How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is an isomorphism
Statement
is an isomorphism. Its inverse is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The degree function on based loop classes of the quotient circle.
is a group homomorphism ( is a group homomorphism).
Two based circle loops are path-homotopic if and only if they have equal degree (Two based circle loops are path-homotopic if and only if they have equal degree).
for every integer ( for every integer ).
An isomorphism is a bijective group homomorphism (Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set ).
The integers form a commutative ring, and hence is a group (The integers form a commutative ring).
consists of endpoint-fixed path-homotopy classes of based loops (Based loops and the fundamental group).
Proof
By [L1], is a group homomorphism into the additive group of integers supplied by [L5].
If , then , so [L2] makes and path-homotopic. Their classes are equal by [L6], and is injective.
Let . By [L3], , so every integer is attained and is surjective. This includes , , and negative integers.
Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 show that is a bijective group homomorphism, hence an isomorphism by [L4]. Step 1.3 also shows that is its inverse, since injectivity makes this preimage unique.
Depends on
- $\operatorname{Deg}:\pi_1(S^1,[0])\to(\mathbb Z,+)$ is a group homomorphism
- Two based circle loops are path-homotopic if and only if they have equal degree
- $\deg(\omega_n)=n$ for every integer $n$
- Based loops and the fundamental group
- Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set $\operatorname{Aut}(G)$
- The integers form a commutative ring
Used by
- Connected coverings of the circle are classified by the subgroups nℤ for n≥0 Corollary
- Every connected covering of the circle is regular Corollary
- The trigonometric loops give π₁({(x,y):x²+y²=1},(1,0))≅ℤ Corollary
- π₁(T²)≅ℤ×ℤ Corollary
- A complete manifold with zero global injectivity radius Counterexample
- A homology equivalence need not be a homotopy equivalence without simple connectivity Counterexample
- Ignoring monodromy gives the wrong Serre E2 page Counterexample
- Deck groups of connected circle coverings: ℤ/nℤ for n≥1 and ℤ for the universal cover Example
- Mapping cone of a degree d circle map Example
- Oriented two-plane bundles over the two-sphere by winding number Example
- Sign local system on real projective space Example
- π₁(ℝ²∖{0})≅ℤ Example
- FALSE: the two-set van Kampen conclusion needs no path-connectedness hypothesis on the overlap False statement
- Circle and path-loop models for Eilenberg–Mac Lane induction Lemma
- The boundary label of a van Kampen diagram is trivial in the presented group Lemma
- The fundamental group of a finite wedge of circles is free of that rank Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Ch. 1, Section 1.1, Theorem 1.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Peter May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, Ch. 1, Section 5 (standard reference, not scraped)