Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Euclidean Radon normal operator and inversion formula

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let μ be the polar surface measure on S1, defined on Borel E⊆S1 by μ(E):=2λ2({rθ:θ∈E, 0<r≤1}), where λ2 is Lebesgue measure on R2. For continuous g:S1×R→C for which the integral exists, define its backprojection by R∗g(x):=∫S1g(θ,x⋅θ) dμ(θ). For every f∈Cc∞(R2;C) and every x∈R2, the normal-operator and filtered-backprojection identities hold: R∗Rf(x)=4π∣D∣−1f(x),f(x)=14πR∗∣Ds∣Rf(x), with ∣D∣−1 and ∣Ds∣ as defined for the compact-support Fourier convention in the Euclidean Radon transform definition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice and f∈Cc∞(R2;C).

[A1]

Countable Choice, written ACω, means every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

The Euclidean Radon transform on R²: Rf is the line integral of f in the θ⊥ direction; ∣Ds∣ has multiplier 2π∣σ∣ and ∣D∣−1 has multiplier (2π∣ξ∣)−1 in the inverse Fourier integral.

[F2]

The Fourier-slice identity for the Euclidean Radon transform: for compactly supported smooth f, Rf^(θ,σ)=f^(σθ) for every θ∈S1 and σ∈R.

[F3]

The polar surface set function on the unit sphere: under Countable Choice, the polar surface set function on S1 is μ(E)=2λ2({rθ:θ∈E, 0<r≤1}) for Borel E.

[F4]

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma: under Countable Choice, μ is a finite Borel measure and ∫R2h(ξ) dλ2(ξ)=∫0∞∫S1h(rθ)r dμ(θ) dr for every nonnegative Borel h.

[F5]

A linear map T of Rn sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) when T is invertible and T[E] Lebesgue null when it is not: under Countable Choice, for every n≥1 an invertible linear map T:Rn→Rn satisfies λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣λn(E) for every Lebesgue measurable E.

[F6]

Fourier transform acts continuously on Schwartz space: under Countable Choice, the negative-sign 2π Fourier transform maps S(Rn) continuously to itself.

[F7]

Fourier inversion on Schwartz space: under Countable Choice, u(x)=∫Rnu^(ξ)e2πix⋅ξ dξ for every u∈S(Rn), with absolute convergence.

[F8]

Riemann–Lebesgue comparison for distribution test integrands: under Countable Choice, the compact-support Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree for smooth compactly supported test integrands and their bounded Borel zero extensions.

[F9]

Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product: absolutely integrable complex functions on sigma-finite product measure spaces have equal product and iterated integrals.

[F10]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ): the Lebesgue integral is complex-linear on L1.

[F11]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): for a real differentiable G on [a,b] with integrable derivative, including one-sided endpoint derivatives, ∫abG′=G(b)−G(a).

[F12]

The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a): totally differentiable finite-dimensional real maps satisfy D(g∘T)=Dg(T)∘DT. For a linear T, its derivative is constant; repeated application to the real and imaginary parts of a smooth function gives all directional derivatives of their compositions.

[F13]

A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set: every continuous real function on a compact Jordan set, in particular [0,1], is Riemann integrable.

[F14]
[F15]

Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps: if T preserves a measure ν, then integrals of integrable real or complex functions are invariant under composition with T.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F4F6F7F8F11F12F13choose

Since f∈Cc∞(R2), it is a Schwartz function. Choose R>0 with supp⁡f⊂BR(0). For every θ∈S1 and s∈R, the integrand f(sθ+tθ⊥) vanishes for ∣t∣>R, because ∣sθ+tθ⊥∣2=s2+t2. Thus the line integral is over the fixed interval [−R,R]. On every bounded s-interval, (θ,s,t)↦f(sθ+tθ⊥) is uniformly continuous on the compact parameter product with S1 and [−R,R], so its integral is jointly continuous in (θ,s). For fixed θ, write f=fR+ifI and Fν(s,t)=fν(sθ+tθ⊥) for ν∈{R,I}. The inner coordinate map is linear with constant derivative, so repeated use of [F12] gives ∂skFν(s,t)=(θ⋅∇)kfν(sθ+tθ⊥) for every k. Apply [F11] on [0,1] to each real function u↦∂skFν(s+uh,t): by [F12] its derivative is h ∂sk+1Fν(s+uh,t), which is continuous and Riemann integrable by [F13], including at the endpoints. Dividing the resulting identity by any nonzero h gives the difference quotient as the u-integral of ∂sk+1Fν(s+uh,t). Uniform continuity on each compact (s,t) rectangle makes this converge uniformly in t∈[−R,R]; integrating and recombining the two real components therefore gives ∂skRf(θ,s)=∫−RR(θ⋅∇)kf(sθ+tθ⊥) dt for every k≥0, with each derivative continuous. Also Rf(θ,s)=0 for ∣s∣>R, so Rf(θ,⋅)∈Cc∞(R;C) and is Schwartz. For every x, joint continuity makes θ↦Rf(θ,x⋅θ) continuous; [F4] makes μ finite, so the defining backprojection integral exists. By [F6] and [F7], the Lebesgue Fourier transforms of f and Rf(θ,⋅) are Schwartz and satisfy pointwise inversion; [F8] identifies them with the compact-support Riemann transforms in [F1]. Also ∣f^(ξ)∣≤∫∣f∣, and [F4] shows ∣ξ∣−1f^(ξ) is integrable near 0; outside the unit disk it is dominated by the integrable Schwartz function ∣f^∣. Rapid decay of f^ and finiteness of μ make the later signed-frequency integrals absolutely convergent.

2.1F2F4F7F9F14step 1.1

Apply [F7] to Rf(θ,⋅) at s=x⋅θ, then substitute the slice identity [F2] to get Rf(θ,x⋅θ)=∫Rf^(σθ)e2πiσx⋅θ dσ. By [F4], μ is finite, and by [F14] Lebesgue measure on R is sigma-finite, so the measure spaces in [F9] are sigma-finite. The integrand is continuous; since f^ is Schwartz, ∣f^(σθ)∣≤CN(1+∣σ∣)−N uniformly in θ, and choosing N>1 shows it is absolutely integrable on their product. Thus [F9] permits either order of integration and gives R∗Rf(x)=∫S1∫Rf^(σθ)e2πiσx⋅θ dσ dμ(θ).

3.1F1F3F4F5F10F15step 2.1

The polar definition [F3] and change of variables [F5] imply μ(−E)=μ(E) for every Borel E⊆S1, since the cone of −E is the image under −I of the cone of E and ∣det⁡(−I)∣=1. Thus θ↦−θ preserves μ. The reflection σ↦−σ preserves Lebesgue measure by [F5] in dimension one. Both maps are Borel, so [F15] permits these substitutions in the integrable angular and frequency integrands. Split the σ-integral in step 2.1 at zero and use r=−σ and θ↦−θ on its negative half to obtain twice the positive-half integral. Apply [F4] to h(ξ)=f^(ξ)e2πix⋅ξ/∣ξ∣, set to zero at ξ=0; for complex h, apply the nonnegative formula to positive and negative real and imaginary parts and use [F10]. Thus R∗Rf(x)=2∫R2f^(ξ)e2πix⋅ξ∣ξ∣−1dλ2(ξ)=4π∣D∣−1f(x).

4.1F1F2F4F7F9F10step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

By [F1] and [F2], ∣Ds∣Rf(θ,s)=∫R2π∣σ∣f^(σθ)e2πisσ dσ. Schwartz decay gives a bound ∣f^(σθ)∣≤CN(1+∣σ∣)−N uniform in θ. On each compact parameter set S1×[−A,A], the truncated integrals over bounded σ-intervals are continuous in (θ,s), while the displayed bound makes their tails uniformly tend to zero; hence the filtered data are jointly continuous. The same bound gives absolute convergence and boundedness, so finiteness of μ makes the backprojection integral exist. For fixed x, the product integrand 2π∣σ∣f^(σθ)e2πiσx⋅θ is continuous and absolutely integrable by the same bound with N>2. The measure spaces are sigma-finite as established in step 2.1; Fubini [F9], the signed-frequency split in step 3.1, and [F4] give R∗∣Ds∣Rf(x)=4π∫R2f^(ξ)e2πix⋅ξdλ2(ξ)=4πf(x) by [F7].

5.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra∎

Step 3.1 is the normal-operator identity, and dividing step 4.1 by 4π gives the filtered-backprojection identity. Both hold pointwise for every x∈R2.

Remarks

The only choice principle used is Countable Choice, through the stated Fourier, polar-measure, and compact Riemann/Lebesgue suppliers. The proof does not use the stronger AC+DC hypotheses of the general LCA inversion and Plancherel theorems.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

117 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources