Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Density Estimation

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

For iid observations with a density on Rd, this page defines the pointwise density target and the kernel density estimator. It proves the second-order pointwise bias, pointwise variance and a global mean integrated squared error upper bound with explicit regularity, moment and bandwidth hypotheses. The global rate uses an L2 translation bound under W2,2(Rd); the pointwise variance regime includes both h→0 and nhd→∞. Point targets refer to a selected density version, and no minimax lower bound is claimed.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Density targets and the kernel density estimator

Definition

Fix an integer d≥1. A density version on Rd is a Borel function f:Rd→[0,∞) with ∫Rdf dλd=1. Write Pf=f dλd for its probability law (The measure with density f relative to μ). Let Θ be any set of such density versions. For sample size n≥1, the iid experiment has data space ((Rd)n,⨂i=1nB(Rd)) and sampling law Pf⊗n at parameter f∈Θ (Statistical experiments, Parametric statistical models, Identical distribution and IID families, Independent random elements, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates, For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique). The pointwise target at x∈Rd is the estimand ψx(f)=f(x):Θ→R (Estimands on a statistical model).

A normalized kernel is a Borel function K:Rd→R with K∈L1(λd) and ∫K dλd=1. It may be signed. For bandwidth h>0 and observations X1,…,Xn, the kernel density estimate is the indexed family f^h(x)=1nhd∑i=1nK ⁣(x−Xih),x∈Rd. For each fixed x, this is intended as a real-valued estimator of ψx; the next local lemma supplies its measurability (Statistics and estimators).

Assuming ACω, if K is pointwise nonnegative the estimate is a probability density for every sample, as proved in A nonnegative normalized kernel estimate integrates to one ↗. For a signed kernel the estimate need not be nonnegative. Point evaluation depends on the selected density version: this definition does not assert that f↦f(x) is identifiable from the law Pf.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Each fixed-point KDE evaluation is a statistic

Statement

Fix x∈Rd, h>0, n≥1, and a Borel normalized kernel K. The evaluation map Tx:(Rd)n→R,(z1,…,zn)↦1nhd∑i=1nK ⁣(x−zih) is measurable for the finite product Borel sigma-algebra. Hence it is a statistic on the iid density experiment.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Fixed x∈Rd, h>0, n≥1, and a Borel normalized kernel K.

[F1]

The sample space is the finite product Borel space and K is Borel (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

A statistic is a measurable map from the experiment's data space to its measurable target (Statistics and estimators, A measurable function between measurable spaces).

[F3]

Compositions of measurable maps are measurable (Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability).

[F4]

Finite sums and scalar multiples of real measurable functions are measurable (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined).

Proof

1.1givenF1F3

Each coordinate projection πi:(Rd)n→Rd is measurable by the definition of the finite product sigma-algebra. The map z↦(x−z)/h is continuous, hence Borel; composing it with πi and then with K gives a real measurable function on the sample space by [F1] and [F3].

2.1step 1.1F2F4∎

By [F4], the finite sum of these functions and its scalar multiple (nhd)−1 are measurable. This is exactly Tx, so [F2] makes it a statistic with target R. Since the estimand ψx also has target space R, Tx is an estimator of ψx.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The KDE is jointly measurable in sample and evaluation point

Statement

For a Borel normalized kernel K, h>0 and n≥1, the map Qh:(Rd)n×Rd→R,(z1,…,zn,x)↦1nhd∑i=1nK ⁣(x−zih) is Borel measurable for the finite product Borel sigma-algebra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Borel normalized kernel K, h>0, n≥1, and the finite product Borel data and evaluation spaces.

[F1]

The sample space carries the finite product Borel sigma-algebra, and K is Borel (Density targets and the kernel density estimator, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates).

[F2]

Composition of measurable maps is measurable (Composition with a Borel measurable outer map preserves measurability).

[F3]

Scalar multiples and finite sums of real measurable functions are measurable (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined).

[F4]

For positive integers a,b, B(Ra)⊗B(Rb)=B(Ra+b) under the coordinate identification (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4

Induct on the number of factors using the finite product recursion in [F1] and the two-factor equality [F4]. Starting with B(Rd), this identifies the specified (n+1)-factor sigma-algebra with B(R(n+1)d). For each i, the affine map (z1,…,zn,x)↦(x−zi)/h is continuous on this Euclidean space: inverse images of open sets are open, hence inverse images of Borel sets are Borel by closure under complements and countable unions. It is therefore measurable for the specified product sigma-algebra. Composing with the Borel map K gives a measurable real function by [F2].

2.1step 1.1F3∎

Applying [F3] to the finite sum of these functions and multiplying by the constant (nhd)−1 proves that Qh is Borel measurable.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A nonnegative normalized kernel estimate integrates to one

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. If K≥0 pointwise and ∫K dλd=1, then for every sample z1,…,zn∈Rd and bandwidth h>0, the function x↦1nhd∑i=1nK ⁣(x−zih) is nonnegative and has Lebesgue integral one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; a pointwise nonnegative Borel kernel K of integral one; n≥1; h>0; and a sample z1,…,zn.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The estimate is the finite sum (nhd)−1∑iK((x−zi)/h) and ∫K=1 (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

Under ACω, a C1 diffeomorphism obeys the change-of-variables formula for every nonnegative measurable integrand (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F3]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2

Every summand is nonnegative because K≥0. For fixed zi, the map Ti(u)=zi+hu is a C1 diffeomorphism of Rd with ∣det⁡DTi∣=hd. Applying [F2] to K gives ∫Rdh−dK ⁣(x−zih)dx=∫Rdh−dK(u)hddu=1.

2.1step 1.1F3algebra∎

Each scaled translate is in L1 by step 1.1. Linearity [F3] therefore gives ∫Rd1nhd∑i=1nK ⁣(x−zih)dx=1n∑i=1n1=1. This proves the claim.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

An integrable C² density with bounded Hessian is bounded

Statement

Let f:Rd→[0,∞) be a density version with all partial derivatives through order two existing and continuous, so ∫f dλd=1. If its Hessian satisfies H:=sup⁡x∥D2f(x)∥op<∞, then f is bounded.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: d≥1, a pointwise nonnegative C2 density version f on Rd, and a finite global Hessian bound H.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

A density version is Borel, nonnegative and has integral one (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

Assuming ACω, every box with side lengths ℓ1,…,ℓd has Lebesgue measure ∏jℓj (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included).

[F4]

The total-derivative chain rule differentiates a smooth function along an affine line (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

Proof

1.1givenF1F4F5choosealgebra

Set C=max⁡(1,H). For x∈Rd, write M=f(x) and g=∇f(x). For q(t)=f(x+ty), the chain rule [F4] gives q′(0)=g⋅y and q′′(t)=yTD2f(x+ty)y. Integration by parts and the second fundamental theorem [F5] give q(1)−q(0)−q′(0)=∫01(1−t)q′′(t)dt. Since ∣q′′(t)∣≤C∥y∥2 and ∫01(1−t)dt=1/2, this yields ∣f(x+y)−M−g⋅y∣≤C2∥y∥2, so both the upper and lower Taylor bounds with this remainder hold. Taking y=−g/C and using f≥0 yields 0≤f(x−g/C)≤M−∥g∥2/(2C); hence ∥g∥≤2CM.

2.1step 1.1A1F2algebra

If M>0, put r=18M/C. For every y with ∥y∥≤r, the corresponding lower Taylor bound and step 1.1 give f(x+y)≥M−∥g∥r−C2r2≥M(1−28−1128)≥12M. The cube Q=x+[−r/d,r/d]d lies in that ball and has measure λd(Q)=(2r/d)d=(M/(16Cd))d/2 by [A1] and [F2].

3.1step 2.1F1F3algebra∎

Monotonicity [F3] and ∫f=1 now imply 1≥∫Qf dλd≥12M(M16Cd)d/2. Thus M1+d/2≤2(16Cd)d/2 for every x with f(x)>0; points where f(x)=0 satisfy the same resulting finite bound. Therefore f is bounded.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Second-order kernel convolution has an L² bias bound

Statement

Assume ACω. Let f be a density version in W2,2(Rd), and let K be a normalized Borel kernel with K∈L1, ∫ujK(u) du=0 for every j, and M2(K):=∫Rd∣K(u)∣ ∥u∥2du<∞. Define the convolution Shf=∫K(u)f(⋅−hu)du as an L2 equivalence class. With ∥D2f∥2,F2:=∑j,k=1d∥∂jkf∥L22, one has, for every h>0, ∥Shf−f∥L2≤h22M2(K) ∥D2f∥2,F.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, d≥1, a density version f∈W2,2(Rd), and a normalized Borel kernel K with the displayed moment conditions.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Under ACω, W2,2 consists of L2 classes whose weak partial derivatives through order two are in L2 (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F2]

Under ACω, Cc∞(Rd) is dense in W2,2(Rd): for every ϵ>0 there is a smooth compactly supported g with ∥g−f∥W2,2<ϵ (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).

[F4]

Under ACω, a C1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for integrable functions; translations therefore preserve L2 norms (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F5]

Holder's inequality with exponents 2,2 gives ∣∫ab∣2≤(∫∣a∣2)(∫∣b∣2) when the square integrals are finite (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F6]

The total-derivative chain rule differentiates a smooth function along an affine line (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

Proof

1.1givenA1F3F4F5F6F7algebra

First take g∈Cc∞(Rd). For each x,u, set q(t)=g(x−thu). The chain rule [F6] gives q′(0)=−h∇g(x)⋅u and q′′(t)=h2uTD2g(x−thu)u. Integration by parts and the second fundamental theorem [F7] give g(x−hu)=g(x)−h∇g(x)⋅u+h2∫01(1−t) uTD2g(x−thu)u dt. The first moments are absolutely integrable since ∣uj∣≤1+∥u∥2 and K∈L1 with M2(K)<∞. Integrating against K(u) therefore cancels the constant and linear terms by ∫K=1 and ∫ujK(u)du=0. Euclidean Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∣uTD2g(y)u∣≤∥u∥ ∥D2g(y)u∥≤∥u∥2∥D2g(y)∥F. Apply Holder [F5] with the finite measure ∣K(u)∣(1−t)∥u∥2du dt, whose total mass is M2(K)/2, to obtain ∣Shg(x)−g(x)∣2≤h4(M2(K)2)∫Rd ⁣∫01∣K(u)∣(1−t)∥u∥2∥D2g(x−thu)∥F2dt du. Tonelli [F3] and translation invariance from [F4] then give ∥Shg−g∥22≤h4(M2(K)2)2∥D2g∥2,F2.

2.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1algebra∎

For every Borel representative q∈L2, the integrand (x,u)↦K(u)q(x−hu) is product-measurable. Holder [F5] and Tonelli [F3] show its defining integral exists absolutely for almost every x and ∥Shq∥22≤∥K∥1∫Rd∣K(u)∣∫Rd∣q(x−hu)∣2dx du=∥K∥12∥q∥22, by Holder [F5], Tonelli [F3], and translation invariance [F4]. If two Borel representatives agree almost everywhere, translation invariance makes their translates agree almost everywhere for each u; Tonelli [F3] then makes their convolution integrals agree for almost every x. Thus Sh is well-defined as an L2 equivalence class on the classes used here. Given ϵ>0, choose g∈Cc∞ as in [F2]. The finite sum defining ∥D2(g−f)∥2,F is at most d∥g−f∥W2,2, so step 1.1 and the operator bound just proved imply ∥Shf−f∥2≤(∥K∥1+1)ϵ+h22M2(K)(∥D2f∥2,F+dϵ). Letting ϵ↓0 proves the asserted bound.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Pointwise second-order bias of the KDE

Statement

Assume ACω. Let X1,…,Xn be iid with a Borel probability density version f on Rd. Let K:Rd→R be Borel with K∈L1∩L2, ∫K(u)du=1, ∫ujK(u)du=0 for each j, and ∫∣K(u)∣∥u∥2du<∞. Suppose f has continuous second partial derivatives and a globally bounded continuous Hessian. At each fixed x∈Rd, as h↓0, Ef^h(x)−f(x)=h22∑j,k=1dμjk ∂jkf(x)+o(h2),μjk:=∫RdujukK(u)du. Here r(h)=o(h2) means r(h)/h2→0 as h↓0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, d,n≥1, iid Xi with density version f, a normalized kernel K with the stated integrability and moment conditions, fixed x, and h>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The kernel estimate is (nhd)−1∑iK((x−Xi)/h); the density version is nonnegative, Borel and integrates to one (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

Each fixed-x evaluation is a measurable real statistic (Each fixed-point KDE evaluation is a statistic).

[F3]

A nonnegative C2 density with bounded Hessian is bounded (An integrable C² density with bounded Hessian is bounded).

[F4]

Iid random elements are mutually independent and have the same law (Identical distribution and IID families).

[F5]

Expectation is integration against the law, and integration against f dλd is integration of the product with f for nonnegative integrands (Change of variables for expectation, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).

[F6]

Under ACω, the C1 diffeomorphism u↦x−hu permits substitution for nonnegative integrands and for integrable signed integrands (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F7]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1 (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F8]

Dominated convergence applies to a pointwise convergent family with one integrable majorant (Dominated convergence).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7

By [F2], Zi:=K((x−Xi)/h) is a measurable real random variable. By [F3], f is bounded. Applying [F5] to ∣Zi∣, then [F6] to u↦x−hu, gives E∣Zi∣=∫∣K((x−t)/h)∣f(t)dt=hd∫∣K(u)∣f(x−hu)du≤hd∥f∥∞∥K∥1<∞. Thus every Zi is integrable. Put g(t)=K((x−t)/h) and g+=max⁡(g,0), g−=max⁡(−g,0). Both parts are nonnegative and their density integrals are finite, being bounded by the absolute integral just established. Apply [F5] separately to g+ and g−, then subtract their finite integrals using [F7]: EZi=∫g+f−∫g−f=∫gf. This derives the signed density identity without applying the nonnegative density theorem directly to g. Since the Xi have the same law, the Zi have the same expectation. Linearity [F7] and the signed substitution in [F6] therefore yield Ef^h(x)=1hdEZ1=∫RdK(u)f(x−hu)du.

1.2givenF9algebra

For fixed u, set q(t)=f(x−thu) on [0,1]. By [F9], q′(0)=−h∇f(x)⋅u and q′′(t)=h2uTD2f(x−thu)u. Integration by parts with 1−t and q′, then the second fundamental theorem, gives f(x−hu)=f(x)−h∇f(x)⋅u+h2∫01(1−t)uTD2f(x−thu)u dt. For u≠0, subtracting h22uTD2f(x)u defines a remainder h2∥u∥2ρ(h,u), where ρ(h,u)=∫01(1−t)uT(D2f(x−thu)−D2f(x))u∥u∥2dt. Continuity of the Hessian at x gives ρ(h,u)→0 for each fixed u; the global Hessian bound gives ∣ρ(h,u)∣≤H uniformly in h,u. Set ρ(h,0)=0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F8algebra∎

Substitute the expansion from step 1.2 into the convolution in step 1.1. The first moments are absolutely integrable because ∣uj∣≤1+∥u∥2 and K∈L1 with finite second absolute moment, so unit mass cancels f(x) and the zero first moments cancel the linear term. The remaining quadratic term is h22∑j,kμjk∂jkf(x). Moreover, ∣K(u)∣∥u∥2H is integrable and dominates the scaled remainder. Applying [F8] as h↓0 shows that the remainder divided by h2 tends to zero. The second moments μjk are absolutely finite by the same integrable moment condition.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Pointwise variance of the KDE

Statement

Assume ACω. Let X1,…,Xn be iid with bounded continuous Borel density version f on Rd. Let K:Rd→R be Borel, K∈L1∩L2, and ∫K(u)du=1. For fixed x∈Rd, along bandwidths h=hn>0 with hn→0 and nhnd→∞, Var⁡(f^hn(x))=f(x)∥K∥22nhnd+o((nhnd)−1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, iid X1,…,Xn with bounded continuous density version f, a Borel kernel K∈L1∩L2 with unit integral, a fixed x, and hn→0, nhnd→∞.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The fixed-point estimate is f^h(x)=(nhd)−1∑iK((x−Xi)/h) (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

Its fixed-point evaluations are measurable (Each fixed-point KDE evaluation is a statistic).

