Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pointwise second-order bias of the KDE

Statement

Assume ACω. Let X1,…,Xn be iid with a Borel probability density version f on Rd. Let K:Rd→R be Borel with K∈L1∩L2, ∫K(u)du=1, ∫ujK(u)du=0 for each j, and ∫∣K(u)∣∥u∥2du<∞. Suppose f has continuous second partial derivatives and a globally bounded continuous Hessian. At each fixed x∈Rd, as h↓0, Ef^h(x)−f(x)=h22∑j,k=1dμjk ∂jkf(x)+o(h2),μjk:=∫RdujukK(u)du. Here r(h)=o(h2) means r(h)/h2→0 as h↓0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, d,n≥1, iid Xi with density version f, a normalized kernel K with the stated integrability and moment conditions, fixed x, and h>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The kernel estimate is (nhd)−1∑iK((x−Xi)/h); the density version is nonnegative, Borel and integrates to one (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

Each fixed-x evaluation is a measurable real statistic (Each fixed-point KDE evaluation is a statistic).

[F3]

A nonnegative C2 density with bounded Hessian is bounded (An integrable C² density with bounded Hessian is bounded).

[F4]

Iid random elements are mutually independent and have the same law (Identical distribution and IID families).

[F5]

Expectation is integration against the law, and integration against f dλd is integration of the product with f for nonnegative integrands (Change of variables for expectation, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).

[F6]

Under ACω, the C1 diffeomorphism u↦x−hu permits substitution for nonnegative integrands and for integrable signed integrands (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F7]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F8]

Dominated convergence applies to a pointwise convergent family with one integrable majorant (Dominated convergence).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7

By [F2], Zi:=K((x−Xi)/h) is a measurable real random variable. By [F3], f is bounded. Applying [F5] to ∣Zi∣, then [F6] to u↦x−hu, gives E∣Zi∣=∫∣K((x−t)/h)∣f(t)dt=hd∫∣K(u)∣f(x−hu)du≤hd∥f∥∞∥K∥1<∞. Thus every Zi is integrable. Put g(t)=K((x−t)/h) and g+=max⁡(g,0), g−=max⁡(−g,0). Both parts are nonnegative and their density integrals are finite, being bounded by the absolute integral just established. Apply [F5] separately to g+ and g−, then subtract their finite integrals using [F7]: EZi=∫g+f−∫g−f=∫gf. This derives the signed density identity without applying the nonnegative density theorem directly to g. Since the Xi have the same law, the Zi have the same expectation. Linearity [F7] and the signed substitution in [F6] therefore yield Ef^h(x)=1hdEZ1=∫RdK(u)f(x−hu)du.

1.2givenF9algebra

For fixed u, set q(t)=f(x−thu) on [0,1]. By [F9], q′(0)=−h∇f(x)⋅u and q′′(t)=h2uTD2f(x−thu)u. Integration by parts with 1−t and q′, then the second fundamental theorem, gives f(x−hu)=f(x)−h∇f(x)⋅u+h2∫01(1−t)uTD2f(x−thu)u dt. For u≠0, subtracting h22uTD2f(x)u defines a remainder h2∥u∥2ρ(h,u), where ρ(h,u)=∫01(1−t)uT(D2f(x−thu)−D2f(x))u∥u∥2dt. Continuity of the Hessian at x gives ρ(h,u)→0 for each fixed u; the global Hessian bound gives ∣ρ(h,u)∣≤H uniformly in h,u. Set ρ(h,0)=0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F8algebra∎

Substitute the expansion from step 1.2 into the convolution in step 1.1. The first moments are absolutely integrable because ∣uj∣≤1+∥u∥2 and K∈L1 with finite second absolute moment, so unit mass cancels f(x) and the zero first moments cancel the linear term. The remaining quadratic term is h22∑j,kμjk∂jkf(x). Moreover, ∣K(u)∣∥u∥2H is integrable and dominates the scaled remainder. Applying [F8] as h↓0 shows that the remainder divided by h2 tends to zero. The second moments μjk are absolutely finite by the same integrable moment condition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources