left -module is finitely generated, and a finite-dimensional right -module has a finite free cover built from a finite -basis (Modules over a ring form an abelian category, Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension ; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis, Every module is a quotient of a free module, Universal property of a direct sum of modules, The direct sum of an indexed family of modules).
If is a direct summand of the free right module with inclusion and retraction , then is projective: given a surjection and , lift by choosing preimages under of the images of its finitely many basis vectors; precomposing the resulting lift with lifts (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules, Projective modules and the lifting property, The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules, Split monomorphism, split epimorphism, retraction, and section).
Proof
(2)(1). If is a projective right -module, then is flat by [F1], that is, is exact on left -modules; restricting to finite-dimensional left modules, is exact on . Equivalently, is a direct summand of a free right module by [F2], tensoring with a free module is a direct sum of copies of the identity, and a direct summand of an exact functor is exact.
((1), transport of exactness.) Suppose is exact on finite-dimensional left -modules. By [F3] there are natural isomorphisms for finite-dimensional left -modules ; since is an exact contravariant equivalence between and by [F4], exactness of on the finite left modules is equivalent to exactness of on the finite right -modules.
((1)(2), the cover splits.) Keep the hypothesis of step 1.2. Since is finite-dimensional it is finitely generated as a right -module, so a finite -basis of induces a surjection of right -modules by [F5]. Exactness of at this surjection gives that is surjective, so the identity of lifts to with ; hence is a direct summand of the finite free right -module , and is projective by [F6].
The finite-generation clause: a finite-dimensional module is finitely generated by [F5]; conversely a finitely generated projective right module is a direct summand of a finite free module by [F2], giving the stated equivalences. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove (2)(1) and (1)(2), so the exactness of , the flatness of , the projectivity of , and the finite-summand and finite-generation conditions are all equivalent.
All covers, bases and summands used above are finite (they come from finite -bases of finite-dimensional modules), and no commutativity of or was used, so no choice is used.
Depends on
- Every module is a quotient of a free module
- $(S,R)$-bimodules and commuting left and right scalar actions
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
- The direct sum of an indexed family of modules
- Exact functor between abelian categories
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
- The abelian group $\operatorname{Hom}_R(M,N)$ and maps induced by pre- and postcomposition
- Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Left exact and right exact functors
- Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel
- Projective modules and the lifting property
- Split monomorphism, split epimorphism, retraction, and section
- Finite module duality is exact with commuting bimodule actions
- Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring
- Tensor-Hom adjunction for bimodules over arbitrary unital rings
- Finite left exact functors are Hom functors with dual bimodule kernels
- Modules over a ring form an abelian category
- Equivalent characterizations of projective modules
- The splitting lemma for short exact sequences of modules
- Universal property of a direct sum of modules
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, §1.8 (Definitions 1.8.1–1.8.6, Proposition 1.8.10, Corollary 1.8.11, Remark 1.8.7), printed pp.9–11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fuchs, Schaumann, Schweigert, Eilenberg–Watts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S^4 theorem, arXiv:1612.04561v3, §2.1 (Lemma 2.1 (L1)-(L3), equation (2.1)) (standard reference, not scraped)