[F3]

The Xi are independent and identically distributed random elements (Identical distribution and IID families).

[F4]

Measurable functions of independent random elements remain independent (Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence).

[F5]

Expectations of integrable products of independent real random variables factor (Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables).

[F6]

For a square-integrable real random variable, Var⁡(Z)=E[(Z−EZ)2] (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space).

[F7]

Expectation is integration against the law, and a density law satisfies ∫g d(fλd)=∫gf dλd for nonnegative measurable g (Change of variables for expectation, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).

[F8]

Under ACω, nonnegative C1 substitutions obey the Lebesgue change-of-variables formula (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

[F9]

Under ACω, a C1 diffeomorphism obeys the change-of-variables formula for integrable functions (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F10]

Dominated convergence applies under the integrable majorant ∥f∥∞K2 (Dominated convergence).

[F11]

Expectation is linear for finite sums of integrable variables (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F4F7F8

Put Zi=K((x−Xi)/h). By [F2] and [F7], and using the nonnegative substitution u↦x−hu from [F8], E[Zi2]=hd∫K(u)2f(x−hu)du≤hd∥f∥∞∥K∥22<∞. Likewise E∣Zi∣≤hd∥f∥∞∥K∥1<∞, so each Zi is integrable and square-integrable. The maps z↦K((x−z)/h) preserve independence by [F4]; identical laws of Xi give identical laws of Zi.

2.1step 1.1F3F5F6F11algebra

Let Wi=Zi−EZi. For i≠j, [F5] applied to the independent integrable variables Wi,Wj gives E[WiWj]=E[Wi]E[Wj]=0. Expanding the finite square and using expectation linearity [F11] therefore gives Var⁡(f^h(x))=1nh2d(E[Z12]−(EZ1)2).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F7F9F10F11algebra∎

Step 1.1 shows that t↦K((x−t)/h)f(t) is integrable. Put g(t)=K((x−t)/h) and decompose g=g+−g− into its nonnegative parts. The density integrals of both parts are finite because ∫∣g∣f<∞ by step 1.1. Apply the nonnegative density identity [F7] to each part and subtract using [F11], obtaining EZ1=∫gf. Applying the signed substitution [F9] to this integrable product gives EZ1=hd∫K(u)f(x−hu)du, so ∣EZ1∣≤hd∥f∥∞∥K∥1. Along any sequence hn→0, [F10] gives ∫K(u)2f(x−hnu)du⟶f(x)∥K∥22. Thus the first term in step 2.1 is f(x)∥K∥22/(nhnd)+o((nhnd)−1). The subtracted mean-square term is O(n−1)=o((nhnd)−1) because hnd→0. The additional nhnd→∞ condition places the expansion in the vanishing-variance regime. This proves the formula.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Global MISE upper bound for the KDE

Statement

Assume ACω. Let X1,…,Xn be iid with a Borel density version f∈W2,2(Rd). Let K:Rd→R be Borel, K∈L1∩L2, ∫K(u)du=1, ∫ujK(u)du=0 for every j, and M2(K):=∫∣K(u)∣∥u∥2du<∞. For every h>0 define MISE⁡(f^h):=E∫Rd(f^h(x)−f(x))2dx. Then MISE⁡(f^h)≤h44M2(K)2∥D2f∥2,F2+∥K∥22nhd. In particular, hn=n−1/(d+4) gives MISE⁡(f^hn)=O(n−4/(d+4)), where O(n−4/(d+4)) means bounded by a finite constant times n−4/(d+4) for all sufficiently large n. This is an upper rate under the displayed hypotheses; it is not a minimax lower bound.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, n,d≥1, iid observations with density version f∈W2,2(Rd), a Borel kernel with the displayed integrability and moment conditions, and h>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice, written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The estimate is the finite sum (nhd)−1∑iK((x−Xi)/h), and f is a selected Borel density version (Density targets and the kernel density estimator).

[F2]

The estimator is jointly Borel in the sample and evaluation point (The KDE is jointly measurable in sample and evaluation point); arithmetic operations preserve measurability (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined).

[F3]

The convolution bias satisfies ∥Shf−f∥2≤h2M2(K)∥D2f∥2,F/2 (Second-order kernel convolution has an L² bias bound).

[F4]

Iid random elements are independent and identically distributed (Identical distribution and IID families).

[F5]

Measurable functions preserve independence, and expectations of integrable products of independent real random variables factor (Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence, Expectations factor over finite products of independent random variables).

[F7]

For nonnegative measurable integrands, expectation under Pf=f dλd is integration against f (Change of variables for expectation, Integrating against a density agrees with integrating the product).

[F8]

Under ACω, the C1 affine substitutions used below satisfy the nonnegative and L1 change-of-variables formulas (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F9]

A nonnegative measurable function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere (A nonnegative measurable function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere).

[F10]

For a square-integrable variable Z, Var⁡(Z)=E[(Z−EZ)2] (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space).

[F11]

Expectation is linear on integrable variables (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F6

For fixed h, [F2] makes (z,x)↦f^h(x) Borel, and [F1] makes f(x) Borel as a function of (z,x). Arithmetic measurability in [F2] therefore makes the squared error product-measurable and nonnegative. Tonelli [F6] identifies MISE with the integral over x of its expected pointwise squared error, even before finiteness has been established.

2.1givenA1F4F6F7F8F9F11step 1.1

Write qh(x,z)=h−dK((x−z)/h). By Tonelli and the substitution z+hu in [F8], ∫RdE∣qh(x,X1)∣dx=∥K∥1,∫RdE[qh(x,X1)2]dx=h−d∥K∥22. Consequently, [F9] makes the summands integrable and square-integrable for almost every x. For such x, put g(z)=qh(x,z) and g+=max⁡(g,0), g−=max⁡(−g,0). The nonnegative density formula [F7] applied to ∣g∣ shows ∫∣g∣f<∞. Thus both parts have finite density integrals, and [F7] applied separately to them, followed by subtraction using [F11], gives Eqh(x,X1)=∫g(z)f(z)dz. Signed substitution [F8] then identifies this integral with Shf(x), and identical laws plus finite-sum linearity [F11] give Ef^h(x)=Shf(x).

3.1step 2.1F4F5F10F11algebra

At almost every x from step 2.1, the variables qh(x,Xi) are iid and square-integrable. Set Wi=qh(x,Xi)−Eqh(x,Xi). These are independent, integrable and square-integrable by [F5] and step 2.1; for i≠j, [F5] makes WiWj integrable and gives E[WiWj]=EWi EWj=0. Expanding the finite square in the variance definition [F10] and applying [F11] gives Var⁡(f^h(x))=n−2∑iEWi2=Var⁡(qh(x,X1))/n. Expanding one centered square using [F10]–[F11] gives Var⁡(qh(x,X1))=E[qh(x,X1)2]−(Eqh(x,X1))2≤E[qh(x,X1)2]. Integrating and using step 2.1 bounds the integrated variance by ∥K∥22/(nhd).

3.2step 2.1F3

For almost every x, step 2.1 identifies the bias with Shf(x)−f(x). The L2 bound [F3] therefore gives ∫Rd(Ef^h(x)−f(x))2dx≤h44M2(K)2∥D2f∥2,F2.

4.1F10F11step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2algebra∎

At almost every x, expand f^h(x)−f(x)=(f^h(x)−Ef^h(x))+(Ef^h(x)−f(x)). The centered term has expectation zero, so [F10]–[F11] give E[(f^h(x)−f(x))2]=Var⁡(f^h(x))+(Ef^h(x)−f(x))2. Integrate this nonnegative identity using step 1.1, then apply steps 3.1 and 3.2 to obtain the displayed MISE bound. For hn=n−1/(d+4), both hn4 and (nhnd)−1 equal n−4/(d+4), which proves the stated upper rate.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources